have much
interest in spamming a jQuery mailing list.
--
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell.
http://davecardwell.co.uk/javascript/jquery/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
, the Perl-mindset is probably a
bit of a switch. I agree that something like CF or RoR might suit him
better.
--
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell
web: http://davecardwell.co.uk/
skype: davecardwell
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http
. It
would also be nice, but far less important, if URIs in the documentation
were transformed into links in the HTML.
Keep up the great work!
--
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell
http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/
___
jQuery mailing list
, or the next RC
doing.
http://www.browsercam.com/public.aspx?proj_id=288611
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell.
http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Perhaps unsubscribe instructions should be included in the jQuery footer?
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
Charles Crépeau wrote:
can you please remove this email from your mailing list ,
thanks
--
Charles Crépeau
Thanks for the heads up - I'll sort that this weekend too.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
Jan Sorgalla wrote:
Dave Cardwell wrote:
Actually thinking again, delete from var public = { right down to (and
including) $.browser = public;, and after the var private
= public;
to:
$.browser = private;
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell.
aedmonds wrote:
I recently noticed that a new version of jQBrowser was available and I like
the new features but it appears to be breaking jQuery all over the place
when I try and use it with jQuery Rev 249. It also conflicts
Actually thinking again, delete from var public = { right down to (and
including) $.browser = public;, and after the var private = {}
block, add $.browser = private;. That should work better.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
Dave Cardwell wrote:
Hi Aaron.
I've
I use a public interface to prevent direct access to what should be
private state inside the object. Upon recent reflection, with
JavaScript the added complexity probably just isn't worth it, so I will
be modifying the plugin to suit in the near future.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http
is, and for little extra code. The
above is a proof of concept, not tested, and could probably be tidied up
a bit.
[1] http://jquery.com/src/jquery-1.0.1.js
[2] http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/jqbrowser/
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk
in this way, and thus it provides for a more reliable test.
op = !sa window.opera != undefined,
I thought about using this. Any Opera users have a reason not to?
I've never heard of an objection - this seems to be the accepted way to
check for Opera.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http
of an official method.
[1] http://www.visualjquery.com/#base_dom_end
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
in the future.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
in handy.
Hopefully you'll agree, hence I give you jQWidon't:
* http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/jqwidont/
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
[1] http://www.shauninman.com/plete/2006/08/widont-wordpress-plugin.php
(commendable) effort to make the jQuery source a bit friendlier,
it looks like you missed a stray 'np' in SVN revision 229:
ret = elem.currentStyle[prop] || elem.currentStyle[np];
^^
That should be 'newProp', no?
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell
Klaus Hartl wrote:
does jQuery have a method to transform its results to an array of DOM
nodes? Like for example:
var lis = $('li').toArray();
Hello Klaus.
I think this is what you're after:
var lis = $('lis').get();
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk
on. Fixed now, thanks for the heads-up.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Hi John.
I liked both of your suggestions so have released jQEm v0.2 at
http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/jqem/0.2/.
Thanks for the feedback.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
John Resig wrote:
This is really great Dave - I've definitely needed
at the url below.
[1] http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/jqminmax/
[2] http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/jqem/0.1/
Any feedback, requests or suggestions would be fantastic.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
P.S. Mr Edwards - I know you read
$(window).width()
and .height() in an update to my jQMinMax plugin.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
, John. I've updated the page at
http://davecardwell.co.uk/geekery/javascript/jquery/jqminmax/ and
hopefully the wording will make the use of $.minmax.expressions() a bit
clearer.
Best wishes,
Dave Cardwell ~ http://davecardwell.co.uk/
___
jQuery
21 matches
Mail list logo
