Il 06/08/2015 16:47, Tim Donohue ha scritto:
Hi Developers / Committers,
As mentioned in yesterday's developers meeting, I'm calling a public
VOTE around whether we include the Services API refactoring in the
upcoming DSpace 6.0 release. As this change constitutes a major code
refactor of
+1
This is all good practice, industry standard stuff that we probably should have
done ages ago, so well done to the @Mire guys for pushing it forward.
Cheers.
Robin Taylor
Main Library
University of Edinburgh
From: Tim Donohue tdono...@duraspace.org
Sent: 06 August 2015 15:47
To:
Hi all,
Just a friendly reminder to submit your VOTE before our Developers
Meeting on Weds at 15:00 UTC! Just respond to this thread.
By my count, here are our current totals:
+1 votes: 8 Committers, 5 Community Members
0 votes: 0 people
-1 votes: 0 people
Thanks all!
Tim
On 07/08/15 02:47, Tim Donohue wrote:
As mentioned in yesterday's developers meeting, I'm calling a
public VOTE around whether we include the Services API refactoring
in the upcoming DSpace 6.0 release. As this change constitutes a
major code
+1
--
Mark H. Wood
Lead Technology Analyst
University Library
Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis
755 W. Michigan Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
317-274-0749
www.ulib.iupui.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
+1
--
Claire Knowles
Library Digital Development Manager
Library and University Collections, Information Services
University of Edinburgh
From: Tim Donohue tdono...@duraspace.orgmailto:tdono...@duraspace.org
Organization: DuraSpace
Date: Thursday, 6 August 2015 15:47
To:
+1
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Tim Donohue tdono...@duraspace.org wrote:
Hi Developers / Committers,
As mentioned in yesterday's developers meeting, I'm calling a public VOTE
around whether we include the Services API refactoring in the upcoming
DSpace 6.0 release. As this change
+1
--Hardy
From: Tim Donohue [tdono...@duraspace.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 9:47 AM
To: Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Dspace-devel] PLEASE VOTE on whether to include Services API
refactoring in DSpace 6.0
Hi Developers / Committers,
As
+1
I’ve already worked with jpa/Hibernate a bit in our Vireo ETD submission
system, and I definitely think the pros outweigh the cons.
It’s exciting to see this going forward.
--Seth
From: Tim Donohue tdono...@duraspace.orgmailto:tdono...@duraspace.org
Organization: DuraSpace
Date: Thursday,
On 7 August 2015 at 02:47, Tim Donohue tdono...@duraspace.org wrote:
Hi Developers / Committers,
As mentioned in yesterday's developers meeting, I'm calling a public VOTE
around whether we include the Services API refactoring in the upcoming
DSpace 6.0 release.
+1
M: k...@shepherd.nz
T:
I am happy to have an ORM added. I'm not really a fan of adding ClassDAO,
ClassService, ClassServiceImpl for each class, it feels verbose, but I
guess it separates concerns. My coworkers' experience with Hibernate is
that it does 90% of things well, but the remaining 10% is a major pain.
Code
+1
Pascal
From: Tim Donohue [mailto:tdono...@duraspace.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2015 4:48 PM
To: Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Dspace-devel] PLEASE VOTE on whether to include Services API
refactoring in DSpace 6.0
Hi Developers / Committers,
As mentioned in yesterday's
+1
It'll be a smaller job now than later, and the benefits are significant.
B--
From: Tim Donohue [mailto:tdono...@duraspace.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2015 8:48 AM
To: Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Dspace-devel] PLEASE VOTE on whether to include Services API
refactoring in
+1
Bram
--
[image: logo]
*Bram Luyten*
*250 Lucius Gordon Drive, Suite B-3A, West Henrietta, NY 14586*
*Esperantolaan 4, Heverlee 3001, Belgium*
www.atmire.com
http://atmire.com/website/?q=servicesutm_source=emailfooterutm_medium=emailutm_campaign=braml
On 6 August 2015 at 16:50, Tim Donohue
14 matches
Mail list logo
