W dniu 1 marca 2010 17:37 użytkownik Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net napisał:
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 10:33 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
W dniu 26 lutego 2010 20:01 użytkownik Ville Syrjälä syrj...@sci.fi
napisał:
Disabling the condition check doesn't make sense.
You could use a
On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 10:33 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
W dniu 26 lutego 2010 20:01 użytkownik Ville Syrjälä syrj...@sci.fi napisał:
Disabling the condition check doesn't make sense.
You could use a completion.
init_completion(vbl_irq);
enable_vbl_irq();
W dniu 26 lutego 2010 20:01 użytkownik Ville Syrjälä syrj...@sci.fi napisał:
Disabling the condition check doesn't make sense.
You could use a completion.
init_completion(vbl_irq);
enable_vbl_irq();
wait_for_completion(vbl_irq);
disable_vbl_irq();
and call complete(vbl_irq) in the
Forwarding to ppl I could often notice in git log time.h
-- Wiadomość przekazana dalej --
From: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
Date: 21 lutego 2010 15:10
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] time: add wait_interruptible_timeout macro to
sleep (w. timeout) until wake_up
To: Linux Kernel Mailing
wait_interruptible_timeout macro to
sleep (w. timeout) until wake_up
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
CC: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we
dalej --
From: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
Date: 21 lutego 2010 15:10
Subject: [PATCH][RFC] time: add wait_interruptible_timeout macro to
sleep (w. timeout) until wake_up
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
CC: Rafał Miłecki zaj
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:38:59 +0100 Rafa Miecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
+#define wait_interruptible_timeout(wq, timeout)
\
+({ \
+long ret = timeout; \
+\
+DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
W dniu 26 lutego 2010 17:14 użytkownik Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org napisał:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:38:59 +0100 Rafa Miecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
+#define wait_interruptible_timeout(wq, timeout)
\
+({ \
+ long ret = timeout;
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 06:33:57PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
W dniu 26 lutego 2010 17:14 użytkownik Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org napisał:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:38:59 +0100 Rafa Miecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
+#define wait_interruptible_timeout(wq, timeout)
\
+({
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Following macro is soemthing that seems to work fine for us, but instead
introducing this to radeon KMS only, I'd like to propose adding this to whole
wait.h. Do you this it's something we should place there? Can someone take
this
patch for me? Or
Ping?
Can I interpret lack of objections as permission for committing that?
If so, by which tree should we get this patch mainline?
Dave: this patch is needed for radeon driver. Can we get this through
drm-2.6 maybe?
--
Rafał
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we need to sync with VLBANK for
reclocking engine/memory. The easiest and cleanest way seems to be sleeping in
timer handler just before reclocking. Then our IRQ handler calls wake_up and we
continue
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we need to sync with VLBANK for
reclocking engine/memory. The easiest and cleanest way seems to be sleeping in
timer handler just before reclocking. Then our IRQ handler calls
W dniu 21 lutego 2010 16:01 użytkownik Thomas Hellstrom
tho...@shipmail.org napisał:
Rafał Miłecki wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com
---
We try to implement some PM in radeon KMS and we need to sync with VLBANK
for
reclocking engine/memory. The easiest and cleanest way
14 matches
Mail list logo
