Re: [Dovecot] Server 1.0.1 migration: Maildir : UID inserted in the middle of mailbox [resolved]

2007-06-29 Thread damien chambe - EGS
DINH Viêt Hoà a écrit : On 6/27/07, damien chambe - EGS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Timo Sirainen a écrit : On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:28 +0200, damien chambe - EGS wrote: Our Dovecot server had to be changed due to a hardware problem I was forced to use SUSE SLES 10 for the new one,

Re: [Dovecot] Monitoring Recomendations

2007-06-29 Thread Robert Schetterer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dehnert James Sr schrieb: I have a client that I have installed Dovecot 1.0.1 for is having some performance issues. Especially when using IMAP from various Outlook clients. I have TLS installed and all the IMAP connections are secured. I'm

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot help

2007-06-29 Thread Charles Marcus
On 6/28/2007, Andy Fadich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The message does have the X-IMAP Header intact.(X-IMAP: 1183060687 02) The email is hidden when using a pop3 client(doesn't download it), or telnetting an account and using the LIST command. The problem I am having is that within

[Dovecot] Debian packages

2007-06-29 Thread Moritz Mertinkat
Hi there, anyone interested in Debian Dovecot 1.0.1 packages? I have created a package for etch/stable... Could do that for sarge/oldstable as well. Greets, Maurice.

[Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was changed. Copyright is owned by the creator by default in practically all countries, there's no need to

Re: [Dovecot] dovecot help

2007-06-29 Thread Andy Fadich
Here is the fix to my problem. You need to set the ' Mail storage format for Inbox' to 'Remote POP3 server' or 'Remote IMAP server'. I had it reading the file directly (sendmail style single file mbox) Once I changed that setting it stopped showing the email. Thanks for the help guys!

Re: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-29 Thread Trever L. Adams
Timo Sirainen wrote: I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was changed. Copyright is owned by the creator by default in practically all countries,

Re: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-29 Thread Flannery, Andrew
I think the authors' names are sufficient. Andrew Flannery -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timo Sirainen Sent: 29 June 2007 10:15 To: dovecot@dovecot.org Subject: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code I thought about committing this

Re: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 17:30 +0200, DINH Viêt Hoà wrote: On 6/29/07, Trever L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Timo Sirainen wrote: I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers

Re: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-29 Thread DINH Viêt Hoà
On 6/29/07, Trever L. Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Timo Sirainen wrote: I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was changed. Copyright is owned

Re: [Dovecot] Copyright notices in code

2007-06-29 Thread Peter Hessler
On 2007 Jun 29 (Fri) at 17:30:34 +0200 (+0200), DINH Vi?t Ho? wrote: anyway, if someone use the file somewhere else, the copyright can be edited :) Personally, I think that a up-to-date file named 'COPYRIGHT' or something like that should be sufficient. (though, I care only about nice code

[Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Don Russell
I'm using Dovecot 1.0.1-12 on Linux/Fedora 7 along with sendmail and procmail all running on the same box mail is stored in mbox format It's a small system with a half dozen or so e-mail accounts. Each with 40-60MB of messages in various folders. I keep seeing messages about how mbox is

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Jesse C. Smillie
Wow this is weird because I'm about to make this same jump next week! From what I'm reading so far the big draw back with mbox is the single file with all the emails in it. When you delete a message from that file the whole file has to be rewritten without that email in it. If the box is

Re: [Dovecot] Monitoring Recomendations

2007-06-29 Thread Dehnert James Sr
On Jun 29, 2007, at 2:00 AM, Robert Schetterer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dehnert James Sr schrieb: I have a client that I have installed Dovecot 1.0.1 for is having some performance issues. Especially when using IMAP from various Outlook clients. I have TLS

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:56 -0400, Jesse C. Smillie wrote: I thought this study in regards to speed was quite interesting: http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/ http://www.courier-mta.org/mbox-vs-maildir/ It probably doesn't have much relevance to Dovecot+mbox though. Maildir is faster

Re: [Dovecot] Monitoring Recomendations

2007-06-29 Thread Troy Engel
Dehnert James Sr wrote: The performance issues are a) slow response on the lan, and b) unusable low response from remote users. This is always with IMAP, of we switch As a possible aide, have your user(s) run TCPView (http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/Networking/TcpView.mspx)

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The upcoming dbox and cydir formats of course beat everything in performance :) cydir ? Does this mean there is a cyrus-like storage coming soon ? -- Nicolas

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread John Gateley
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:14:42 -0700 Don Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can Dovecot handle mbox for some users and maildir for others? Yes, if you don't have the mail_location variable set, then Dovecot will look in ~/Maildir /var/mail/username ~/mail ~/Mail in that order. See

