Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-13 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reinout van Rees wrote: On 2009-10-09, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Reinout van Rees wrote: I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the install_requires list of a package right now, however. As with

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reinout van Rees wrote: On 2009-10-09, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Reinout van Rees wrote: I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-13 Thread P.J. Eby
At 02:51 PM 10/13/2009 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: Really the run-time code needed to support namespace packages should be split out into a separate package and eventually added to the standard library. Are you volunteering? ;-) Seriously, MvL's namespace package PEP (#382) already takes care

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:22 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote: At 02:51 PM 10/13/2009 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: Really the run-time code needed to support namespace packages should be split out into a separate package and eventually added to the standard library. Are you

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-12 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 2009-10-09, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote: Reinout van Rees wrote: I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the install_requires list of a package right now, however. As with setuptools, why do you think you need to? Namespace packages. You get

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-09 Thread Chris Withers
Reinout van Rees wrote: I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the install_requires list of a package right now, however. As with setuptools, why do you think you need to? Chris ___ Distutils-SIG maillist -

[Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-07 Thread Reinout van Rees
What's the current best way to use both distribute and buildout? Apart from the bootstrap + apparently needed change in buildout, I've got the following questions: - Do my libraries have to list a dependency on distribute or on setuptools? Everything zopish has a 'setuptools = 0.6c9' in it. I

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-07 Thread Tarek Ziadé
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote: What's the current best way to use both distribute and buildout?  Apart from the bootstrap + apparently needed change in buildout, I've got the following questions: - Do my libraries have to list a dependency on

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-07 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 2009-10-07, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote: - Do my libraries have to list a dependency on distribute or on setuptools?  Everything zopish has a 'setuptools = 0.6c9' in it.  I tried putting  distribute in

Re: [Distutils] distribute and buildout: best practices?

2009-10-07 Thread Reinout van Rees
On 2009-10-07, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote: I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the install_requires list of a package right now, however. It depends on what you mean by safe.