Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-27 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-27 02:02:56 +0100 Alex Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: How about using the donation money GNUstep got for buying some testing machines which would go into the same place as the GNUstep web servers are and could then be used for testing/developing

Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-27 Thread Adam Fedor
On Jul 27, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: Of course, they would be useful for people to log on to and debug system specific problems, but in order to screen for problems in the first place I think, we would need to develop scripts which would run automatically/periodically

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-27 Thread Yves de Champlain
Le 05-07-25 à 11:03, Andrew Pinski a écrit : BTW, this version now builds with gcc-4.0.1 on MacOSX -- thanks to whoever fixed this ! the only pitfall is that since gcc-4 has libobjc-gnu, A big cleanup must be made or else some -lobjc flags remain that link to Apple's while, strangely,

Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-25 Thread Markus Hitter
Am 24.07.2005 um 08:08 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald: Actually, I'm more concerned with getting bug reports at all ... I occasionally hear tales of MacOS-X users having tried GNUstep and given up because it's buggy ... but I don't see corresponding bug reports on savannah (few appear to

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-25 Thread Yves de Champlain
BTW, this version now builds with gcc-4.0.1 on MacOSX -- thanks to whoever fixed this ! the only pitfall is that since gcc-4 has libobjc-gnu, A big cleanup must be made or else some -lobjc flags remain that link to Apple's while, strangely, -lobjc-gnu sometimes causes linking errors when

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-25 Thread Andrew Pinski
BTW, this version now builds with gcc-4.0.1 on MacOSX -- thanks to whoever fixed this ! the only pitfall is that since gcc-4 has libobjc-gnu, A big cleanup must be made or else some -lobjc flags remain that link to Apple's while, strangely, -lobjc-gnu sometimes causes linking errors

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-25 Thread Yves de Champlain
Le 05-07-25 à 11:03, Andrew Pinski a écrit :BTW, this version now builds with gcc-4.0.1 on MacOSX -- thanks to  whoever fixed this !the only pitfall is that since gcc-4 has libobjc-gnu, A big cleanup  must be made or else some -lobjc flags remain that link to Apple's  while, strangely, -lobjc-gnu

Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-24 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 20:32:54 +0100 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Branching is good in the way that we can point users of GNUstep to a bugfix release if they happen to encounter a bug in a GNUstep release instead of saying: use the CVS version which turned into some sort of

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-24 Thread Benoit
I found another one minor issue for which i have open a bug report (#13893) but I wonder what is the best thing to do for those kind of typo bugs : open a bug or submit a patch ? Oh and this time I have checked the CVS to be sure. And thanks to CaS the previous one has just been corrected.

Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-24 Thread Adam Fedor
On Jul 23, 2005, at 9:11 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: IIRC the odd minor release number (11 in 1.11.0) points out that this is an unstable release of GNUstep. No it's not. I don't use stable/unstable anymore. I don't really even know how to define the difference between the two.

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 12:47:53 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I just tried to compil GNUstep Base 1.11.0, freshly download from GNUstep http) and I found that there is an error GSXML.m at line 5 142 : request = [tequest initWithURL: [NSURL URLWithString: connectionURL]];

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Benoit Astruc
Le 23 juil. 05, à 14:36, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : On 2005-07-23 12:47:53 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I just tried to compil GNUstep Base 1.11.0, freshly download from GNUstep http) and I found that there is an error GSXML.m at line 5 142 : request =

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Benoit Astruc
It's in code which should only be compiled when the additions part of the base library is built standalone on MacOS-X. Is that what you are trying to do, or has something gone wrong with configuration? That's exactly what I am trying to do, but it's quite hard. I am working on the third

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 14:09:05 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's in code which should only be compiled when the additions part of the base library is built standalone on MacOS-X. Is that what you are trying to do, or has something gone wrong with configuration? That's exactly what

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 13:50:37 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are right ... it's an error (I fixed it in CVS) ... but how did you manage to encounter it? It's in code which should only be compiled when the additions part of the base library is built standalone on MacOS-X. Is that

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 14:22:57 +0100 Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BUT ... I don't know why GSRunLoopCtxt.m is being compiled ... it shouldn't be part of the build when you are just building the additions library. Did you know you should build using a command like - make

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Benoit Astruc
Le 23 juil. 05, à 15:45, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : On 2005-07-23 14:38:32 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oups, i remember I read it somewhere but i forget it and use only make. But it changes nothing I have the same error. GSRunLoopCtxt.m is being compiled because

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Benoit Astruc
Le 23 juil. 05, à 15:37, Richard Frith-Macdonald a écrit : On 2005-07-23 14:25:34 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What weere the other two comple errors? Perhaps I can put fixes for them into CVS? Bug #13893 in NSRunLoop.h You have this code : typedef enum { #ifdef

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 14:38:32 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oups, i remember I read it somewhere but i forget it and use only make. But it changes nothing I have the same error. GSRunLoopCtxt.m is being compiled because the make script try to compil the subproject unix which

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 14:25:34 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What weere the other two comple errors? Perhaps I can put fixes for them into CVS? Bug #13893 in NSRunLoop.h You have this code : typedef enum { #ifdef __MINGW__ ET_HANDLE, #else ET_RDESC, /* Watch for descriptor

Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 14:59:28 +0100 Benoit Astruc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think you need to close the bug I have open about the MINGW issue #13893. Ok ... done that. Well now the building of Additions work but the GNUMakeFile want to compil all Tool and failed on some object of

quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-23 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
Am Samstag, 23.07.05 um 13:47 Uhr schrieb Benoit Astruc: Hello, I just tried to compil GNUstep Base 1.11.0, freshly download from GNUstep http) and I found that there is an error GSXML.m at line 5 142 : request = [tequest initWithURL: [NSURL URLWithString: connectionURL]]; should be

Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-23 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 2005-07-23 16:11:30 +0100 Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Samstag, 23.07.05 um 13:47 Uhr schrieb Benoit Astruc: Hello, I just tried to compil GNUstep Base 1.11.0, freshly download from GNUstep http) and I found that there is an error GSXML.m at line 5 142 :

Re: quality assurance (was: Re: GNUstep Base 1.11.0)

2005-07-23 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
Am Samstag, 23.07.05 um 21:32 Uhr schrieb Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf: How about using the donation money GNUstep got for buying some testing machines which would go into the same place as the GNUstep web servers are and could then be used for testing/developing GNUstep onto some more exotic