On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:49:25PM -0500, P.J. Eby wrote:
In other words, Jean Daniel should retain his source layout of:
wordish-1.0.2/
setup.py
wordish.py
docs/
index.html
command-ref.html
And simply make sure that docs/ is under
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Jean Daniel jeandaniel.bro...@gmail.com wrote:
As a matter of fact, we've worked on this during the sprints, and are
preparing a proposal
that will let people define a place for doc (and other stuff) and let
the OS packager decide where
it lands (with defaults
Ah, very nice!
This was one of the things I wanted to discuss in the sprints. I've been
mentioning this idea internally as well. Having documentation standards would
ultimately benefit the user who could thus have a central place on his computer
to browse documentation for installed Python
On 2010-03-01, at 8:44 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote:
Is the documentation directory expected to contain files in certain format -
for example, with a file describing the Table-of-Contents (toc.xml) that
would then be used to render MSDN like doc tree?
.. and/or make a single-container (eg:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Sridhar Ratnakumar
sridh...@activestate.com wrote:
On 2010-03-01, at 8:44 AM, Sridhar Ratnakumar wrote:
Is the documentation directory expected to contain files in certain format -
for example, with a file describing the Table-of-Contents (toc.xml) that
Hello,
I am looking for the simplest way to package the html files related to
a pure python module. At this point, I would like to just embed them
in the source tarball generated by distribute and leave it to a debian
or fedora package to install them. I would like a source tarball laid
out as
At 10:03 PM 2/28/2010 +0100, Jean Daniel wrote:
Can this be simpler?
Yes. Don't install docs with your package. People who want them
installed locally can just download your source install or use easy_install -e.
Also, if your module is popular enough that people make Linux system
On 28 February 2010 22:14, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 10:03 PM 2/28/2010 +0100, Jean Daniel wrote:
Can this be simpler?
Yes. Don't install docs with your package. People who want them installed
locally can just download your source install or use easy_install -e.
Also,
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 February 2010 22:14, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 10:03 PM 2/28/2010 +0100, Jean Daniel wrote:
Can this be simpler?
Yes. Don't install docs with your package. People who want them
installed
On 28 February 2010 23:03, Tarek Ziadé ziade.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Michael Foord fuzzy...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 28 February 2010 22:14, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 10:03 PM 2/28/2010 +0100, Jean Daniel wrote:
Can this be simpler?
At 10:39 PM 2/28/2010 +, Michael Foord wrote:
On 28 February 2010 22:14, P.J. Eby
mailto:p...@telecommunity.comp...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 10:03 PM 2/28/2010 +0100, Jean Daniel wrote:
Can this be simpler?
Yes. Don't install docs with your package. People who want them
installed
11 matches
Mail list logo
