Re: [Elecraft] P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3

2018-03-23 Thread Al Lorona
>>> But who doesn't use a shack >>> computer these days? Me. Al W6LX __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This

[Elecraft] WTB K3/K3S Accessories WTB

2018-03-23 Thread ok1rk
WTB K3 / K3S accessories WTB I'm looking for the following accessories for my K3's/K3S: 2 pcs 2800 Hz 8215 kHz SSB 8-pole crystal filter 1 pc 250 Hz 8215 kHz CW 8-pole crystal filter 1 pc P3SVGA Video Adapter 2 pcs MH4 Hand Mic 1 pc CBLP3Y P3 to RJ45 Connector 1 pc DB37-EL-K3R cable for

Re: [Elecraft] P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3

2018-03-23 Thread Wes Stewart
I've never used a P3, other than seeing a demo of a prototype unit.  I once used an LP-Pan, but no longer have one.  It was a bit too much stuff for me. I expect that the owners of P3s will tell you there is no comparison because the P3 stands alone without a computer.  That is true.  But who

Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread Bill Johnson
I use these options and they are superb. 73, Bill K9YEQ -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 2:12 PM To: Mel Farrer ;

Re: [Elecraft] P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3

2018-03-23 Thread Jim Rhodes
P3, as far as I know, does not let you open a receiver at anyplace in the bandpass. Actually 2, so with internal receivers and 2 software I can monitor 4 freq if I want using LP. Then there is the display issue. If you want bigger display on P3 you have to dedicate a monitor to it alone. With LP

Re: [Elecraft] K3 internal connectors

2018-03-23 Thread Michael Eberle
It would have to be more than $11.00 since the KIO3BUPKT alone is $400. Mike, KI0HA On 3/23/2018 09:08, Don Wilhelm wrote: Wow! $1100 for the parts kits.  I trust you mean about $11.00 instead. 73, Don W3FPR On 3/23/2018 9:53 AM, ke9uw wrote: None of this is mandatory. The cost of these

Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread Jim Brown
On 3/23/2018 11:33 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: I think there will be more information to come about its function. For the time being, it is safe to assume it is not a calibrated output, but simply a tap to observe the output waveform, rather than an amplitude measuring device. The most obvious

Re: [Elecraft] P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3

2018-03-23 Thread George Thornton
I too had the LP-Pan before the K3. Computers can be finicky and I found using the LP-Pan to be at times difficult to keep running. I also did not find it easy to adjust the scale ranges to make the graphics displays optimized for what I wanted to do. By contrast, the P3 was easy to set up

Re: [Elecraft] P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3

2018-03-23 Thread Fred Jensen
I tried LP-Pan and NaP3 before buying my P3. Panadapter displays are sort of like the urban legend that all snowflakes are different ... after a year in the northern interior of AK, I can assure you ... "seen one, you've seen 'em all." However, like all Elecraft gear, the  integration between

[Elecraft] P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3

2018-03-23 Thread Dick Dickinson
Perhaps an individual's goals and criteria could make it a little less 'apples to oranges.' Dick - KA5KKT Bill DeVore maxrcul at gmail.com Fri Mar 23 14:55:17 EDT 2018 Is a P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3 a fair comparison?

Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
The P3 TX monitor and SWR/Wattmeter option also does a great job at this. :-) 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 3/23/2018 11:55 AM, Mel Farrer via Elecraft wrote: While all of the info is correct, I also like to mention that an inline station monitor is also a great device.  I use a old Kenwood

Re: [Elecraft] OT: Postal terminology

2018-03-23 Thread Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft
Folks - please read my earlier post.   -Do Not-  tell others that their topic is inappropriate or that it should be dropped from the Elecraft list. That is both rude and frequently incorrect. Email the moderator and we will make that determination when needed. List members attempting to

Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread Mel Farrer via Elecraft
While all of the info is correct, I also like to mention that an inline station monitor is also a great device.  I use a old Kenwood SM-220 as a permenant part of the station.  That lets me see the RF amplitude and the linearity of the signal.  The trapozoid is used mostly to keep tabs on any

