On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:17:02PM -0800, Matthew Brett wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I can confirm that Debian and Anaconda builds of CPython 2.7 both have
>> > sys.maxunicode == 0x10, but Enthought Canopy has
On 30.01.2016 00:29, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I think this is ready for pronouncement now -- thanks to everyone for
all their feedback over the last few weeks!
I don't think so. I am biased because I'm the maintainer for Python in
Debian/Ubuntu. So I would like to have some feedback
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> On 30.01.2016 00:29, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think this is ready for pronouncement now -- thanks to everyone for
>> all their feedback over the last few weeks!
>
> I don't think so. I am biased because
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 30.01.2016 00:29, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think this is ready for pronouncement now -- thanks to everyone for
>> all their feedback over the last few weeks!
>
>
> I don't think so. I am biased
On 2/1/2016 18:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.01.2016 00:29, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
Hi all,
I think this is ready for pronouncement now -- thanks to everyone for
all their feedback over the last few weeks!
I don't think so. I am biased because I'm the maintainer for Python
in
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Alexander Walters
wrote:
>
>
> On 2/1/2016 18:37, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 30.01.2016 00:29, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I think this is ready for pronouncement now -- thanks to everyone for
>>> all their feedback
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:17:02PM -0800, Matthew Brett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I can confirm that Debian and Anaconda builds of CPython 2.7 both have
> > sys.maxunicode == 0x10, but Enthought Canopy has sys.maxunicode ==
> > 0x. Hmm. I guess they should fix that.
> >
> > Also the manylinux
On 31 January 2016 at 02:49, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
>> On Jan 30, 2016, at 3:58 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>> I also think this version covers everything we need it to cover, so
>> I'm going to mark it as Active and point to this post as the
>> resolution :)
> On Feb 1, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> On 30.01.2016 00:29, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think this is ready for pronouncement now -- thanks to everyone for
>> all their feedback over the last few weeks!
>
> I don't think so. I am biased because
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On 30 January 2016 at 09:29, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I think this is ready for pronouncement now --
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2016, at 2:35 PM, Nate Coraor wrote:
>
> Is there a distro-specific wheel tagging PEP in development somewhere that
> I missed? If not, I will get the ball rolling on it.
>
>
>
> I think
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 30 January 2016 at 05:30, Nate Coraor wrote:
> > I wonder if, in relation to this, it may be best to have two separate
> tags:
> > one to indicate that the wheel includes external libraries rolled in
12 matches
Mail list logo