Lampa wrote:
Hello,
i'm trying to do some delivery notification for each incoming address.
Problem is that sieve vacation has :days but minimum value is 1 eg
period in which addresses
are kept and are not responded to - but that is not that i want.
Is there other extension (in devel ???) or
On 1.2.2010, at 9.52, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
Not technically a bug, but a small waste of bandwidth: it seems (at least as
of 1.2.10) that if neither CONDSTORE/QRESYNC are enabled dovecot still sends
HIGHESTMODSEQ info:
It's intentional. From rfc 4551:
This document adds two new
On 1.2.2010, at 8.38, Andreas Schulze wrote:
In the first case there are *no* Return-Path and Delivered-To Headers.
In the (most common) second case the *are* present.
Why these Headers are not included while using the LMTP-Server?
I guess I could add Return-Path header. I could also add
Hi everybody,
we're currently in the process of drafting our new mailserver-setup.
Instead of a single-server-setup we'd like to have two equal servers
behind a loadbalancer like LVS and shared mailhomes on NFS.
We'd like to use dovecot for POP/IMAP, dovecot-deliver as LDA.
- It's probably the
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi writes:
In the first case there are *no* Return-Path and Delivered-To Headers.
In the (most common) second case the *are* present.
Why these Headers are not included while using the LMTP-Server?
I agree about the Return-Path missing, but the Delivered-To is
specific
2010/1/29 Steffen Kaiser skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Lampa wrote:
My script:
---
if header :contains from [u...@domain1.tld, us...@domain2.tld,
us...@domain3.tld] {
redirect f...@bar.tld;
Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 1.2.2010, at 8.38, Andreas Schulze wrote:
In the first case there are *no* Return-Path and Delivered-To Headers.
In the (most common) second case the *are* present.
Why these Headers are not included while using the LMTP-Server?
I guess I could add
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:06:50 +1100
Curtis Maloney cmalo...@umd.com.au articulated:
I'm happy to proof read :)
Personally, I would rather be drinking 100 proof. :)
On a serious note, I am considering undertaking the writing of a
comprehensive Dovecot tutorial aimed at the new user. Those (like
Hello,
weird lines in dovecot lda log appers:
2010-02-01T13:48:10.108065+01:00 hermes dovecot:
deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: !!BUG!!: binary compiled from
/home/mail/domain.tl/user/.dovecot.sieve is still corrupt; bailing out
and reverting to default delivery
drwx--4 vmail vmail
Lampa wrote:
Hello,
weird lines in dovecot lda log appers:
2010-02-01T13:48:10.108065+01:00 hermes dovecot:
deliver(u...@domain.tld): sieve: !!BUG!!: binary compiled from
/home/mail/domain.tl/user/.dovecot.sieve is still corrupt; bailing out
and reverting to default delivery
drwx--4
Hi!
I upgraded some of our systems to dovecot 1.2.10
now I noticed that some of my messages are marked
as unread. This disappears after reopening the folder
again.
Greetings,
Thorsten
Thorsten Habich wrote:
Hi!
I upgraded some of our systems to dovecot 1.2.10
now I noticed that some of my messages are marked
as unread. This disappears after reopening the folder
again.
Apparently, this is a known Thunderbird problem as discussed earlier on
this list:
I would be happy to involved in this as someone to read drafts for
comprehension by an idiot (me). It's (somewhat) clear to me what the
namespace concept could cover, as is the syntax, but just what they do
and how they are used is utterly ambiguous.
For instance: I think DC uses them to
GREAT!
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yes.
Yes.
:) Getting to Yes! :)
Question 3: When converting existing users from mbox to maildir, should
I delete the index contents?
They'll be created into different directories. mbox is in .imap/ dirs,
while Maildir doesn't use it. So you can delete
L.M.J linuxmasterj...@free.fr:
Unfortunately, I'm using mbox :-/ In that case, --fuzzy got less
interest but --delete-after is definitely a good one.
