I'll look into it. I've been using Expresso to develop the regex - that is
pretty handy too. (http://www.ultrapico.com/Expresso.htm)
On 3/28/07, Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey.
Check out regex coach. It's a debugging tool that let's you run your
What Klaus said ;)
http://www.malsup.com/jquery/taconite/#debugging
On 3/28/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah ha! We'll see if that works... I'm by no means an XML guru... thanks
for the tip. I'll let you know if it works.
Chris
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Christopher Jordan
The one gotcha I've run into is with the disabled attribute - setting
disabled=false doesn't do anything. You have to remove the attribute
entirely using (wait for it...) removeAttr() to re-enable a disabled form
field.
On 3/26/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick,
Anything you can
attr select=#HiddenStatusFieldID name=value value=true)
On 3/26/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
I'm working on this problem with Rick, and I've never used taconite
before.
The idea is that we've got three hidden form fields on the calling page
which are associated with
Thanks much.
On 3/26/07, Jake McGraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To quote Mastering Regular Expressions 3rd Ed. by J. Friedl:
The real problem is that on the majority of systems, you simply can't
match arbitrarily nested constructs with regular expressions.
He goes on to give the syntax for
bleh - cfelseif not /cfelseif
On 3/25/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One way around this is by sending a separate form field that you can use
to trigger a cfswitch or cfif block that processes the fields differently.
In other words, if you added a field called Action, on your
PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Daemach
*Sent:* Sunday, March 25, 2007 3:28 PM
*To:* jQuery Discussion
*Subject:* Re: [jQuery] Taconite Plug-in Question...
bleh - cfelseif not /cfelseif
On 3/25/07, *Daemach* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One way around this is by sending a separate form field that you
Not just Rey's ;)
On 3/25/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. I work mostly in Java (JSP) and PHP. And didn't I hear that CF
was being discontinued? Ha, just kidding - just trying to get Rey's
blood pressure up. :-)
Hey, Mike...
Do you use CF?
Rick
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things that
could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm struggling with in particular
now is the benefits of creating object prototypes over just storing data in
a global tree. A few people on this list have taken a shot at explaining
.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:
||:.
Nathan Young
Cisco.com-Interface Development
A: ncy1717
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daemach
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:16 AM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery
I just ordered it myself along with Flanagan's book.
On 3/23/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daemach schrieb:
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things
that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm struggling with in
particular now is the benefits
I had some thoughts along this line too. I got hung up on
dependencies. If there was a central plugin library and a
standardized method for setting version numbers and such, an auto-
updating mechanism would be really handy. I was thinking more along
the lines of an apollo or win32 front-end
?
On 3/23/07, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daemach schrieb:
I have no formal programming training, so I often brute-force things
that could be a lot more elegant. One thing I'm struggling with in
particular now is the benefits of creating object prototypes over just
storing data
I wrote the jquery plugin and fixed a few bugs but credit for the
original dump() goes to Shawn at Netgrow.
On Mar 22, 10:50 am, Michael E. Carluen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To whoever is responsible for it, if you're on the list, please claim your
kudos for a job well done. Thanks!!.. its
Yeah, I gave up on dealing with stylesheets at all and added a method to
pass a CSS string to override such as: {color:ff,etc}
On 3/19/07, Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
if (ElementInQuestion.style.fontSize == 13px){whatever}
That will
I think John is brilliant - a bona fide genius. In fact, he's me! In
another forum I participate in there are 2 other John Wilsons, so I started
using Daemach instead. Now it's habit.
I do think taconite is a great bridge for beginning coders - it has all the
power of jQuery because it's
Great work Chris -
For those of you who aren't familiar with the CF functions, they are very
helpful real-world functions. A fantastic reference site for many different
code APIs can be found here: http://gotapi.com/ For Cold Fusion, look
under Macromedia. Try looking under functions for
Why can't you $.post(myurl.cfm,data,function(response){ eval(response)})?
