[Dri-devel] Re: DRI Mailing list maintanence / maintaner

2003-02-17 Thread Smitty
I think spam filtering for dri-devel and dri-users would be a good solution -- IMO, that would be better than moderation. For dri-patches, the Reply-To is dri-devel. I'd rather have just commit messages and nothing else on dri-patches. Any comments/replies to specific patches, or

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: DRI Mailing list maintanence / maintaner

2003-02-16 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:52:05PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote: On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: I could do it, but I don't think it's a good idea to restrict those who are non-members of the list. Cross postings from the xfree86 lists

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: DRI Mailing list maintanence / maintaner

2003-02-16 Thread D. Hageman
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: What about people getting the list as a digest? Also, the spam ends up in the mail archives. I think a person would have to take responsibility for the choices they make. If you so choose to get the list in a digest then you will have to accept

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: DRI Mailing list maintanence / maintaner

2003-02-15 Thread Leif Delgass
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Leif Delgass wrote: I could do it, but I don't think it's a good idea to restrict those who are non-members of the list. Cross postings from the xfree86 lists are sometimes useful. Alan. What about dri-patches? It

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: DRI Mailing list maintanence / maintaner

2003-02-15 Thread Leif Delgass
What about people getting the list as a digest? Also, the spam ends up in the mail archives. On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, D. Hageman wrote: I have only been glancing at this thread, but basically it comes down to this - If the spam bothers you that much setup spam filtering on your personal