If you're talking mbox then -fuzzy has no interest, that's right. But
rsync is still a good match, actually a better match than with maildir.
Hi,
Software:
AIX 5.3
dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole revision 1234:7b3db97399de
with
dovecot revision 10621:a978089d090b
I'm having problems installing managesieve. I modified the Makefile because
DESTDIR was not being found.
Here is what I changed to make it work:
echo
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:37 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
echo $(INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV) $(LIBTOOL) --mode=install
$(dovecot_pkglibexecPROGRAMS_INSTALL) '$$p'
'/usr/local/dovecot2.0beta2/bin$(dovecot_pkglibexecdir)/$$f'; \
$(INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV) $(LIBTOOL) --mode=install
On 2010-02-01 9:22 AM, Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl wrote:
I upgraded some of our systems to dovecot 1.2.10
now I noticed that some of my messages are marked
as unread. This disappears after reopening the folder
again.
Apparently, this is a known Thunderbird problem as discussed
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:15 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-02-01 9:22 AM, Stephan Bosch step...@rename-it.nl wrote:
I upgraded some of our systems to dovecot 1.2.10
What was the old version?
now I noticed that some of my messages are marked
as unread. This disappears after reopening
On 02/01/2010 10:32 AM Timo Sirainen wrote:
I guess I could add Return-Path header. I could also add Delivered-To as long
as there is only a single recipient, but adding it for multiple recipients
would make everything much more difficult than I'd like.
I was wondering about Delivered-To
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Sounds like this would help:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/de9d6dae7fe5
Fixed.
Thanks!
Jonathan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 17:24 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 02/01/2010 10:32 AM Timo Sirainen wrote:
I guess I could add Return-Path header. I could also add Delivered-To as
long as there is only a single recipient, but adding it for multiple
recipients would make everything much more
On 2010-02-01 11:32 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 17:24 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
On 02/01/2010 10:32 AM Timo Sirainen wrote:
I guess I could add Return-Path header. I could also add Delivered-To as
long as there is only a single recipient, but adding it for
On 1/31/2010 7:49 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta2.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.0/beta/dovecot-2.0.beta2.tar.gz.sig
Evertithing seems fine but STARTTLS. Are any modifications needed in the
master inet_listeners? SSL works.
Feb 1
Quoting Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi:
On 1.2.2010, at 9.52, Michael M. Slusarz wrote:
Not technically a bug, but a small waste of bandwidth: it seems (at
least as of 1.2.10) that if neither CONDSTORE/QRESYNC are enabled
dovecot still sends HIGHESTMODSEQ info:
It's intentional. From rfc
On 02/01/2010 05:37 PM Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-02-01 11:32 AM, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 17:24 +0100, Pascal Volk wrote:
What about a X-Original-To header?
Is that any different from Delivered-To?
It's a X-$WHATEVER-header.
As mentioned by Nicolas: Postfix
On 1 February 2010 11:32, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
On 1.2.2010, at 8.38, Andreas Schulze wrote:
In the first case there are *no* Return-Path and Delivered-To Headers.
In the (most common) second case the *are* present.
Why these Headers are not included while using the LMTP-Server?
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 19:05 +0200, Warren Baker wrote:
There is also Exim's Envelope-To: header which is sometimes useful for
a catchall maildrop scenario. Fetchmail, by default, also makes use of
X-Envelope-To:. If i remember right sendmail can be configured to add
X-Envelope-To:.
Which,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
What was the old version?
1.1.6
No, those only apply to TB 3.0.0 and 3.0.1 (apparently fixed for 3.0.2)...
glad to hear this is fixed
But the problem sounds really similar. Maybe Thorsten('s users) also
happened to recently upgrade to 3.0?
no, it was my own
Does anyone know if dovecot support regex lookups for proxy/proxy_maybe,
rather than mysql/ldap etc?
I've been comparing it with perdition to see which one might be better
for us to do layer7 username switching.
