On Sun, 17 May 2009 08:17:43 +0200 Krzysztof Helt krzysztof...@poczta.fm
wrote:
From: Krzysztof Helt krzysztof...@wp.pl
The intelfb driver sets color map depending on currently active pipe.
However, if an LVDS
display is attached (like in laptop) the active pipe variable is never set.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21774
--- Comment #1 from Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net 2009-05-17
00:33:31 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=25927)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=25927)
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214
--- Comment #10 from Bruno bonbon...@internet.lu 2009-05-17 09:46:14 ---
Regarding Stefan's suggestion in comment #5, that does not seem to help on my
side.
I did try a slightly different approach (e.g. not forcing ALL outputs to get
handled
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214
--- Comment #11 from Bruno bonbon...@internet.lu 2009-05-17 10:21:56 ---
With unchanged refclk (e.g. not adding || IS_I855(dev) signal timing is
correct for VGA output.
xrandr output from Xorg is suboptimal if not even wrong:
Screen 0:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21776
Summary: [radeon-rewrite] compiz crashes Xorg
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21776
--- Comment #1 from Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net 2009-05-17
03:29:29 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=25928)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=25928)
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21582
--- Comment #5 from Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net 2009-05-17
03:33:43 PST ---
I naively commented out the radeon_revalidate_bos line, but then Xorg crashes
at startup. Is the workaround more complicated? This bug keeps me from
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21777
Summary: libdrm-2.4.11 fails with LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sly...@gmail.com
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21776
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Cencora m.cenc...@gmail.com 2009-05-17 04:52:22
PST ---
The problem is already known and exists only in DRI1. Please revert
76a64958a4ca38ec27b63a909979c493c507b952 as a temporary workaround.
--
Configure
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21582
--- Comment #6 from Maciej Cencora m.cenc...@gmail.com 2009-05-17 05:17:17
PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I naively commented out the radeon_revalidate_bos line, but then Xorg crashes
at startup. Is the workaround more complicated? This
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|13070 |12398
--- Comment #2
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21774
--- Comment #2 from Maciej Cencora m.cenc...@gmail.com 2009-05-17 06:10:55
PST ---
I can reproduce it on my rv380.
Can you bisect it? I wasn't able to run bisect below
bbb1c6f6298fcb1125a8170f22646f326b0ca74c because there was dri version
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13294
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gmail.com 2009-05-17 14:00:42
---
No, i just didn't notice this problem before.
Maybe I did not hold weekly uptimes or 2.6.29 didn't leak so fast.
2.6.29 is actually first kernel i managed to
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21582
--- Comment #7 from Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net 2009-05-17
07:22:11 PST ---
It did not crash now. Last time, I had tested it against
76a64958a4ca38ec27b63a909979c493c507b952 so it was probably compiz and bug
21776 that kicked
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21778
Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org |dri-
|
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20935
Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||filipp.andj...@gmx.net
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20539
Andreas Cord-Landwehr cordlandw...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12861
--- Comment #31 from Emil Karlson jkarl...@cc.hut.fi 2009-05-17 16:31:40 ---
Still present in 2.6.30-rc6.
Also the test hardware is being removed so you may want to close this bug,
until someone else does reproduce it.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13171
Summary: 2.6.30-rc2 + xorg-intel-2.7.0 + DRM_I915_KMS =
corruption
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.30-rc2
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13171
--- Comment #1 from Alex Bennee bugzi...@bennee.com 2009-05-17 17:50:37 ---
This bug has additional info on the freedesktop buzilla:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21480
The core problem seems to be that when running in KMS X
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13171
--- Comment #2 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2009-05-17 18:09:42 ---
References : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21480
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21774
--- Comment #3 from Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net 2009-05-17
14:12:49 PST ---
#good 1265e7267e086476d9bae560345fd80f064adfc5
#bad 45435abcb967931c79aba1714ae797a1c5dc075e
#bad 9bbffcced4355ff11e11c5b01c4d0eea6b020119
#won't build
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21774
--- Comment #4 from Tormod Volden bugzi07.fdo.tor...@xoxy.net 2009-05-17
15:04:34 PST ---
I have learned to use git bisect visualize (and Edit View to only look at
src/mesa/drivers/dri/{r300,radeon}) so I will understand better next time I
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21778
Martin PERES martin.pe...@ensi-bourges.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|System locks after changing |XPress 200M :
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12861
--- Comment #32 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2009-05-17
23:22:33 ---
Ok, thanks. Yeah I haven't heard other reports of this; I suspect a config
issue or a related bug, several of which have been fixed now.