If you're certain the response is a valid json string, eval turns it back
into a javascript object/array/whatever.
On 3/16/07, Bojan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am trying to figure out how to deserialize
Looks like it works - is it making more sense now?
On 3/16/07, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and I meant to give you the online demo…
http://bodaford.whitestonemedia.com/html/calctest.cfm
Rick
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *John
I'm working on something that I want a user to be able to override by
including a specific class somewhere in the CSS definitions. If that class
doesn't exist I want to add a default style. This seems like something that
should have come up before but search isn't coming up with anything. Can
Try this:
cfoutput query=myQuery
a class=tooltip id=aid_#myQuery.id# href=somepage.cfm
?to=#myquery.id##myQuery.text#/a
img id=imgid_#myQuery.id# src=/thumbnails/#myQuery.image# /
/cfloop
script type=text/javascript
$(document).ready(function(){
$(img.tooltip).hide();
Yes that makes sense, and it's why I need to find out if a class exists in
the stylesheet before I apply the style.
On 3/16/07, Nathan Young -X (natyoung - Artizen at Cisco)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
IOW given the following:
style
#myDiv {background: blue;}
/style
div id=myDiv
figure this out.
$('div
id=ajaxCFCLoadingIndicator/div').css(css).appendTo(ind[2]).hide();
On 3/16/07, rolfsf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if it's a class you're looking for, I think you can use something like
if( $('#myDiv').is('.className')) {...}
Daemach wrote:
I'm working on something
you can use something like
if( $('#myDiv').is('.className')) {...}
Daemach wrote:
I'm working on something that I want a user to be able to override by
including a specific class somewhere in the CSS definitions. If that
class
doesn't exist I want to add a default style. This seems like
div id=myDiv/div will have background-color: white;
div id=myDiv class=myClass/div will have background-color: red;
div id=myDiv class=myClass style=background-color: blue;/div
will
have a class=myClass, but background-color: blue;
Daemach wrote:
I just tested this. When defining a style
Yes, sorry - I was on the phone when I wrote that ;) The class is just a
fast way to select a bunch of elements that you want to apply common
behavior to. You can call it anything you want.
On 3/16/07, Michael E. Carluen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Daemach. Looking at the scripts, I'm
.
Daemach wrote:
Hmm - in theory this could work if the style was applied immediately. I
guess the question is, if I'm creating this element dynamically when
does
the css style get applied so I can check it? I'm doing the following at
the
moment, but I plan on moving the .css definition
().append(data);
}
In general you should avoid creating outside functions inside the
document.ready function for cleanliness if nothing else.
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, Daemach...
I've been working with the various suggestions I've gotten and
have made some progress. I had to spend most
I just did Sam, thank you.
Sam Collett wrote:
On 15/03/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To try and master jQuery I've been playing with a few ideas. I decided
to
flesh this one out for use on one of my sites and in hopes it can benefit
someone else as well I'm making it available
It's possible - I need to give it some thought. For the moment, though, you
can select all inputs inside a given form like this:
$(:input,#yourformid).autoSave(function);
Jake McGraw wrote:
Any way we could get this attached to whole form elements? Something like:
$(form).autoSave()?
You can look here for a live demo until I can get something better on my
blog:
http://beta.missionincrease.org/jQuery/autosave_example.cfm
matt2012 wrote:
this looks great a few working examples would really be appreciated
Matt.
--
View this message in context:
Thanks - that makes sense.
I was viewing it in firebug. It actually did say just undefined until I
clicked on the value and it opened to an editable string that said
undefinedundefined. Might be a firebug...bug.
Michael Geary wrote:
I was poking around the DOM looking for incorrectly
Do you have access to ColdFusion as a backend? If so, there is already a
jquery/javascript framework called ajaxCFC that handles the heavy lifting
for you. You can pass data and complex objects back and forth with ease.
