I am in the process of reviewing Hazel's corrections to the published
chapters. On page 32 of chapter 12 Hazel found a dead link to an
external website.
The existing paragraph reads:
Each type of source that you use when creating your document will have
its own unique works cited format. The
Hi :)
The link worked for me. I think the reason it breaks on some systems is
the full-stop after the link-address. If you make it
http://www.mattawanschools.org
or
http://www.mattawanschools.org/
(without a full-stop at the end) then it works.
However it seems a bit weird to link to a school's
Of course the link (as it appears in my email) works. I only repeated
the paragraph text (as it appears in the document) to indicate exactly
which paragraph I was referring to and how it could be changed.
If you had bothered to actually look at the document you would see the
full url behind the
Hi :)
Would it be better to link directly to
http://www.mla.org/
rather than to one school's or university's attempt to reinterpret the
standard? On the other hand they seem to only be available for purchase so
maybe a free reinterpretation is better.
Regards from
Tom :)
On 27 October 2014
You have answered your own question.
Obviously I am subscribed to this list, so please do NOT send copies
directly to me.
Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Would it be better to link directly to
http://www.mla.org/
rather than to one school's or university's attempt to reinterpret the
standard? On
