On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Steve Steiner sstei...@mac.com wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m69796bc5
sounds like version problems.
This is running on a bare system, after figuring out which development tools
were needed, all the version control systems necessary etc. I have all that
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to build the buildbot again on debian and Mac OSX and it worked fine
Didn't try on Ubuntu though.
Here's this very buildbot running on debian:
http://ziade.org:9080/waterfall
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 06:00:51PM -0400, David Lyon wrote:
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:19:44 +0200, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
e.g. like = 'KDEDIR' in os.environ (so meaning we introduce sequence
comparisons/operators
in those markers)
[...]
For example, if there is a
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:18:57 +0100, Floris Bruynooghe
floris.bruynoo...@gmail.com wrote:
All this seems like a bad idea to me. Thinking from a GNU/Linux
distro point of view now you'd need to add a build-depends to e.g. GDM
*and* KDM only to get the correct .desktop file or something like
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:00 AM, David Lyon david.l...@preisshare.net wrote:
So in your PEP, your could have code..
if sys.platform == 'linux2':
gnome_installed = os.path.exists('/etc/gdm/gdm.conf')
Then exposed that as a variable in your condition:
'if desktop in gnome|windows' etc
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Steve Steiner sstei...@mac.com wrote:
The whole idea here is to make a setup script that sets the machine:
Fire up a new cloud server
Install whatever software is necessary
Download the buildbot code
Build the buildbot
http://pastebin.com/m69796bc5
This is running on a bare system, after figuring out which development
tools were needed, all the version control systems necessary etc. I
have all that captured in my Fabric script so we're all set for being
able to duplicate it.
I have NOT installed
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:36 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
I tried to build the buildbot again on debian and Mac OSX and it
worked fine
Didn't try on Ubuntu though.
Here's this very buildbot running on debian:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:46:11 +0200, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com
wrote:
From the stdlib PoV, exposing new variables like gnome isn't
appropriate, because
we don't want to keep track of all desktop systems in the stdlib.
That's impossible.
Well, the list isn't infinite. And under Linux
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:44:56 -0400, Steve Steiner sstei...@mac.com wrote:
I am not looking to hand-fix this, that would be pointless. I want an
automated build script that will fire up a brand new Ubuntu cloud
server, set up the entire environment, install the buildbot and run.
Can I
On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:57 AM, David Lyon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:44:56 -0400, Steve Steiner sstei...@mac.com
wrote:
I am not looking to hand-fix this, that would be pointless. I want
an
automated build script that will fire up a brand new Ubuntu cloud
server, set up the entire
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Steve Steiner sstei...@mac.com wrote:
On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:57 AM, David Lyon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:44:56 -0400, Steve Steiner sstei...@mac.com
wrote:
I am not looking to hand-fix this, that would be pointless. I want an
automated build script that
On Oct 19, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
But I definitely want to run the slaves on Win32.
How about we get it running, first... ;-)
S
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
Hello,
I had a small headache using Buildout this morning: I had a package which
contained a C extension and which was developed in my buildout.cfg file. I
wanted to see what was the gcc call used to build this extension, but using
as much as -v as I could (I stopped at ten), I didn't see
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Jonathan Ballet j...@multani.info wrote:
Hello,
I had a small headache using Buildout this morning: I had a package which
contained a C extension and which was developed in my buildout.cfg file. I
wanted to see what was the gcc call used to build this
Sorry for the lame-ass bug report, but my stack is really deep and I didn't
want this one to go unreported. I just tried 0.6c10 to see if it would fix a
problem I'm having. How fortunate that it hit Cheeseshop at just the right
time ;). Unfortunately, there's a bug in
The long-overdue setuptools 0.6c10 update is now available on PyPI, at:
http://pypi.python.org/setuptools/
Major updates and fixes include:
* Support for SVN 1.6 and Python 2.6
* Fix for the Python 2.6.3 build_ext API change
* Support for the most recent Sourceforge download link insanity
*
At 03:33 PM 10/19/2009 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Sorry for the lame-ass bug report, but my stack is really deep and I didn't
want this one to go unreported. I just tried 0.6c10 to see if it would fix a
problem I'm having. How fortunate that it hit Cheeseshop at just the right
time ;).
On Oct 19, 2009, at 3:55 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
At 03:33 PM 10/19/2009 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Sorry for the lame-ass bug report, but my stack is really deep and
I didn't
want this one to go unreported. I just tried 0.6c10 to see if it
would fix a
problem I'm having. How fortunate that it
P.J. Eby kirjoitti:
The long-overdue setuptools 0.6c10 update is now available on PyPI, at:
http://pypi.python.org/setuptools/
Major updates and fixes include:
* Support for SVN 1.6 and Python 2.6
* Fix for the Python 2.6.3 build_ext API change
* Support for the most recent Sourceforge
At 11:33 PM 10/19/2009 +0300, Alex Grönholm wrote:
P.J. Eby kirjoitti:
The long-overdue setuptools 0.6c10 update is now available on PyPI, at:
http://pypi.python.org/setuptools/
Major updates and fixes include:
* Support for SVN 1.6 and Python 2.6
* Fix for the Python 2.6.3 build_ext API
Hi,
We manage our projects with setuptools. For this we have a local PyPi
mirror with just our required packages. This mirror is specified in
our setuptools environments using the index_url directive. The basic
idea is: we don't want to access the internet when installing
packages. Today
At 12:02 AM 10/20/2009 +0200, Patrice Neff wrote:
So the question would be: is there any way to avoid following any
dependency_links and/or find_links paths and only use the index_url?
Yes. See:
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#restricting-downloads-with-allow-hosts
which
On Oct 20, 2009, at 12:30 AM, P.J. Eby wrote:
Yes. See:
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/EasyInstall#restricting-downloads-with-allow-hosts
which explains how to use the command line or configuration files to
control this. Also see:
On 2009-10-19, at 2055, P.J. Eby wrote:
Thanks; it's fixed and pushed back to PyPI.
With the same version number. What about the people who have already
installed your broke 0.6c10 that don't read this list?
Matt
___
Distutils-SIG maillist -
Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
For example, if there is a /etc/gdm/gdm.conf it is pretty safe
to assume that gnome is installed on that system.
So in your PEP, your could have code..
if sys.platform == 'linux2':
gnome_installed = os.path.exists('/etc/gdm/gdm.conf')
Then exposed that as a
At 02:05 AM 10/20/2009 +0100, Matthew Wilkes wrote:
On 2009-10-19, at 2055, P.J. Eby wrote:
Thanks; it's fixed and pushed back to PyPI.
With the same version number. What about the people who have already
installed your broke 0.6c10 that don't read this list?
They'll see an announcement
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:41:52 +0900, David Cournapeau
da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp wrote:
'if desktop in gnome|windows' etc
Agreed, this is too fragile and complicated.
I don't understand which part is fragile.
Detecting if gnome or windows exists? or implementing this via Tareks
proposal
28 matches
Mail list logo
