Brandon,
I just fail to see why adding more complexity, and essentially making
$9K load balancers redundant, is the way of the future, Timo has said
its very safe for index's if non dovecot programs write to the maildir,
so why the hell is it deliberately left risky using dovecots deliver,
I've
Hi, again.
1. Can somebody explain me about dovecot's shared mailboxes?
2. What does it do while searching shared mailboxes (debug_log cannot explain
it)? What files is it looking for?
3. Need i set dovecot-shared file into directory which are shared (if i want to
have separate flags for
Some interesting reading on SHA256 checksum
http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/zfs_dedup
http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/improving_zfs_dedup_performance_via
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 08:54 +1000, Edward avanti wrote:
Halo,
Please can you explain why this is advantage over a hardware load
balancer.
it is no advantage over a dedicated hardware solution, but director does
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Brandon Davidson brand...@uoregon.eduwrote:
Noel,
On 8/26/10 9:59 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
I fail to see advantage if anything it add in more point of failure,
with
i agree with this and it is why we dont use it
we use dovecots
Guys,
We have been trying to establish if there is a way to get some type of
notification from Dovecot when a message is appended to a mailbox or when a
message has its flags updated.
These are the 2 use cases:
A message is appended to the mailbox /Watch, we want to trigger processing
of the
Noel,
On 8/26/10 11:28 PM, Noel Butler noel.but...@ausics.net wrote:
I just fail to see why adding more complexity, and essentially making
$9K load balancers redundant, is the way of the future.
To each their own. If your setup works without it, then fine, don't use
it... but I don't see why
Blaster wrote:
Wiki seems to think you are running an older version and therefore very
little of it applies.
Are you looking at the wiki for dovecot 1 or 2?
At the very top of the wiki for v1 (http://wiki.dovecot.org), it tells
you about the page for v2 (http://wiki2.dovecot.org/)
--
Best
On 2010-08-26 7:34 PM, Brian Hayden b...@machinehum.com wrote:
Dovecot makes the sort of thing you're talking about very easy if you
familiarize yourself with namespaces first. It can overcome most of
the problems caused by historical poor choices in client
configuration.
On 27.8.2010, at 5.59, Noel Butler wrote:
I've asked if it can avoid touching
the index files before (see a thread as recent as a few weeks back),
You can avoid touching indexes:
protocol lda {
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=MEMORY
}
But you still have the problem of
On 2010-08-26 11:18 PM, Blaster blas...@556nato.com wrote:
Thanks for the tip. I saw the section on converting from uw-imap, but
it's still not working. I still can not get to my mail folders, other
than INBOX. I think the problem goes back to Dovecot can't determine
the home directory?
Hi,
I'm working on a setup of dovecot 2 + netqmail + vpopmail 5.5 but auth
doesn't works :(
dovecot -n
# 2.0.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.35.1-rscloud x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
auth_debug = yes
auth_debug_passwords = yes
auth_mechanisms = plain login cram-md5
hi..
im just testing 2.0 before upgrading to v1.2 :)
in auth-ldap.conf.ext i found
# If you don't have any user-specific settings, you can avoid the userdb LDAP
# lookup by using userdb static instead of userdb ldap, for example:
# doc/wiki/UserDatabase.Static.txt
#userdb {
#driver = static
no idea if it matters but
the static userdb sets only the home=.
is it possible to set home= and mail=
because both souldnt be the same as Timo mentioned a few days ago
2010/8/27 spamv...@googlemail.com:
hi..
im just testing 2.0 before upgrading to v1.2 :)
in auth-ldap.conf.ext i found
#
ive added
args = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/home/MAILBOXES/%u/ mail=/home/MAILBOXES/%u/mail
and it work.