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Rick Romero
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 20:34 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: * Jesse C. Smillie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The only thing I'm not sure of is what the best file system to keep this on. I have been keeping my home directories on ReiserFS for quite a while, but one of our tech thinks XFS would be

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Mark Nienberg
Don Russell wrote: I'm using Dovecot 1.0.1-12 on Linux/Fedora 7 along with sendmail and procmail all running on the same box mail is stored in mbox format It's a small system with a half dozen or so e-mail accounts. Each with 40-60MB of messages in various folders. I keep seeing messages

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Ben Winslow
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 13:56 -0400, Jesse C. Smillie wrote: Wow this is weird because I'm about to make this same jump next week! From what I'm reading so far the big draw back with mbox is the single file with all the emails in it. When you delete a message from that file the whole file

[Dovecot] Mailbox location suggestion (was Re: mbox vs maildir)

2007-06-29 Thread John Gateley
A suggestion: along with mail_location, create a mail_directories variable that contains the search order, so that it can be specified. It would default to something like mail_directories = maildir:~/Maildir|mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u|... I could use this. On one system I manage, I've

Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox location suggestion (was Re: mbox vs maildir)

2007-06-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 14:41 -0500, John Gateley wrote: A suggestion: along with mail_location, create a mail_directories variable that contains the search order, so that it can be specified. It would default to something like mail_directories =

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 20:26 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The upcoming dbox and cydir formats of course beat everything in performance :) cydir ? Does this mean there is a cyrus-like storage coming soon ?

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 21:49 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 20:26 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The upcoming dbox and cydir formats of course

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 22:16 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: As I noticed almost no difference in performance (no real numbers here, just a usage feeling with 5-10k messages mailboxes) between dovecot 1.0 + maildir and cyrus 2.2.13/2.3.8, having dovecot use a storage format 10 times faster than

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Charles Marcus
All data I have right now tells me to stay ReiserFS though. Even Dovecot's own page says XFS may not be a wise choice. My experience tells me to stay away from ReiserFS as well. Please, lets not start that war up again! ;) Reiser has worked fine for me for many years, but I think the next

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Charles Marcus
On 6/29/2007, Rick Romero ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I know you can do the last with LVM on Linux, and I recall something similar on FreeBSD - but I have no experience with either, and they're both missing salvage and snapshot. Eh? Guess I've just been dreaming then every time I do a snapshot

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Charles Marcus
Just remember that if you lose the index files there's no easy way to recover the mailbox. Well, except by copying the files to maildir.. I'm not sure if I should try to make cydir anything else than a benchmark format or a simple example for writing mail storage backends. I'm hoping that dbox

[Dovecot] wiki.dovecot.org double-escapes capcha info

2007-06-29 Thread Ben Winslow
The capcha on wiki.dovecot.org seems to be double-escaping HTML entities in the informational message, such that the wiki displays Captcha to prevent wiki spam, write strongDovecot/strong here: [sic.] When I dutifully entered strongDovecot/strong, it didn't work, saying span class=errorYou didn't

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Nicolas KOWALSKI
On 6/29/07, Charles Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just remember that if you lose the index files there's no easy way to recover the mailbox. Well, except by copying the files to maildir.. I'm not sure if I should try to make cydir anything else than a benchmark format or a simple example

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Rick Romero
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 16:32 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: On 6/29/2007, Rick Romero ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I know you can do the last with LVM on Linux, and I recall something similar on FreeBSD - but I have no experience with either, and they're both missing salvage and snapshot. Eh?

Re: [Dovecot] connection dropped by imap

2007-06-29 Thread Mantas
dovecot 1.0.1 freebsd 5.3 apache 1.3.34 php 4.4.5 On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:18:38 +0300, Mantas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, when i create imap account in mail client (ex: outlook, thunderbird) it's allright. but if i want login with this account to webmail (i have 2 webmail: squirrelmail

Re: [Dovecot] mbox vs maildir

2007-06-29 Thread Timo Sirainen
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 16:37 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: Just remember that if you lose the index files there's no easy way to recover the mailbox. Well, except by copying the files to maildir.. I'm not sure if I should try to make cydir anything else than a benchmark format or a simple

Re: [Dovecot] Mailbox location suggestion (was Re: mbox vs maildir)

2007-06-29 Thread John Gateley
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:50:46 +0300 Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 14:41 -0500, John Gateley wrote: A suggestion: along with mail_location, create a mail_directories variable that contains the search order, so that it can be specified. It would default to