Is the mailing list traffic (handfuls of threads in the last 9 months)
as indicator of dqsd's waning popularity I wonder?
Have any firefox users played with Ubiquity ?
Tom.
--
__
Well, personnaly I still couldn't live without dqsd and use it on a
minutely basis. :)
The low volume maybe means it's a mature product now.
MLL
tom.corco...@moonbade.com wrote:
> Is the mailing list traffic (handfuls of threads in the last 9 months)
> as indicator of dqsd's waning popularity
Hi Tom,
I dunno, I still use it a lot, but I notice that I haven't had much
time to develop it further lately...
But I notice I often wish it worked differently, not docked to the
taskbar, for example. Maybe new users have found the competitors more
fulfilling.
- Kim
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:
I meant to include this link...
http://lifehacker.com/5145709/make-ubiquity-your-ultimate-firefox-commander
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:21:06 +
From: tom.corco...@moonbade.com
Subject: [DQSD-Users] Ubiquity...
Is the mailing list traffic (handfuls of threads in the last 9 months)
as indicator o
> Well, personnaly I still couldn't live without dqsd and use it on a
> minutely basis. :)
>
> The low volume maybe means it's a mature product now.
I agree, on both counts.
I think it would be cool to have it as a Sidebar gadget, but otherwise I'm
quite happy with it as-is.
--
It's one of the most important applications on my computer. My favorite
feature is still the ":" suffix for the mwd search, because I'm constantly
checking definitions and usage. Here's a post from two years ago:
http://dblume.livejournal.com/65402.html If we checked my history usage
you'd proba
I don't think I could survive without DQSD. I install it on just about
every computer I touch. For some people, the basic "google search" is
all they need and when they discover it can do more they're thrilled.
For myself, I use DQSD custom searches to manage over 150 services,
applications and oth