You also mentioned a separate web app - keep in mind that you can only
This would be easier to install if there was a direct link to the script
somewhere :)
Even better if Greasemonkey could check the clipboard...
Rey Bango-2 wrote:
Hi all,
I've added www.sheriff.org, marmot.com http://www.novita.org.au to the
list.
Keep the sites coming. Also, if
to jump though hoops :)
Rey Bango-2 wrote:
Quit being a lazy bone and cut paste!!! ;o)
Rey...
Daemach wrote:
This would be easier to install if there was a direct link to the script
somewhere :)
Even better if Greasemonkey could check the clipboard...
Rey Bango-2 wrote:
Hi all
. I
tried opening the file as you said but that only gave me the option of
saving it.
What am I doing wrong?
Gerry
- Original Message -
From: Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discuss@jquery.com
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jQuery] jQuery Powered Sites
Do you by any chance have elements with the sameID? If you are using
firebug, try going to the console and pasting in that selector -
$('div#mypage') - if it returns an array with more than 1 element, there's
your problem. You can mouse over the array elements and firebug will
highlight the
I'm working with the fade and slide animations now, and while testing I've
hit a couple of points where an element tried to slideIn when it was already
... in, and fadeOut when it was already...out. In both cases the animation
starts from the beginning, fully hiding the element and sliding it in
instance found. Thanks for the suggestion.
Daemach wrote:
Do you by any chance have elements with the sameID? If you are using
firebug, try going to the console and pasting in that selector -
$('div#mypage') - if it returns an array with more than 1 element,
there's your problem. You can
and a create
date over x days ago.
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Very clever, Daemach!
Now, besides saving info on the fly,
and preserving info from a session,
what other practical benefits do you see for this?
And what if a session were abandoned? What happens with
the data? Does it remain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you create a ticket for this? Otherwise it's just going to get
lost.
http://dev.jquery.com/
--John
On 3/15/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working with the fade and slide animations now, and while testing
I've
hit a couple of points where
Perfect - if you could just add the same fitering to slideIn, slideOut,
fadeIn and fadeOut we're there. I'm glad there is a precedent.
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Daemach schrieb:
Hmm - I'm not sure how or why someone would rely on a hidden element
appearing instantaneously and then animating
What a simple and elegant solution ;) I do hope this will be addressed still
to make the library work more intuitively but this saves me from doing an if
statement.
I love this list...
David-310 wrote:
Hi Daemach,
I came across the same problem and agree that it is counter-intuitive
There's no reason you can't include some prototype extensions where you need
them - not the library, just discrete functions. Put this in a script file:
//returns -1 if not found
if (!Array.prototype.indexOf) {
Array.prototype.indexOf = function(val, fromIndex) {
if
Disregard this, please.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
){
$(#Result).empty().append(data); })
}
Since, in this example, you don't have 2 post functions trying to call the
same result, it is ok to encapsulate everything in one line.
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Thanks for the advice on Firebug and the debug code, Daemach.
I've been using it for a few
You might find some clues here - this is taken from Mike Alsup's most
excellent taconite plugin (http://www.malsup.com/jquery/taconite/):
if (typeof xml == 'string')
xml = $.taconite.convert(xml);
// convert string to xml document
$.taconite.convert = function(s) {
var doc;
I wrote an autosave plugin a while back that automates autosaving fields. It
doesn't submit the form at one time - instead it updates each field
immediately if they are changed. I can find somewhere to post it if you
want to play with it.
It gets called like the snippet below - I use ajaxCFC
Hmm - that does bring up a point tho... aren't ID's supposed to be unique
even in checkboxes? May need to use the name attribute instead...
Daemach wrote:
I usually use filter with a selector, but a function should work. Can you
not do the following instead tho?
$(radio:[EMAIL
I usually use filter with a selector, but a function should work. Can you
not do the following instead tho?
