Il giorno dom, 23/11/2008 alle 15.15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On St 8.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Il giorno mer, 08/10/2008 alle 21.10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On Út 7.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Il giorno lun, 06/10/2008 alle 22.09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha
On Ne 23.lis, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Il giorno dom, 23/11/2008 alle 15.15 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On St 8.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Il giorno mer, 08/10/2008 alle 21.10 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
On Út 7.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Il giorno lun, 06/10/2008 alle 22.09
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
pps. There are more bugs in opening a path to VIDEO_TS, even after
putting in dvdread-1.9.7's DVDOpenPath().
Patches welcome. ;)
And I think you meant 0.9.7, not 1.9.7.
Yes, that is correct. I have not had time to look a this. With libdvdnav
On Wednesday, 08 October 2008 at 02:16, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
[...]
pps. There are more bugs in opening a path to VIDEO_TS, even after
putting in dvdread-1.9.7's DVDOpenPath().
Patches welcome. ;)
And I think you meant 0.9.7, not 1.9.7.
ppps. I did reverse quoting here, my apologies. My
On Út 7.říj, Nico Sabbi wrote:
Il giorno lun, 06/10/2008 alle 22.09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hi,
here are my answers. Cosmetics are not problem, but before fixing them, the
idea
of this code must be approved. For file there are 2 possible tag values -
261
for File Entry
Hi,
I think, that my problem is different. I have only 261 262 entries. Neither
266 nor 250 are present. As workaround I propose to use ISO 9660 filesystem as
fallback if UDF access fails.
On Po 6.říj, Jorgen Lundman wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have already posted this to
Il giorno lun, 06/10/2008 alle 22.09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hi,
here are my answers. Cosmetics are not problem, but before fixing them, the
idea
of this code must be approved. For file there are 2 possible tag values - 261
for File Entry (4/14.9 in Ecma 167) or Extended File
Ah yes, I see now. You and I weren't talking about the same things.
Ignore me. 261 (File info) and 262 (Extended Attribute Header) seems
somewhat valid.
Lund
ps. Not related, but FileType 250 (In the user defined range) is a
ExtFileInfo (266) Tag with filetype set to 250. Not TagID 250.
pps.
Hi,
I have already posted this to mplayer-users mailing list. I have DVD disc with
broken UDF structure. I can't play this disc using current libdvdread, because
vob for chapter 37 is not found - entry in UDF has tag identifier 262 (Extended
Attribute Header Descriptor) instead of 261 (File
Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 16.56 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hi,
I have already posted this to mplayer-users mailing list. I have DVD disc with
broken UDF structure. I can't play this disc using current libdvdread, because
vob for chapter 37 is not found - entry in UDF has tag
Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 22.12 +0200, Nico Sabbi ha scritto:
Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 16.56 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hi,
I have already posted this to mplayer-users mailing list. I have DVD disc
with
broken UDF structure. I can't play this disc using current
Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 22.25 +0200, Nico Sabbi ha scritto:
Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 22.12 +0200, Nico Sabbi ha scritto:
Il giorno dom, 05/10/2008 alle 16.56 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:
Hi,
I have already posted this to mplayer-users mailing list. I have DVD disc
12 matches
Mail list logo
