Hi Sunil
This topic has been covered a lot - try a search for 'Design books'
or similar
Here are two great threads:
http://www.ixda.org/discuss.php?post=35729
http://www.ixda.org/discuss.php?post=33808
:-)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the
Hi Marcus
I did some training a few years ago with the RNIB. One of the ladies
there (she was a screen reader user) said that most screen reader
users turn off Javascript for browsing because there is so much bad
stuff out there they frequently end up in an unpleasant and
unescapable loop. If
Slightly away from the original topic, Chauncey I think you raise a
great point... I wonder if the lawyers who insist TCs are prominent
and must be fully 'eye-balled' to be accepted would be willing to
take it a step further and look at the usability of their document?
Maybe creating an index of
Can't we make that the lawyers problem? ;-)
Seriously, I wasn't thinking of re-writing the doc, more like a
layman's reference... take for example Chauncey's case above about
limited use of the clip art graphic. That's really important
information that most people will miss. So the reference
Is the file type and size going to be a decision factor as to which
file they download, or is it just informative?
What about hiding them until mouseover? I just did a quick CSS
experiment using a span inside the to make the file type and size
and same as the bg colour, and therefore invisible,
Jake, I'm not understanding your comment...
*You should never EVER input your password into a field that isn't
asterisked. This goes way beyond someone peering over your
shoulder.*
I've been experimenting with this on a new site and from what my
developer colleagues have told me, using