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12861
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|drivers_video-...@kernel-bu
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21227
--- Comment #2 from vytautas.liuo...@gmail.com 2009-05-17 17:11:14 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=25944)
-- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=25944)
A simple test case
Actually this bug is rather easy to reproduce, any call
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21227
vytautas.liuo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|intel_tex_image.c:355: |glCopyTexImage2D fails for
Currently, userspace fails to obtain the SAREA mapping on some platforms
because they pass SAREA_MAX to drmAddMap without aligning it to the page
size. This breaks for example on PowerPC with 64K pages.
The way SAREA_MAX is defined with a bunch of ifdef's and duplicated between
libdrm and the X
Currently, userspace fail to obtain the SAREA mapping (among others) because
they pass SAREA_MAX to drmAddMap without aligning it to the page size. This
breaks for example on PowerPC with 64K pages and radeon despite the kernel
radeon actually doing the right rouding in the first place.
The way
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 03:11, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Currently, userspace fails to obtain the SAREA mapping on some platforms
because they pass SAREA_MAX to drmAddMap without aligning it to the page
size. This breaks for example on PowerPC with 64K pages.
The
So, in order to fix a problem with the SAREA you align the map size
for all added maps? Sounds bogus to me, especially since the range of
possible page sizes is potentially unbounded.
Only the requested size from userspace, most drivers create the map from
the kernel anyway.
IMO the proper
On Sat, 16 May 2009 22:05:58 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13325
Subject : 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains
Submitter : Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net
Date : 2009-05-14 15:49 (3 days old)
References:
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and
2.6.29, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.28
and 2.6.29, please
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12499
Subject : Problem with using bluetooth adaper connected to usb port
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki maciej.rute...@gmail.com
Date : 2009-01-13 18:34 (124 days old)
On Tue, 12 May 2009 15:19:34 -0700
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Tue, 12 May 2009 01:40:48 GMT
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13325
Subject : 2.6.30-rc kills my box hard - and lockdep chains
Submitter : Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net
Date:
make with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y warns about the function
intel_lvds_init() referencing the variable __initdata intel_no_lvds.
Since intel_lvds_init might get called after module has been loaded,
intel_no_lvds shouldn't be marked __initdata.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
From: Krzysztof Helt krzysztof...@wp.pl
The intelfb driver sets color map depending on currently active pipe. However,
if an LVDS
display is attached (like in laptop) the active pipe variable is never set. The
default value is
PIPE_A and can be wrong.
Set up the pipe variable during driver
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let me know
either and I'll add them to the list.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sat, 16 May 2009 23:19:32 -0700
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 08:17:43 +0200 Krzysztof Helt krzysztof...@poczta.fm
wrote:
This is not a regression. I have reproduced it in the 2.6.28 easily.
hm, Dean's original report had
This does not
2009/5/17 Krzysztof Helt krzysztof...@poczta.fm:
On Sat, 16 May 2009 23:19:32 -0700
Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 08:17:43 +0200 Krzysztof Helt krzysztof...@poczta.fm
wrote:
This is not a regression. I have reproduced it in the 2.6.28 easily.
hm,
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 07:44:20AM +0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 18:40:52 +0200 Michel D__nzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 18:23 +0200, Karsten Mehrhoff wrote:
On Mon, 04 May 2009 17:07:40 +0200, Michel D__nzer wrote:
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 08:31
2009/5/16 Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl:
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.29, for which there
are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed
already,
please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 17:21 +0800, Dave Airlie wrote:
Now all the DRM debug info will be printed if the boot option of
drm.debug=1 is added. Sometimes it is inconvenient. We will get too much
unrelated info.
This will separate several DRM debug levels and the debug level can be used
to
51 matches
Mail list logo
