On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 13:06:51 +0200
Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 06:45, Dave Airlie wrote:
Log message:
Import mach64 into trunk - still insecure but don't build it by default..
I'm not sure it's as simple as that... this means it'll get merged into
--- Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This commit works fine on the ProSavage but on the SavageIX there are
two new problems. :(
2D performance is a lot worse now. Moving opaque windows is really
slow.
And I get this from mplayer on movies that worked before:
VO: [xv] 352x272 =
Am Mittwoch, 10. Dezember 2003 02:04 schrieb Alan Hourihane:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:54:24PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 16:34, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:14:09PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:57PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:21, Alan Hourihane wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs/dri
Module name: xc
Repository: xc/xc/config/cf/
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:14:09PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:57PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:21, Alan Hourihane wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvs/dri
Module name:xc
Repository:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:54:24PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 16:34, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:14:09PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:57PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 16:34, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:14:09PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:05:57PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:21, Alan Hourihane wrote:
CVSROOT:
Sorry. I documented the MergedDPI option.
Alex
--- Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 18:53, Alex Deucher wrote:
Log message:
Update radeon man page.
Sorry to be pedantic, but this log message is redundant:
Modified files:
--- Michel D�nzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 04:41, Alex Deucher wrote:
Log message:
*Re-wrote MergedFB validate mode function from scratch based on
crt1 validation
rather than the old clone validation code.
So does it work more or less like the old clone
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 04:41, Alex Deucher wrote:
Log message:
*Re-wrote MergedFB validate mode function from scratch based on crt1 validation
rather than the old clone validation code.
So does it work more or less like the old
--- Michel D�nzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 05:14, Eric Anholt wrote:
Log message:
- Converted Linux drivers to initialize DRM instances based on
PCI IDs, not
just a single instance. Moved the PCI ID lists from card_drv.c
in BSD to
card.h. The PCI ID
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 17:41, Alex Deucher wrote:
--- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The case I was concerned about was multiple Radeon cards, that used
to fail rather spectacularly.
I thought that had something to do with rom loading on secondary cards,
although you may be
--- Michel D�nzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:36, Alex Deucher wrote:
Log message:
Clean up of the mode validation code for MergedFB.
Does it behave the same as pre-MergedFB by default now?
I haven't put back the old clone code, although the code that's there
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 15:41, Alex Deucher wrote:
--- Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 08:36, Alex Deucher wrote:
Log message:
Clean up of the mode validation code for MergedFB.
Does it behave the same as pre-MergedFB by default now?
I haven't put
Felix Kühling wrote:
IIRC, the radeon driver still uses AGP writeback. This doesn't work
reliably on my system and I disabled it in my local tree. Some people
(including myself) have been thinking about an efficient algorithm to
detect unreliable writeback, but AFAICT nobody came up with anything
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 00:11, Felix Khling wrote:
This should make life easier for developers. You'll get annoying
warnings though. For my conscience: it is still a lot better than the
old scheme as the values from the environment are properly checked and
converted before use. :)
Yes, I think
Eric Anholt wrote:
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 10:42, Alex Deucher wrote:
I have a question about the license at the top of these new files.
what should I put for the copyright? Some of the the code was written
by me, but much of it was taken from the sis and mga drivers. Also,
what to I put for the
Yeah. I'll work on that this week unless anyone has any objections.
Alex
--- Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:40:23PM -0700, Alex Deucher wrote:
Log message:
Add Merged Framebuffer (MergedFB) support to the radeon driver.
On
dualhead cards this
I have a question about the license at the top of these new files.
what should I put for the copyright? Some of the the code was written
by me, but much of it was taken from the sis and mga drivers. Also,
what to I put for the top line? the one that looks like this:
/* $XFree86:
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 10:42, Alex Deucher wrote:
I have a question about the license at the top of these new files.
what should I put for the copyright? Some of the the code was written
by me, but much of it was taken from the sis and mga drivers. Also,
what to I put for the top line? the
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:43:17AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 18:03, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:26:40 -0700
Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvs/dri
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:31:04AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 11:13, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I looked at your original commit message and it didn't give any reason
why you did it in the first place.
I followed up to your commit, check out the dri-devel
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:26:40 -0700
Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvs/dri
Module name:xc
Repository: xc/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/ati/
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/26
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 18:03, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Felix Khling wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:26:40 -0700
Alan Hourihane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs/dri
Module name: xc
Repository:
just remove the '#include radeon_pci.h' line from those files.
Also radeon_dri.c contains some references to AMD_SOMETHING that is
undefined. if you comment out that statement all works fine.
Alex
--- Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:26:40 -0700
Alan Hourihane
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:56, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:38, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Log message:
update XFree86 tags use X_BYTE_ORDER
Why X_BYTE_ORDER? I thought the drivers were moving to Mesa in
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:05:14PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:56, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:38, Alan Hourihane wrote:
Log message:
update XFree86 tags use
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 13:26, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 01:05:14PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:56, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 12:38, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 07:22:31AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
Module name: xc
Repository: xc/xc/
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/12 04:23:10
On which server are you doing these commits? From the looks of it,
you're doing them
On which server are you doing these commits? From the looks of it,
you're doing them on the SourceForge server. I thought we weren't going
to do that anymore. Is the freedesktop server ready for prime-time
(i.e., does it have the latest CVS ,v files)?
I guess it doesn't matter at the
Am Montag, 8. September 2003 09:26 schrieb Eric Anholt:
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 07:42, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Samstag, 6. September 2003 23:29 schrieb Eric Anholt:
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:16, Eric Anholt wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvs/dri
Module name:xc
Repository: xc/xc/
There aren't really any major brands that make sis cards that I've
heard of... usually they are sold labeled as 3D video card or Super
VGA card with no discernable manufacturer on the box. some older oem
notebooks (clevos and such) use 630 chips; Sony made slim desktops
(LX-700/800/900) for a
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 07:42, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Samstag, 6. September 2003 23:29 schrieb Eric Anholt:
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:16, Eric Anholt wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs/dri
Module name: xc
Repository: xc/xc/
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/06 14:16:32
Am Samstag, 6. September 2003 23:29 schrieb Eric Anholt:
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 14:16, Eric Anholt wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvs/dri
Module name:xc
Repository: xc/xc/
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/09/06 14:16:32
Log message:
Second test of committing in freedesktop.org
Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone wants to test, [...]
Which video card would you recommend for trying ? I'd see if I can get
one,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
An card from the 300 series sis cards should work:
300, 305, 540, 630/S/ST, 730
Alex
--- Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone wants to test, [...]
Which video card would you recommend for trying ? I'd see if I can
get
one,
Martin.
--
36 matches
Mail list logo
