-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Cournapeau wrote:
Buck wrote:
I have no clue what you mean by 'sdists'. Is this a widely-known
thing?
sdist is the name of the distutils command - it just means distributing
a source tarball.
Nope, by sdist I mean the specific
On Apr 12, 12:46 pm, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Andrew Straw
mailto:straw...@astraw.comstraw...@astraw.com wrote:
On the other hand, sticking the egg into the place that distutils
uses when not under easy_install would fix this much more simply,
On Apr 12, 8:51 am, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
zooko wrote:
It would probably be a lot easier to improve the platform string
generation and comparison logic, as has been done for OS X.
However, it (egg naming scheme on Linux) currently doesn't.
Eggs built on Linux are
At 11:11 AM 4/13/2009 -0700, Buck wrote:
On Apr 12, 12:46 pm, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Andrew Straw
mailto:straw...@astraw.comstraw...@astraw.com wrote:
On the other hand, sticking the egg into the place that distutils
uses when not under
At 11:16 AM 4/13/2009 -0700, Buck wrote:
On Apr 12, 8:51 am, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
zooko wrote:
It would probably be a lot easier to improve the platform string
generation and comparison logic, as has been done for OS X.
However, it (egg naming scheme on Linux)
Buck wrote:
I have no clue what you mean by 'sdists'. Is this a widely-known
thing?
sdist is the name of the distutils command - it just means distributing
a source tarball.
cheers,
David
___
Distutils-SIG maillist - Distutils-SIG@python.org
David Cournapeau da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp writes:
Buck wrote:
I have no clue what you mean by 'sdists'. Is this a widely-known
thing?
sdist is the name of the distutils command - it just means
distributing a source tarball.
Again, please stop blurring the distinction. I can only
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 08:53 PM 4/10/2009 -0700, Buck wrote:
I see the kernel version and architecture, but this is insufficient;
RedHat 4 and RedHat 5 both use a 2.6 kernel, but the difference in
provided libraries are sufficient to make
It would probably be a lot easier to improve the platform string
generation and comparison logic, as has been done for OS X.
As PJE has mentioned, the intent is that the egg name should contain
enough information to decide if that egg will work on your platform.
For example, if it says
zooko wrote:
However, it currently doesn't. Eggs built on Linux are named something
like py2.5-Linux-x86_64. To know whether such an egg would actually
work on your Linux system, you would also need to know whether the
Python was compiled with UCS-2 or UCS-4 internal unicode representation,
zooko wrote:
Yes, if you used symbols from any shared library in an extension
module, you'd need to know the version of that shared library. So it's
not just libc. This is the same on any OS, not just linux.
Wait a minute, an extension module built into the Python Standard
Library, you
At 12:36 AM 4/12/2009 -0700, Buck Golemon wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM, P.J. Eby
mailto:p...@telecommunity.comp...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 08:53 PM 4/10/2009 -0700, Buck wrote:
I see the kernel version and architecture, but this is insufficient;
RedHat 4 and RedHat 5 both use a
At 10:43 AM 4/12/2009 -0700, Buck Golemon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Andrew Straw
mailto:straw...@astraw.comstraw...@astraw.com wrote:
zooko wrote:
However, it currently doesn't. Eggs built on Linux are named something
like py2.5-Linux-x86_64. To know whether such an egg
13 matches
Mail list logo