Im not really sure about the hole LDAP thing :)
my conf:
uris = ldaps://ldap.example.org:636
dn = cn=dovecot server,ou=people,ou=Server,dc=example,dc=org
dnpass = hiddenpw
auth_bind = yes
In the shell:
,doveadm(root): Error: User listing returned failure,doveadm: Error:
Failed to iterate through some users
In the log:
dovecot: auth: Error: sql: Iterate query failed: Table 'mail.users'
doesn't exist (using built-in default iterate_query: SELECT username,
domain FROM users)
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:15:42 +0200, Toorop too...@toorop.fr wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a setup of dovecot 2 + netqmail + vpopmail 5.5 but
auth doesn't works :(
dovecot -n
# 2.0.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.35.1-rscloud x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
auth_debug = yes
On 27.08.2010 17:16, wrote Jerrale G:
In the shell:
,doveadm(root): Error: User listing returned failure,doveadm: Error:
Failed to iterate through some users
In the log:
dovecot: auth: Error: sql: Iterate query failed: Table 'mail.users'
doesn't exist (using built-in default
On 8/24/2010 4:35 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 24.8.2010, at 23.16, Ed W wrote:
At the moment I would claim that you are just automatically generating a very
complicated filename. If you never trust your hash then you might as well
instead simply use one of the existing GUID algorithms, if
On 8/24/2010 4:19 PM, Timo Sirainen wrote:
It depends on your configuration.. The attachment directory is a setting. I was
thinking that it it would typically be the same for all users, so if you have
two filesystems, you'd need to decide which one will have the /attachments
directory.
Patrick Fay put forth on 8/26/2010 10:21 PM:
Hi,
I am running dovecot 1.2.11 on mac osx 1.5.8. Everything works
perfectly with the application-level firewall off, but enabling the
application firewall prevents dovecot connections. I have tried
explicitly authorizing dovecot in the
Hi,
I'd like to use Global ACLs to limit user's access to individual folders (e.g.
read only).
The dovecot-acl file limiting my user test:
user=test lr
works fine when I put it into the user's mailbox
/home/vmail/test/Maildir/.Records
but gets ignored in
/etc/dovecot/acls/Records
Bellow is
Paul Howarth wrote:
A tarball created from current pigeonhole hg using make dist doesn't
include the files doc/man/{reporting-bugs.inc,sed.sh} and fails to
build as a result. Attached patch works for me.
Paul
Fixed:
http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.0-pigeonhole/rev/241651833da4
Regards,
Mike Abbott wrote:
There is a roff typo in pigeonhole's sievec.1.in. Roff treats the leading
apostrophe on line 54 as an invalid command and produces bad output:
dump to be written to stdout. The out-file argument may
also be omitted, which has the same effect as
Hey,
for dovecot 1.2 there is a very good reference page for all options.
http://wiki.dovecot.org/MainConfig
is there a reference for dovecot 2.0 in the new wiki? If not, when will
be this page online? Thanks a lot.
--
Gruß
Sascha
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:15:42 +0200, Toorop too...@toorop.fr wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a setup of dovecot 2 + netqmail + vpopmail 5.5 but
auth doesn't works :(
dovecot -n
# 2.0.1: /etc/dovecot/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.35.1-rscloud x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS
auth_debug = yes
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 04:04 -0700, Brandon Davidson wrote:
To each their own. If your setup works without it, then fine, don't use
it... but I don't see why you feel the need to disparage it either. It's
I'll some it up put well by someone who mailed me offlist...
mx-in-1 gets the
I dont think we are living in the 19th century now,
I think its time for the html to txt conversion to be scrapped, its
screwed up the paragraph formatting ( and few other things in recent
times I've seen) more than once, making it look like an a5 size book
page.
how about it?
On Sat,
On 8/27/10 11:15 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
I dont think we are living in the 19th century now,
I think its time for the html to txt conversion to be scrapped, its
screwed up the paragraph formatting ( and few other things in recent
times I've seen) more than once, making it look like an a5 size
Dave McGuire put forth on 8/27/2010 10:43 PM:
If this change is made, I for one will ditch this list and just rely
on searching the archives. I get enough HTML garbage from clueless
morons all day long, I don't need more of it from a supposedly clueful
group.
I use
30 matches
Mail list logo
