Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Quoting W. Martin Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 2008-09-23 10:11, Jacques Foucry wrote:
I not really use Docbook for my CV but a resumé Library, in XML to :
...
http://xmlresume.sourceforge.net/
I also happen to use DocBook and also xmlresume.
And I like both
Grant Taylor writes:
On 07/18/10 08:43, Jochen Hayek wrote:
Would be exciting to use DocBook also for that.
I have considered (and am in fact putting together pieces in my head)
using DocBook in combination with some other things for something
similar.
Currently I am planning on using
Dave Pawson writes:
From the above, you can see that the html header from docbook is all
redundant?
Not from the above,
but if I want to keep the article separate, then yes.
I'm unsure what an atom feed reader would do with a link to docbook
source in the body. Try it?
Hmm, Dave,
MJ == Mauritz Jeanson m...@johanneberg.com writes:
MJ Norman Walsh writes his blog in (a customization of) DocBook:
MJ http://norman.walsh.name/
MJ Here is an old (obsolete?) article describing the machinery:
MJ http://norman.walsh.name/2003/05/14/how
MJ Mauritz
I really like this approach.
Remko Tronçon writes:
… maybe there has already been an attempt to use DocBook for blogging?
FWIW, I created a stylesheet for integrating DocBook documents with
the WordPress blogging platform:
http://el-tramo.be/blog/integrating-docbook-with-wordpress
I downloaded your
There is no obvious or enforced difference there
regarding internal vs. external links.
I would like to see some kind of accepted or common use of how to mark up
in whatever way *external* links.
It does make a difference,
whether to stay within that navigation system
or to leave it through an
Hi, there!
I guess I'm blind, but I didn't find the sample web-site
from docbook-website-2.6.0 installed in a proper public place.
I thought, it would make sense being able to use that for demonstrational
purposes.
For the time being I put it on my own endless web space:
I thought a little longer ...
Maybe links to the outside world (configurably) always open in a separate
window / tab.
But there could still be a little marker ...
Right, and that can be done within the document (in whatever way),
but also within the code generators (aka stylesheets).
Jochen
not into that, and I don't mind that, as long as it looks neat and
works properly,
*and* it's based on something I know and love and that I am quite familar with,
which is DocBook.
So is that a general and well-know critical view at the HTML generated from
DocBook Website?
Jochen Hayek, the rude
Sina K Heshmati s...@khakbaz.com writes:
Jochen Hayek jochen+oasis-o...@hayek.name said:
Sina K Heshmati writes:
Jochen Hayek said:
Sina K Heshmati writes:
Jochen Hayek said:
(2) Does is make sense, to let a designer improve the CSS for my purpose?
It depends on what you mean
Sina K Heshmati writes:
Jochen Hayek jochen+oasis-o...@hayek.name said:
Sina K Heshmati s...@khakbaz.com writes:
Jochen Hayek jochen+oasis-o...@hayek.name said:
Sina K Heshmati writes:
Jochen Hayek said:
Sina K Heshmati writes:
Jochen Hayek said:
Thanks for the kind words, Jochen
Dave Pawson da...@dpawson.co.uk writes:
Reading http://diveintohtml5.org/ and wondering if people think it
would make a good target for docbook?
Possibly as a replacement for html, more likely as a choice?
Thoughts?
Simply put: that would be awesome!
Mauritz Jeanson writes:
| -Original Message-
| From: Jochen Hayek
|
| Mauritz Jeanson writes:
|
| OK, now I understand (it would have helped
| if you had said from the start
| that you are using the dynamic ToC feature).
|
| didn't I?
You did not say
Jirka Kosek writes:
Dave Pawson wrote:
Structural markup would better match docbook semantics.
You mean those new elements which are not working in IE6 IE7?
http://blog.whatwg.org/supporting-new-elements-in-ie
Generally a move forward from html 4.
From markup point of view HTML5 is a
Bob Stayton writes:
When I go to the W3C website, I see that HTML5 is only in the stage of
W3C Working Draft as of 24 June 2010. If we are going to implement
support for HTML5, it should be on an experimental level, no?
Right, but already for that working draft there are 2 neat
Bob Stayton writes:
Hi,
I'm not quite clear what the question is here,
but I think you are asking
how to migrate a customization layer that was for the
non-namespaced stylesheets to one that could be used with the
namespaced stylesheets.
Actually: no.
I am sorry, should that
Until the other day I processed my DocBook Slides documents with
docbook-slides-3.4.0/xsl/html/frames.xsl
Now I started attempting to process them using these stylesheets:
/usr/share/xml/docbook/stylesheet/nwalsh5/1.75.1/slides/html/frames.xsl
(Although ... the numbering scheme does
of the countries, where these languages are spoken most.
Maybe you came across multi-lingual web-sites before,
maybe you want to suggest a pragmatical way to deal with this sort of issue.
Kind regards,
Jochen Hayek
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Jirka Kosek writes:
Jochen Hayek wrote:
So the multi-lingual refers to a couple of aspects, even not too seriously
connected issues:
1.) With the currenty stylesheets to create HTML from DocBook Website
documents:
would it be possible to extractconvert parts of the documents labeled
19 matches
Mail list logo
