I've compiled the latest release candidate of dovecot and I am
encountering a strange problem when mail is delivered. I have my
installation configured to use Maildir. When messages arrive, they are
placed in the correct user directory, but the ownership for individual
messages is set to root
I really don't want to stand in the way of the offiicial 1.0 release,
and I understand these RC's are intended for bug fixes, not new features
- but I have a feature request anyway.
It would be quite convenient to have support for multiple SSL server
certificates, based on remote IP address.
A feature request is not a bug, so it won't stop the 1.0 release.
I think all new feature request are being implemented in the 1.1 devel
version, so
if your feature is implemented, it will be implemented in 1.0.1 or 1.1
Oliver
Daniel L. Miller wrote:
I really don't want to stand in the way of
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:06 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 3.4.2007, at 21.05, Paul Hamby wrote:
We are running 1.0.rc28 on three servers with 3 Horde/IMP boxes
talking
to Dovecot. The user's home dirs are located on an NFS server
and the indexes are stored in their Maildirs. I have
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 11:30 -0500, Paul Hamby wrote:
Apr 3 08:37:51 app02 dovecot: IMAP(user): file
mail-index-sync-update.c: line 40 (mail_index_sync_update_log_offset):
assertion failed: (prev_offset = map-hdr.log_file_int_offset ||
prev_seq map-hdr.log_file_seq)
Hmm. I guess
Back a year ago, I asked what the key DC executables where that I had to
bring from my compile host to the production imap server to install or
upgrade DC. I was told:
dovecot, dovecot.conf, dovecot-auth, imap imap-login
I recently got DC up and running unencrypted and that worked fine. Then
I get the errmsg:
auth|security:err|error dovecot-auth PAM: load_modules: can not open
module /usr/lib/security/pam_prohibit
That file is 444 root:security
What is wrong here?
Also, I'm using plain UINX authentication, but PAM keeps trying to run.
How do I turn it off?
I'll probably
I am using the base AIX Unix authentication with NIS. There is a base
/etc/password file (though the passwords are in a funny, IBM-peculiar
file, /etc/security/passed) of just 18 lines...since NIS is in use, the
last line is the standard for-anything-you-don't-find-here-try NIS
indicator:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 12:16:08PM +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote:
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc31.tar.gz.sig
mbox + NFS combination shouldn't break anymore. v1.0 still planned to
be released next friday.
- mbox: Give
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:16:49 -0500
Steven F Siirila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RC31 is screaming for version 1 to be released: 31 == 1 binary. :)
You're suggesting that 1.0 will be full of variable overflow bugs then?
;-)
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
Arguing with an
These sound like basic sysadmin questions, not dovecot questions, but
here goes.
On April 9, 2007 3:21:15 PM -0400 Stewart Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get the errmsg:
auth|security:err|error dovecot-auth PAM: load_modules: can not open
module /usr/lib/security/pam_prohibit
That file is 444
At 12:47 AM 4/7/2007, you wrote:
On 6.4.2007, at 23.29, Richard Stockton wrote:
At 12:32 PM 4/6/2007, you wrote:
It would be helpful to me if there were more logging options
available. For example, I would like to see a record of each
email deleted, with the filename (if maildir), and size
I saw some stuff about AFS maildirs awhile back, and dovecot seems happy
being running via ssh from offlineimap with :INDEX=/tmp/dovecot-%u, but
what I'd really like to know is has anyone got a functional dovecot
installation with AFS and GSSAPI sasl support that gets the correct
users's AFS
Brian Morrison spake the following on 4/9/2007 1:33 PM:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:16:49 -0500
Steven F Siirila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RC31 is screaming for version 1 to be released: 31 == 1 binary. :)
You're suggesting that 1.0 will be full of variable overflow bugs then?
;-)
Just
I hate to bring up anything that might delay 1.0, but the behavior I'm
seeing is rather... weird.
I'm running rc31, using userdb static and auth_bind=yes.
With rc1 (what I had been running) I would occasionally get some
deferring operation complaints from LDAP, but very rarely. Every
now and
No. Just typo in the post.
It does not work.
I have change the script to
-
require fileinto;
if header :contains Subject [Test] {fileinto Spam;}
-
Regards,
Steve
Steffen Kaiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Stewart Dean wrote:
Apr 9 14:44:59 mercury mail:err|error dovecot: auth(default):
passwd-file /etc/passwd: User root has invalid UID 0
This is a niggle, but is there something I should do differently, or is
DC just annoyed at what IBM has done with /etc/passwd?
Check out the
17 matches
Mail list logo