$(radio:[EMAIL PROTECTED] + id + ])
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Hi folks,
I've tried to use the filter function in the past, but have never been
successful. Usually, I just
with an _1 belong to select_1. See?
Chris
ps. still haven't tried your suggestion. Just saw this post and thought
I'd respond real quick. :o)
Daemach wrote:
Hmm - that does bring up a point tho... aren't ID's supposed to be
unique
even in checkboxes? May need to use the name attribute
between these elements. I'm pretty sure
there isn't a parent child relationship between them. :o(
Chris
Daemach wrote:
I understand, but in your radio selector you're using [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which
means
begins with an underscore In this case I think you want [EMAIL PROTECTED
. Oh well. Thanks for tryin' to help me there
Daemach. :o)
Cheers,
Chris
Daemach wrote:
I understand, but in your radio selector you're using [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which
means
begins with an underscore In this case I think you want [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which
means contains an underscore
I was poking around the DOM looking for incorrectly scoped variables and I
found the following node:
window.undefined = undefinedundefined
What is this for?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/window.undefined-%3D-%22undefinedundefined%22--tf3405952.html#a9487226
Sent from
Did you get this working Rick?
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Thanks for the advice on Firebug and the debug code, Daemach.
I've been using it for a few days, but haven't learned it well.
It has been good about notifying me of syntax errors, however!
Rick
-Original Message-
From
It looks great - the only thing I would add is that the plugin roll up the
menu when you mouse over a menu item that doesn't have a dropdown attached.
On your site for example moving from consumer info to glasshouse works
smoothly, but the menu doesn't disappear for a few seconds if you move
seconds if you move
from
glasshouse to city of gurya (in ff2)
Daemach, I think Joel did that on purpose, to allow for mousing errors.
There is a 400 ms onmouseout delay (adjustable) whether mousing onto
another
menu item, or just anywhere out of the dropdown.
-- Josh
- Original
What does the !! do?
Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
Please add:
StructKeyExists: function(s,k){
for(var n in s){
if (n == k) return true;
}
return false;
},
Shall we post additions and updates here?
This would be
On 3/14/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the !! do?
Dan G. Switzer, II wrote:
Please add:
StructKeyExists: function(s,k){
for(var n in s){
if (n == k) return true;
}
return false
I'm not having any luck with the following 2 commands - is this a bug or
something I'm missing? I've tried with colgroup / as well.
$(#myTable).append(colgroup/colgroup);
$(colgroup/colgroup).appendTo(#myTable);
--
View this message in context:
);
}
/script
Hope this helps...
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Thanks for the advice on Firebug and the debug code, Daemach.
I've been using it for a few days, but haven't learned it well.
It has been good about notifying me of syntax errors, however!
Rick
-Original Message
= colgroup/colgroup + t.innerHTML;
Hmmm not sure this will work in IE.
Karl Rudd
On 3/14/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not having any luck with the following 2 commands - is this a bug or
something I'm missing? I've tried with colgroup / as well.
$(#myTable).append(colgroup
So on the selector question, is there any jQuery selector that would enable
me to limit the search to a single table column?
Daemach wrote:
In my ongoing quest to master jQuery I had an itch to write a table
filtering mechanism. I'm going for speed and elegance here so I want this
to work
I would like to be able to dump the contents of the current selector to the
console using $#myselector).debug() without loading a plugin. Something
as simple as the following would work, though if you devs have some ideas on
how to make it more useful I'm sure it would be welcomed, especially by
I'm relatively new as well but I might be able to shed some light.
This is one generic method:
$([EMAIL PROTECTED] a.open).each(function() {
$(this).click(function(){
Sure you can. You can use ajax for anything you want.
On the currency validation why can't you replace anything that is not a
number or a decimal with ? That should give you a valid number to
validate.
validate ele.value.replace(/[^0-9\.]/g,)
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, guys...
