Aapo Tahkola wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 02:17:40 +0200
Rune Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Rune Petersen wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
fragment.position input is not implemented yet. fglrx driver parses
it from VP to FP via a texcoord route. I've been
I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These
were all run with the first timedemo at 640x480, and (for the
open source drivers) with ColorTiling turned on in the
xorg.conf file. I'll list all tests with the open source
drivers first:
x700 + r300 (with arb renderer) - 5.5 FPS
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 02:17:40 +0200
Rune Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Rune Petersen wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Just thought I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These
were all run with the first timedemo at 640x480
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Rune Petersen wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Just thought I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These
were all run with the first timedemo at 640x480, and (for the
open source drivers) with ColorTiling turned on in the xorg.conf
file
Just thought I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These were all
run with the first timedemo at 640x480, and (for the open source
drivers) with ColorTiling turned on in the xorg.conf file. I'll list
all tests with the open source drivers first:
x700 + r300 (with arb renderer) - 5.5 FPS
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Just thought I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These were
all run with the first timedemo at 640x480, and (for the open source
drivers) with ColorTiling turned on in the xorg.conf file. I'll
list all tests with the open source drivers first:
x700 + r300
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Just thought I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These were
all run with the first timedemo at 640x480, and (for the open source
drivers) with ColorTiling turned on in the xorg.conf file. I'll
list all tests with the open source
Rune Petersen wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Just thought I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These
were all run with the first timedemo at 640x480, and (for the
open source drivers) with ColorTiling turned on in the xorg.conf
file. I'll list all tests
On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 22:57:21 +0200
Rune Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Just thought I'd post some updated benchmarks of Doom3. These
were all run with the first timedemo at 640x480, and (for the open
source drivers) with ColorTiling
http://www.nuclearelephant.com/papers/s3tc.html
http://homepage.hispeed.ch/rscheidegger/dri_experimental/s3tc_index.html
And I has problems with one ATI mobile r300 and Xorg 6.8.2 from Fedora
4, and now with Xorg 7.0 it works quite right, and I try to see what is
the trick and appears to me not
FYI,
I downloaded the hwspirit timedemo for quake4 yesterday and decided
to compare the framerate between the fglrx, r200, and xig drivers with
my Radeon 9000:
9000 - xig - 14.7
9000 - fgl - 11.3
9000 - xorg - 16.2
Today I decided to give it a shot with my 9600. The fglrx drivers
On Tue, 23 May 2006 19:18:56 -0400
Adam K Kirchhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI,
I downloaded the hwspirit timedemo for quake4 yesterday and decided
to compare the framerate between the fglrx, r200, and xig drivers with
my Radeon 9000:
9000 - xig - 14.7
9000 - fgl - 11.3
9000
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 04:11:58 +0100
Roland Scheidegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Using umark for benchmarking UT2004 (1024x768 with all low or very
low display settings)... First DM-1on1-Albatross:
9600 - fgl - 11.378239 / 35.393394 / 82.763985 fps - Score =
I had some time yesterday and thought I'd do a quick comparision of the
DRI drivers and fglrx drivers for three different cards I have, and I
thought others on this list might be interested in the results. All
tests were conducted on a dual 2.8 xeon, with a gig of RAM. The cards
are a
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
I had some time yesterday and thought I'd do a quick comparision of
the DRI drivers and fglrx drivers for three different cards I have,
and I thought others on this list might be interested in the results.
All tests were conducted on a dual 2.8 xeon, with a gig of RAM.
Well, I've got most of the FreeBSD troubles straightened out I think. I
went ahead and did some glxgears benchmarks, waiting for the numbers to
stabilize, of gentoo vs freebsd-current.
System is a 128MB 2xCeleron517 (BP6, OCed), diskless, booting gentoo or
-current off of a -current system
Eric Anholt wrote:
Well, I've got most of the FreeBSD troubles straightened out I think. I
went ahead and did some glxgears benchmarks, waiting for the numbers to
stabilize, of gentoo vs freebsd-current.
System is a 128MB 2xCeleron517 (BP6, OCed), diskless, booting gentoo or
-current off
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Eric Anholt wrote:
Well, I've got most of the FreeBSD troubles straightened out I think. I
went ahead and did some glxgears benchmarks, waiting for the numbers to
stabilize, of gentoo vs freebsd-current.
System is a 128MB 2xCeleron517 (BP6, OCed
Quake3Arena Demo Benchmarks:
How To Benchmark:
Start Quake3 Arena Demo
Open console
(to open console with a German keyboard layout press right
shift + ` - the key next to ß )
and insert the following commands:
timedemo 1 return
demo demo001.dm3
after
Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
Hello
I made some Benchmark comparisons with my Video card under WinME and Linux,
here are the resulst:
Perhaps using the new tdfx driver branch 3.1, DRI inbuild Mesa 3.5 and Kernel 2.4
could be a little
bit faster.
It might be a bit faster but I haven't
20 matches
Mail list logo
