On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:04:38AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 23:02, Charl P. Botha wrote:
Option AGPMode 2
Does 1x make a difference?
1x makes no difference; still X freezes after a switch to VT and back.
# Option ForcePCIMode On # not
I built with -O3 -march=athlon, thought I'v been doing that for some time now.
ddd reports the segfalut during the pushl of the fd, just befor calling
drmCommandWriteRead.
Dump of assembler code for function r200InitIoctlFuncs:
0x4054eba0 r200InitIoctlFuncs:push %ebp
Hi,
here is mine:
Bus 1, device 0, function 0:
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Mobility M6 LY (rev 0).
IRQ 10.
Master Capable. Latency=66. Min Gnt=8.
Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xd800 [0xdfff].
I/O at 0x2000 [0x20ff].
Hi,
sorry if this is a dumb question :)
I was wondering if it was possible to use Xvideo with the radeon 8500
drivers? I know gatos is more apropriate for such questions, but i would
like to have 3D and Xvideo. For the moment i'm forced to use mplayer
with the -noxv switch...
Thanks
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 20:17, Leif Delgass wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Well, it's not high on my list. I don't think flat-shading is used that
often, and the changes don't have any effect on smooth shading. Actually,
it _eliminates_ some saves/restores
Michal == Michal Bukovjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michal Keith Whitwell wrote:
Can someone out there check this quickly?
In radeon.h in the 2d driver, the size of the radeon mmio area is
defined as 0x8 - however, on my r200 at least, /proc/pci shows the
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 03:32, Henry Worth wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 02:10, Henry Worth wrote:
Attached are patches for r128 on ppc. Rather little change to the r128 code
was needed once I gave up on the char arrays for the vertex colors, and
embraced the hw
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 05:15, Henry Worth wrote:
Henry Worth wrote:
I gave the driver a quick try without the HOST_BIG_ENDIAN_EN bit
set and with the PACK*LE macros. And, the 2-d stuff seems to be working
and the textures do need the PACK*LE macros. So, perhaps the bit only
impacts the
Adam Duck wrote:
Michal == Michal Bukovjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michal Keith Whitwell wrote:
Can someone out there check this quickly?
In radeon.h in the 2d driver, the size of the radeon mmio area is
defined as 0x8 - however, on my r200 at
On Tuesday 16 Jul 2002 8:58 pm, Keith Whitwell scribed numinously:
Can someone out there check this quickly?
In radeon.h in the 2d driver, the size of the radeon mmio area is defined
as 0x8 - however, on my r200 at least, /proc/pci shows the area as
being 1/8th that size:
Bus 1,
On 17 Jul 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 20:17, Leif Delgass wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Well, it's not high on my list. I don't think flat-shading is used that
often, and the changes don't have any effect on smooth shading. Actually,
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
On 17 Jul 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 20:17, Leif Delgass wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Well, it's not high on my list. I don't think flat-shading is used that
often, and the changes don't
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
These look very good to me, I'll commit them. Leif, can you verify they
don't break x86? I'd be very surprised, but it wouldn't be the first
time. :)
I'll give these a try once I've updated my tree, I was testing from
binaries before.
The
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 16:50, Leif Delgass wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
These look very good to me, I'll commit them. Leif, can you verify they
don't break x86? I'd be very surprised, but it wouldn't be the first
time. :)
I'll give these a try once I've updated
Hello,
I have both (PCI) for my fathers computer.
Which one is better?
Any docs? Specs?
Thanks,
Dieter
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
The Rage IIc is part of the more recent GT family and adds improved video
filtering (according to the programmer's guide) and some 3D features
(texturing, I think). Unfortunately, neither of these cards are supported
by the DRI driver since they don't have triangle setup.
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002,
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 20:17, Leif Delgass wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Well, it's not high on my list. I don't think flat-shading is used that
often, and the changes don't have any effect on smooth shading. Actually,
it _eliminates_ some
Hi Keith!
Tuesday 16, at 01:58:29 PM you wrote:
Can someone out there check this quickly?
In radeon.h in the 2d driver, the size of the radeon mmio area is defined
as 0x8 - however, on my r200 at least, /proc/pci shows the area as
being 1/8th that size:
Bus 1, device 0,
It also looks like bus-mastering capabilities were added starting with the
264VT-B and Rage II. That would include Rage IIc, but not plain 264VT.
However, the 2D driver doesn't currently use bus mastering.
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
The Rage IIc is part of the more recent GT
OK, I've got enough info to get an idea of what hardware variation exists out
there. Thanks to everyone who responded.
Keith
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
Michel Dänzer wrote:
AGP has become very stable here since the radeon driver doesn't update
the ring write pointer in ADVANCE_RING() but in the new COMMIT_RING().
Seems updating it 'too often' is no good, for whatever 'too often' may
mean.
Does this also involve the differences between the
On 17 Jul 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 20:05, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I've fixed this for drivers that use t_dd_triemit.h -- currently only radeon
and r200.
Great job! The clipping problems I originally reported with the
xscreensaver gears hack and fsv are fixed.
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
On 17 Jul 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 20:05, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I've fixed this for drivers that use t_dd_triemit.h -- currently only radeon
and r200.
Great job! The clipping problems I originally reported with the
Leif Delgass wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
On 17 Jul 2002, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 20:05, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I've fixed this for drivers that use t_dd_triemit.h -- currently only radeon
and r200.
Great job! The clipping problems I originally
I applied and retested it, looks good. One pedantic little change to
the diff
that I missed is attached, it might avoid future problems.
Another version to fix a typo.
Henry
--- r128-dri-endianness.diff.orig Wed Jul 17 12:02:48 2002
+++ r128-dri-endianness.diffWed Jul 17
email me and I will email you the updated version, it is currently less than
70K uncompressed (it uses the existing site) this version may be up to
double that -I'll try to keep it down in size.
Liam
it depends
---
This sf.net email is
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 20:03, Henry Worth wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
AGP has become very stable here since the radeon driver doesn't update
the ring write pointer in ADVANCE_RING() but in the new COMMIT_RING().
Seems updating it 'too often' is no good, for whatever 'too often' may
mean.
Hello!
I'm using Linux 2.4.19-rc1-ac7, and sometimes the kernel prints strange
messages to the kernel log while XFree86 is running:
memory : c71c43d4
memory : c71c441c
memory : c71c4464
It turns out that the messages come from drivers/char/agp/agpgart_fe.c
Please keep in mind that the debug
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I've done all the others. Lets see if testing was required...
So, should I commit the fix for r128? I've tested that and it works fine.
Yes, go ahead.
I took a look at the other drivers concerning the read buffer fix. It
looks like
Michel Dänzer wrote:
The intermediate variable isn't needed if one changes the macro argument
from v to e.g. v0. I've now basically copied those macros from the
radeon driver and updated the above patch to what I just committed.
Thanks for your fixes!
Took a look at the archive, I had tried
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:38:54AM +0200, Charl P. Botha wrote:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:04:38AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
The code is there but not enabled on x86 yet. Can you try with it
enabled? You need to define PCIGART_ENABLED both in the DRM and the 2D
driver. It would also be
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:18:59PM +0200, Charl P. Botha wrote:
I think I'm going to give 2.5.x (with the 2.4 IDE backport, no sense in
throwing away all my data) kernel a shot to see whether updates to agpgart
make any difference.
2.5.26 is currently missing some of the fixes of
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 23:15, Henry Worth wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
The intermediate variable isn't needed if one changes the macro argument
from v to e.g. v0. I've now basically copied those macros from the
radeon driver and updated the above patch to what I just committed.
Thanks
33 matches
Mail list logo
