Re: Accessibility standards & contribution guidelines for Django

On Thursday, 17 June 2021 at 14:01:15 UTC+5:30 Thibaud Colas wrote: > Thank you all for the feedback :) I have a feeling it might indeed be > easier for me to propose this for review in the form of a pull request to > the Django docs, as I have quite a clear idea of what I’d propose at a high

Re: Accessibility standards & contribution guidelines for Django

Thank you all for the feedback :) I have a feeling it might indeed be easier for me to propose this for review in the form of a pull request to the Django docs, as I have quite a clear idea of what I’d propose at a high level. On testing tools, yes, both Pa11y and Lighthouse would be worth

Re: Accessibility standards & contribution guidelines for Django

Hi Thibaud, thanks for the follow up. +1 on basically everything you wrote! On 15/06/2021 02.59, Thibaud Colas wrote: This distinction between "sites built with Django" and the "Django admin" highlights an important point, which is that for lots of sites the Django admin would be what

Re: Accessibility standards & contribution guidelines for Django

Hi folks, I'm interested in accessibility lately, I discovered a tool that can probably be added to the list: pa11y . It was used for automated tests. I don't have enough experience to give my opinion but @Thibaud you might have an opinion on it. I wanted to check the

Re: Accessibility standards & contribution guidelines for Django

Hi Thibaud. Thanks for this, and for your efforts here generally! 磊 > ...a long-overdue follow up... This is the only bit I can't agree with  — ticking along, slow-and-steady, is realistic/sustainable/desirable/...  You mention a lot of things, so that'll take a little while to absorb —

Accessibility standards & contribution guidelines for Django

Hi django-developers, This is a long-overdue follow up to DEP 11 and the creation of Django’s accessibility team. As part of implementing what this DEP outlines, we need to discuss what accessibility standards