The value for the Hidden field is hiddenValue and not secret. :)
Fixed. :-)
In the case of the checkboxes, if you check two boxes and use [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
fieldValue will only show the first value. That would need to go into the
array case like the select-multiple. But, if there is only
I've taken a stab at adding fieldValue and fieldSerialize to the form
plugin. Please let me know if this impl makes sense. I also
refactored ajaxSubmit so that it passes its options arg on to the
$.ajax method (so any $.ajax options flow right through).
I've got a test page up here:
I often times just need to know the value of one form element and
sometimes that could be a group of radio buttons, a select, a multiple
select or just a regular input. The current $.val() method is limited
only to inputs. I was curious if anyone else needed this funtionality
and if it
For radios/checkboxes: Can we rely on searching for siblings? Or do we need
to search for the name inside the current form?
No, we can't! There may be labels around it or divs/lis whatever in
between... It should search for the name in the document!
-- Klaus
For radios/checkboxes: Can we rely on searching for siblings? Or do we
need to search for the name inside the current form?
No, we can't! There may be labels around it or divs/lis whatever in
between... It should search for the name in the document!
But the document may contain other
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
For radios/checkboxes: Can we rely on searching for siblings? Or do we
need to search for the name inside the current form?
No, we can't! There may be labels around it or divs/lis whatever in
between... It should search for the name in the document!
But the
Currently val() is only a shortcut, but doesn't encapsulate anything
useful. It would be nice to have it handling some more stuff.
I wouldn't like to have it in an external plugin, that makes it difficult
to access or find it when you actually need that functionality.
Right now val() is a
Hi Dave!
Currently val() is only a shortcut, but doesn't encapsulate anything
useful. It would be nice to have it handling some more stuff.
I wouldn't like to have it in an external plugin, that makes it
difficult
to access or find it when you actually need that functionality.
Right
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Currently val() is only a shortcut, but doesn't encapsulate anything useful.
It would be nice to have it handling some more stuff.
I wouldn't like to have it in an external plugin, that makes it difficult to
access or find it when you actually need that functionality.
:32 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: [jQuery] $.val() limited in functionality?
I often times just need to know the value of one form element and
sometimes that could be a group of radio buttons, a select, a multiple
select or just a regular input. The current $.val() method is limited
only
.
Subject: [jQuery] $.val() limited in functionality?
I often times just need to know the value of one form element and
sometimes that could be a group of radio buttons, a select, a multiple
select or just a regular input. The current $.val() method is limited
only to inputs. I was curious if anyone
The API says that $.val() will:
Get the current value of the first matched element.
Yes, it is equivalent to $().attr(value) so it gets the value attribute of
the first element.
The API says that $.val( string ) will:
Set the value of every matched element.
Yes, it will set
On 11/15/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My conclusion so far: Add attrs(), remove val() and other shortcuts, and allow them via a shortcut function.I agree with this, I think this is the direction to go.-js
___
jQuery mailing list
What about select-multiple?
This, of course, does not work. val() will return the value of the
first selected option in this case.
Also note that simply adding a value attribute to something like a div
won't work cross-browser.
Mike
___
jQuery
attr is not an alternative to val. It flat out won't work in FF for
textareas, selects or anything w/o a true value attribute.
Oops. My apologies. I was using a 1.0 version of jQuery for my test.
Ignore the above.
___
jQuery mailing list
I'm just going to reply to myself ... I'm a little confused by the
proposal of an .attrs() method and it seems unnecessary and using
selectors is more than I want to remember or type. Getting ride of
.val() is fine by me but there *needs* to be a method to serialize a
single form element. Could
I'm just going to reply to myself ... I'm a little confused by the
proposal of an .attrs() method and it seems unnecessary and using
selectors is more than I want to remember or type. Getting ride of
.val() is fine by me but there *needs* to be a method to serialize a
single form element.
I'd propose something like $().fieldValue() and $().fieldSerialize
be added to the form plugin. Both could take an optional
successful only argument indicating if non-successful controls
should be ignored. fieldValue() would return the value of the
first matched element, in array form if
That sounds like a good solution to me. It puts the form code with other
form code.
I just started using the form plugin today and noticed that it doesn't pass
along the error callback in ajaxSubmit. I've changed my local copy but I
suspect others might want that as well.
That's a great
That sounds like a good solution to me. It puts the form code with other
form code.
I just started using the form plugin today and noticed that it doesn't pass
along the error callback in ajaxSubmit. I've changed my local copy but I
suspect others might want that as well.
That's a
I would definitely like to see val() work on any form element. I
frankly didn't know that it doesn't. It only makes sense that it
would since there would be no point in implementing the function if it
only replaces $('input')[0].value. I believe the true power of most of
jQuery is the fact that
I absolutely agree!2006/11/15, Paul McLanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would definitely like to see val() work on any form element. Ifrankly didn't know that it doesn't.It only makes sense that itwould since there would be no point in implementing the function if itonly replaces $('input')[0].value. I
22 matches
Mail list logo
