Can't we make that the lawyers problem? ;-) Seriously, I wasn't thinking of re-writing the doc, more like a layman's reference... take for example Chauncey's case above about limited use of the clip art graphic. That's really important information that most people will miss. So the reference statement could say something along the lines of:
'Images are only free for a specified number of uses. *link: Refer to paragraph 93* So it was more of a highlighting guide than a summary, and you would have to read the legal version of the statement, but the point is you would know there was something that was applicable to you and would read it instead of accepting and praying, and possibly ending up with a horrible surprise and then feeling obliged to read every legal statement presented to you thereafter... oh the horror! I guess we would need to take a legal doc and test the theory, but I think it could prove interesting and certainly helpful to the end user (ps. I work in e-com web development so my perspective is from the shopping side of T&Cs) :-) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=34863 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