[Elecraft] P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3

2018-03-23 Thread Bill DeVore
Is a P3 vs LP-Pan / NaP3 a fair comparison? Am I trying to compare apples to oranges? Bill - W3PNM __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post:

Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread Don Wilhelm
Dave, Since that "coupler" has only one output, it is not a full forward and reverse coupler, so it could be nothing more than a toroid output with the wire carrying the full output going through the center of the core - in other words, it can just be an "RF Sampler", and in that case it

Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread David Box
Don Was fairly certain that units were used incorrect but ya' never know so appreciate confirmation. Wanting to get linearity test ready so now I know what is needed to set up.  I always want to monitor a new amp and the inclusion of this output allows that. Now I do have one other

Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread Don Wilhelm
David, It is just a coupler - nothing else makes sense for that use, so your -60dB assumption is correct. Yes, it is relative to the output, so dBm is not the proper designation. 73, Don W3FPR On 3/23/2018 10:09 AM, David Box wrote: I am trying to get ready for delivery of the KPA1500 and

Re: [Elecraft] K3 internal connectors

2018-03-23 Thread Brian Hunt
My K3 is also from 2010, April as I recall. I recently did the component mods you mentioned except for the KREF3 and KPOD resistors. Also I added the general coverage BPF board with 472 kHz in mind. I added the new synthesizer as soon as it came out. It all went very well and only took a few

Re: [Elecraft] K3 internal connectors

2018-03-23 Thread Don Wilhelm
Chuck, Sorry, I misunderstood - I did not consider that you were adding the new synth cards and the other upgrades. Other than the upgrades to bring the K3 as close to the K3S as possible, the parts for the other basic K3 mod kits is quite small. 73, Don W3FPR On 3/23/2018 10:18 AM,

Re: [Elecraft] K3 internal connectors

2018-03-23 Thread Don Wilhelm
Wow! $1100 for the parts kits. I trust you mean about $11.00 instead. 73, Don W3FPR On 3/23/2018 9:53 AM, ke9uw wrote: None of this is mandatory. The cost of these updates would cost about $1100 in parts kits. __ Elecraft

Re: [Elecraft] K3 internal connectors

2018-03-23 Thread hawley, charles j jr
No. The synthesizers (2 of them) and the USB Sound and Comm port update total around $960 to add. I might have rounded up too casually for shipping and the other mod kits which are around 10 dollars each, some free. So maybe $1000. Chuck Hawley c-haw...@illinois.edu Amateur Radio, KE9UW aka

[Elecraft] KPA1500 TX Sample

2018-03-23 Thread David Box
I am trying to get ready for delivery of the KPA1500 and have become confused about the information available for the TX Sample port. The only information I can find states that this is a low-level signal of -60dBm but dBm is a measure of absolute power which would put this signal at 1

Re: [Elecraft] K3 internal connectors

2018-03-23 Thread ke9uw
My K3 was purchased in 2010 which seems to avoid most of the early required mods. The optional mods that came after 2010 are: the 12vdc current update at the rear panel, the additional speaker audio output protection, the additional bandwidth capacitor from 100KHz to 500KHz (which requires

[Elecraft] FS: XV144 Transverter (Reduced)

2018-03-23 Thread Steve Muenich
For Sale: Asking Price reduced XV-144 external 2 meter transverter. Complete with all interconnection RF, DC and data cables. Copy of manual Transverter works and looks great. $325 Shipped CONUS. Steve, NA5C Sent from my mobile device

Re: [Elecraft] OT: Postal terminology

2018-03-23 Thread a45wg
Well Said Or go back to shipping in multiple Boxes !! > On Mar 23, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Andy McMullin wrote: > > Now unlike the use of Elecraft supplied software on Linux - the problems and > reminiscences about the US postal service is a subject that should be

Re: [Elecraft] OT: Postal terminology

2018-03-23 Thread Andy McMullin
Now unlike the use of Elecraft supplied software on Linux - the problems and reminiscences about the US postal service is a subject that should be dropped! It’s of absolutely no interest to the world - just the USA. Has nothing to do with a Elecraft hardware or software. Has nothing to do with