Perdition supports the ability to not have any auth/db looks, but rather
just
On 1.2.2010, at 22.17, David Halik wrote:
Does anyone know if dovecot support regex lookups for proxy/proxy_maybe,
rather than mysql/ldap etc?
proxy and proxy_maybe have host name as value, no regex or anything like that.
username:host
^[a-d]: 192.168.xxx.1
^[e-k]: 192.168.xxx.2
and so
On 1.2.2010, at 22.33, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You can use SQLite. You don't even need an actual database. Something like
(completely out of my head, no idea how to do it in reality):
password_query = select \
(if '%u' regexp '^[a-d]' then '192.168.xxx.1' else \
if '%u' regexp '^[e-k]'
On 1/28/2010 6:09 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Hmm. See if adding alias_for = for the extra namespaces helps. If it
doesn't, let me know and I'll fix those.
Well, I'm finally getting back to my configuration after a few days.
Here's what I've been up to:
I created these namespaces:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:01 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's beginning to sound like I should add lmtp_headers setting where
you could do all kinds of interesting things like:
lmtp_headers = \
Return-Path: %f\n \
Envelope-To: %t\n \
X-Envelope-To: %t\n \
X-Original-To: %t\n \
On 02/01/2010 03:34 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 1.2.2010, at 22.33, Timo Sirainen wrote:
You can use SQLite. You don't even need an actual database. Something like
(completely out of my head, no idea how to do it in reality):
password_query = select \
(if '%u' regexp '^[a-d]' then
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat shows a bunch of
scripts, one of them claims to preserve UIDs.
Does anyone here have direct successful experience with this? I only
asked about this because a comment on that same page says, None of
the solutions described below preserve the
On 2.2.2010, at 0.39, David Halik wrote:
Back to dovecot, actually sqlite might work, because then I don't need a
database backend, just a local sqlite regex. The question then being, how
would dovecot handle multiple servers? For example:
(if '%u' regexp '^[a-d]' then '192.168.xxx.1 ||
On 2/1/2010 5:47 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 2.2.2010, at 0.39, David Halik wrote:
Back to dovecot, actually sqlite might work, because then I don't need a
database backend, just a local sqlite regex. The question then being, how would
dovecot handle multiple servers? For example:
(if
David,
-Original Message-
From: dovecot-bounces+brandond=uoregon@dovecot.org
[mailto:dovecot-
There are ways of doing this in mysql, with heartbeats etc (which
we've
discussed before), but then I'm back to mysql again. Maybe mysql just
has to be the way to go in this case.
Noel Butler wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 20:01 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It's beginning to sound like I should add lmtp_headers setting where
you could do all kinds of interesting things like:
lmtp_headers = \
Return-Path: %f\n \
Envelope-To: %t\n \
X-Envelope-To: %t\n \
How can I disable mail delivery for a user yet still allow access to
their mailbox from another account which their mail is shared to?
If I put them in a userdb which has deny = yes that just disables
their ability to login, yes? And they would still have mail delivered.
I want to disable
For the duplicates , when an email is flagged , am working on a script that
will remove the duplicates.
Am thinking about the following files:
dovecot.index
dovecot.index.cache
dovecot.index.log
maildirsize
subscriptions
dovecot-uidlist
Will they affect the restore process ??
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CoolAtt NNA said the following on 02/02/10 08:02:
Am thinking about the following files:
dovecot.index
dovecot.index.cache
dovecot.index.log
maildirsize
subscriptions
dovecot-uidlist
Will they affect the restore process ??
Based on some
luigi, can you tell me what will happen if I create a directory in a user's
mailbox and restore some emails there.
now if the user's quota is x mb after restoration the mailbox becomes greater
than x mb.
will this cause any prob ?
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:08:33 +0100
From:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CoolAtt NNA said the following on 02/02/10 08:36:
luigi, can you tell me what will happen if I create a directory in a user's
mailbox and restore some emails there.
now if the user's quota is x mb after restoration the mailbox becomes
greater
45 matches
Mail list logo
