On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:34:23AM -0400, Larry Stone wrote:
FWIW, some of the lists to which I subscribe mung the reply-to header
to force replies to go to the list, and some don't -- I'm invariably
annoyed by the ones that _do_ mung headers. So take this as a vote NOT to
change the behavior
Hello,
Am 01.08.2007 um 14:05 schrieb James Rutherford:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 12:34:23AM -0400, Larry Stone wrote:
Huh, forgot the g?
SCNR.
You all helped me that much with this thread to change
my habit from r - g. Honestly.
Am 31.07.2007 um 22:30 schrieb Hilmar Lapp:
It also might be
Well, I prefer to have replies to listmail go back to the list by
default, but you'll have complaints either way. The best one can do
is guess correctly which setup will annoy the fewest and do the least
damage.
But while we're talking about this, please please please ensure that
the List-Foo:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
(I hate receiving duplicates -- another religious issue.)
Mailman (which runs this list too, I believe) has a per-user (as well
as per-list default) option to avoid duplicates. It has worked
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:41:41AM -0400, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
(I hate receiving duplicates -- another religious issue.)
Mailman (which runs this list too, I believe) has a per-user (as well
as per-list default) option to avoid duplicates.
Folks:
I'm currently administering the tech dev lists would gladly
reconfigure if the preponderance of opinion is in favor. I'm by no means
a mail admin, and was following the recommendations of the GNU mailman
docs, which I reproduce here:
reply_goes_to_list (general): Where are replies to
For those who haven't seen this:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
There's nothing I can add.
-hilmar
On Jul 31, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Richard Rodgers wrote:
Folks:
I'm currently administering the tech dev lists would gladly
reconfigure if the preponderance of opinion
Hello,
Am 31.07.2007 um 18:16 schrieb Hilmar Lapp:
For those who haven't seen this:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
There's nothing I can add.
It is always a bad thing to be the advocate ones own behalf, but I cant
resist to do so in this case. Unhappily, the article
For what it's worth, I re-configure the lists I'm responsible for to
reply to both the sender and the list. As Christian said, hitting the
reply-all button just isn't a reflex I can train into my users.
Ralph
-
This SF.net
On Jul 31, 2007, at 3:56 PM, Christian Voelker wrote:
The thing is, in 99.999% of all cases you use hit reply and not
reply-all, dont you?
No. I almost always hit reply-all. If I don't, it's a conscious
decision.
Do you ever think about when doing?
No, and that's why when I hit reply
Admittedly, I don't have a strong opinion either way. Most other
listservs I'm on do munge the Reply-To header so that you always reply
to the list. I'd also admit that annoys me sometimes when I just want
to reply only to the sender (and even in Thunderbird, I cannot do that
without
FWIW, some of the lists to which I subscribe mung the reply-to header
to force replies to go to the list, and some don't -- I'm invariably
annoyed by the ones that _do_ mung headers. So take this as a vote NOT to
change the behavior of the DSpace lists.
My mail user agent is a certifiable
The result of a missing reply-to header is that
you have to use the reply-all function of your
mail client to answer back to the list, which
seems unnatural. In most cases, answers seem
to be sent in private mail as implied by the
missing header.
As of my perception, this makes the list
Hello,
as I am actively following the list these days
I am slightly annoyed with the header settings
of the list. I have got the feeling that they
are misconfigured as they are. Prove me wrong
if I havent got the list policy right, but that
is how it looks to me right now.
Other *discussion*
Hello!
I also found this very strange, but i never complaint because the
Horde Webmail has a nice feature, called Reply to List, that i use
very often. Marcelo
Quoting Christian Voelker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
as I am actively following the list these days
I am slightly
15 matches
Mail list logo
