Re: ManyToManyField with multiple model options

2008-11-16 Thread Eric Veiras Galisson
Hi, On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You can't do what you're trying to do in that fashion (using > ManyToManyField to an abstract base class). Many-to-many and foreign-key > relations are relations between one table to another table, not to

Re: ManyToManyField with multiple model options

2008-11-15 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 19:01 -0800, Luke Seelenbinder wrote: > That was a typo. The error I'm getting is > "ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract class Word" > It is a ManyToMany through table, that's the reason it is ForeignKey One of the many problems with top-posting is that I

Re: ManyToManyField with multiple model options

2008-11-15 Thread Luke Seelenbinder
That was a typo. The error I'm getting is "ForeignKey cannot define a relation with abstract class Word" It is a ManyToMany through table, that's the reason it is ForeignKey Luke On Nov 15, 8:29 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 06:57 -0800, Luke

Re: ManyToManyField with multiple model options

2008-11-15 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 06:57 -0800, Luke Seelenbinder wrote: > Basically, I want to allow a ManyToManyField to use any of a Model's > children, like this: > > class Word(models.Model): > word = models.CharField(...) > > class Meta: > abstract = True > > class Noun(Word): >

ManyToManyField with multiple model options

2008-11-15 Thread Luke Seelenbinder
Basically, I want to allow a ManyToManyField to use any of a Model's children, like this: class Word(models.Model): word = models.CharField(...) class Meta: abstract = True class Noun(Word): gender = models.CharField(...) class Verb(Word): irregular =