Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/07/2016 Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> My answer to the question posed in the tittle of this e-mail
>> unfortunately is yes. We have been moving by fits and starts for almost
>> 4 years and have very little to show for it. I would like to hear the
>> opinions of others
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 14:58
> To: doc@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is it time to shut down this effort?
>
> On 23/07/2016 Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> > My answer to the question posed in the tittle
On 23/07/2016 Keith N. McKenna wrote:
My answer to the question posed in the tittle of this e-mail
unfortunately is yes. We have been moving by fits and starts for almost
4 years and have very little to show for it. I would like to hear the
opinions of others though.
(I know this conversation
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 18:24
> To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is it time to shut down this effort?
>
> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > [BCC dev@ (really, this time)]
> >
> >>
[BCC dev@ (really, this time)]
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith N. McKenna [mailto:keith.mcke...@comcast.net]
> Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 10:28
> To: doc@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is it time to shut down this effort?
>
> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> > [BCC dev@]
> >
> >
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
> [BCC dev@]
>
> Please be specific about what you mean by "this effort."
>
> The current documentation approach is to develop materials on the MediaWiki.
> This wiki is typical in that it operates like an open-source project with
> commit then review (although there
