-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 2009-10-09, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Reinout van Rees wrote:
I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the
install_requires list of a package right now, however.
As with
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 2009-10-09, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Reinout van Rees wrote:
I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in
At 02:51 PM 10/13/2009 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Really the run-time
code needed to support namespace packages should be split out into a
separate package and eventually added to the standard library.
Are you volunteering? ;-)
Seriously, MvL's namespace package PEP (#382) already takes care
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:22 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 02:51 PM 10/13/2009 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
Really the run-time
code needed to support namespace packages should be split out into a
separate package and eventually added to the standard library.
Are you
On 2009-10-09, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Reinout van Rees wrote:
I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the
install_requires list of a package right now, however.
As with setuptools, why do you think you need to?
Namespace packages. You get
Reinout van Rees wrote:
I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the
install_requires list of a package right now, however.
As with setuptools, why do you think you need to?
Chris
___
Distutils-SIG maillist -
What's the current best way to use both distribute and buildout? Apart from
the bootstrap + apparently needed change in buildout, I've got the following
questions:
- Do my libraries have to list a dependency on distribute or on setuptools?
Everything zopish has a 'setuptools = 0.6c9' in it. I
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote:
What's the current best way to use both distribute and buildout? Apart from
the bootstrap + apparently needed change in buildout, I've got the following
questions:
- Do my libraries have to list a dependency on
On 2009-10-07, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote:
- Do my libraries have to list a dependency on distribute or on setuptools?
Everything zopish has a 'setuptools = 0.6c9' in it. I tried putting
distribute in
On 2009-10-07, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Reinout van Rees rein...@vanrees.org wrote:
I'm still not 100% sure whether it is safe to put distribute in the
install_requires list of a package right now, however.
It depends on what you mean by safe.
10 matches
Mail list logo