I
*sigh*
Fine. I'll just add the function to my local jquery.js It's a pain in the
neck to have to add and remove the plugin code for a 30 second test.
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Erik Beeson schrieb:
Given that you don't need (or want) debug functionality in a
production environment, I would
or opera (not bloody likely) I'll add a
function that tests for the availability of a console. Until then this
works for me.
Christopher Jordan wrote:
Daemach,
Why don't you just make a nice debug plug-in, that you can include at
the top of your code to give you the functions you need
I'm not sure what an ant build is, but adding this to the bottom of jquery.js
on my dev box works.
jQuery.fn.debug = function() {console.log(this); return this;}
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Daemach schrieb:
I already have a plugin - it contains the code I put in my first email.
I
just don't
]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daemach
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 3:41 PM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Please add a basic debug function to
the jQuery core...
I already have a plugin - it contains the code I put in my
wrote:
Daemach wrote:
I would like to be able to dump the contents of the current selector to
the
console using $#myselector).debug() without loading a plugin.
Something
as simple as the following would work, though if you devs have some ideas
on
how to make it more useful I'm sure it would
not hit the same walls I did when I was getting started.
Karl Rudd wrote:
Daemach I think you may have read a little too much harshness into
Brice's reply. Brice may have needed to use a little clearer, not so
open to being interperated as harsh.
Brice is quite helpful usually so it would
.
Brice Burgess wrote:
Daemach wrote:
I would like to be able to dump the contents of the current selector to
the
console using $#myselector).debug() without loading a plugin.
Something
as simple as the following would work, though if you devs have some ideas
on
how to make it more useful I'm
of the cool ones on here and I think he's
just voicing his opinion in general. I didn't read it as anything
personal against ya. :o)
Could everybody please just take a deep breath and re-read anything
they're about to post? Lets stay cool with each other. :o)
Rey
Daemach wrote:
Thanks
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
www.learningjquery.com
On Mar 12, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Daemach wrote:
So on the selector question, is there any jQuery selector that
would enable
me to limit the search to a single table column?
Daemach wrote:
In my ongoing quest to master
may want to do something similar.
Matt Kruse
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Daemach
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 5:19 PM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Fastest selector for searching a single table
column?
OK
In my ongoing quest to master jQuery I had an itch to write a table filtering
mechanism. I'm going for speed and elegance here so I want this to work
fast enough to bind to a keyup event without bogging down even on long
tables. Using DOM coding if I wanted to search the 3rd column only I would
OK the cellindex property of the td inside which the text field resided would
get me the current column, at least in firefox...
Daemach wrote:
In my ongoing quest to master jQuery I had an itch to write a table
filtering mechanism. I'm going for speed and elegance here so I want
/cfide/scripts/cfforms.js might give you some ideas. Specifically function
_CF_checknumber(object_value, required).
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, all.
I was wondering if anyone knew how to add
a currency validation function (US Dollars) to Jorn's Validation plug-in
at www.bassistance.de?
Good read. A bit further down in the blog he mentioned a push to add
browser-level JSON parsing for speed and security. If you are going to
Max2007 or cf.objective() perhaps you and Rob could bend Adobe's ear to
implement a cfjson tag that emulates cfwddx, including cf2js where it would
dump a
Matt, are you reading this list? I am anxiously awaiting the jQuery port of
your table filtering/sorting functionality. Is this coming soon? The demos
on your site are very very fast and would fit perfectly into a project I'm
about to start.
--
View this message in context:
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Matt-Krause-tf3373126.html#a9386627
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Disregard this please - time to get a new keyboard ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Matt-Krause-tf3373126.html#a9386736
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
what you need.
Rey..
Daemach wrote:
Good read. A bit further down in the blog he mentioned a push to add
browser-level JSON parsing for speed and security. If you are going to
Max2007 or cf.objective() perhaps you and Rob could bend Adobe's ear to
implement a cfjson tag that emulates
pushing the limit for 'light weight', consider simple tab
delimited data! a simple header and you can convert it to Javascript
in a few lines of code! Not as easy as an eval, but the speed will be
worth it!
