On 9/27/2010 4:30 PM, Bill Myers wrote:
I'm trying to remember why I wanted a FSK-capable radio for RTTY.
I've done thousands of RTTY Qs in contests, sometimes scoring fairly
well, and I've NEVER used FSK. If you're using a radio that allows you
to put the AFSK tones in the center of the
On 9/27/2010 4:30 PM, Bill Myers wrote:
I'm trying to remember why I wanted a FSK-capable radio for RTTY.
I've done thousands of RTTY Qs in contests, sometimes scoring fairly
well, and I've NEVER used FSK. If you're using a radio that allows you
to put the AFSK tones in the center of
Thanks to all - your help was conclusive. There is certainly no need to
switch from AFSK. The filter issue was the reason my pre-K3 setups were not
quite satisfactory!
So, I get to use that serial port for some other toy. That's a good thing!
73
Bill
--
View this message in context:
I'm trying to remember why I wanted a FSK-capable radio for RTTY. Before
(the K3), I have used sound-card programs (MMTTY, WriteLog) - now I have the
option. As I am a little short on serial ports, I initially set up the K3
using AFSK. Why should I switch?
Bill K6IFF
--
View this message in
On 9/27/2010 4:30 PM, Bill Myers wrote:
I'm trying to remember why I wanted a FSK-capable radio for RTTY. Before
(the K3), I have used sound-card programs (MMTTY, WriteLog) - now I have the
option. As I am a little short on serial ports, I initially set up the K3
using AFSK. Why should I
Bill,
You have a successful setup, so why even consider switching. There is
no difference between FSK and AFSK on the receiving end. The major
difference on the transmitting end is that FSK is more tolerant of
things like the mark frequency setting, but other than that, I cannot
find any
6 matches
Mail list logo