On 3/8/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While discussing json support in Cold Fusion
To give you some ideas on what I'm looking for:
The project I'm working deals with a large amount of tabular data. I am
looking for an easy way to bind sorting/filtering to the tables they work
with that would allow someone to filter by month/year in a column that
contains dates in a predefined
Thanks for the response. This is an accepted forum for jQuery plugins, and
the best way to find out if people are interested is to see the response to
messages like this. Maybe it is only me :)
Why this? Mostly because it feels more organized and fits with the general
syntax of other jquery
it assigning the array
elements to an object field.
Does this sound like what you would need for extra light weight
transport? I could draft a plugin, it's not rocket surgery!
On 3/8/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jake, you are famous for this ;)
Sounds great in theory but an example
was slapped together, it was just the technique that I felt
is often overlooked for the lightest weight solution for large data
sets.
I know you can use the technique (and not the little plugin) to
lighten the load!
On 3/8/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand now and thanks
Have you tried setting breakpoints and viewing your error container in the
dom to see if anything is happening?
Rick Faircloth wrote:
Hi, all.
I've been trying to get Jorn's (bassistance.de) Validation plugin
working correctly for 3 days now. Firebug
doesn't complain of any errors.
To test selectors you can also drop $(input.myclass) into the firebug
console and it will show you what it found.
console.log($(input.myclass)); inside your code does the same thing -
great for complex anonymous functions.
Josh Nathanson-2 wrote:
Anybody able to successfully run Validation
A standard for listing dependencies would be handy too...
Beren wrote:
Hi all,
I'm about to finish the plugin I've been working for lately and can't wait
to release, but this time I would like to document it properly to ease
it's
use and upgrading.
I'm quite anal about this subject yet
I need a way to make a field required based on some other condition.
Consider the case of a multi-select for Job Type:
Baker
Janitor
Fisherman
...
Other (please describe)
If someone selects other the description field should be required,
otherwise it's hidden.
{required:function(){return
I, like probably everyone else on this list, is anxiously awaiting the port
of EXT to jQuery. Is there a timeline for this? I am about ready to
rebuild one of my clients sites and would very much like to use the ext
components as a base.
--
View this message in context:
On 3/5/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, like probably everyone else on this list, is anxiously awaiting the
port
of EXT to jQuery. Is there a timeline for this? I am about ready to
rebuild one of my clients sites and would very much like to use the ext
components as a base.
--
View
handle the
demanding animations that Ext requires. But yeah, you can begin using
it now! We were waiting for Jack to make an official announcement, but
it doesn't seem to have come out yet - so we may just announce this
officially, anyway.
--John
On 3/5/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
On 3/5/07, Daemach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I, like probably everyone else on this list, is anxiously awaiting the
port
of EXT to jQuery. Is there a timeline for this? I am about ready to
rebuild one of my clients sites and would very much like to use the ext
components as a base
I'm somewhat noobish, but perhaps you could use a selector with a context?
$(#some div, #frameID)...
Kynn Jones wrote:
Hi again!
(Second question in as many days... I guess I'm the overeager noob. :) )
Last night I watched John Resig's screencast Hacking Digg with Firebug
and
You might try:
$(a).not($([EMAIL PROTECTED])).each(function()
{$(this).after(divpLorem Ipsum/p/div);});
Yansky wrote:
I'm trying to insert a div after all a elements that don't link to my
site. My script is currently working like this:
var getLinks = $(a).not($([EMAIL PROTECTED]));
wrote:
Thanks Daemach John. Both examples work fine. :)
Just one last thing, I'm still a bit fuzzy on the difference between
.after() and insertAfter(). I've gone through the documentation a number
of times, but they still seem to do the same thing (albeit the latter in
reverse
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
