Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
Is this actually true? I'm not clear on what happened in the US with no longer requiring a Morse cert. and would like someone to set me straight (I really mean that, I'd like to understand the real story). My understanding is: 1) the requirement for a morse cert was removed from the license

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Shaun Oliver
you know, once you remove the requirement for someone to do something in order to gain a qualification or a certificate of proficiency, or the like, there's more insentive to go learn it for the fun of it. if you're required to do the thing, then it's alot less enjoyable. On 19/03/2008 10:35

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Jan Erik Holm
David Ferrington, M0XDF wrote: In the UK, this same action in 2003 has resulted in more newcomers (since Morse is no longer an obstacle) and in fact, more people wishing to learn Morse (myself included) since on using HF, it becomes clear just how significant CW is to making contacts,

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Shaun Oliver
I think I'd agree with that assessment also. it takes a certain mindset to use morse and not everybody is built for it. having said that, it doesn't mean the practise should die out. On 19/03/2008 11:17 PM, the old scribe known as Jan Erik Holm was able to impart this pearl of wisdom: David

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Ken, KA0W
Listening from my QTH it appears activity is low on all modes, including local 2m FM which died to nothing 10 years ago. 40m CW activity has lessened in the past few years, but it's still the place to be. 80m CW is sad, nothing there unless a weekend contest. On higher frequencies unable to tell

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread David Ferrington, M0XDF
I am a ham now simply because I became aware that I didn't need Morse - in my mind I had discounted being a ham, because I always thought Morse was a requirement (from the age of 16). I wasn't aware of the class B license (right term?) and it wasn't until I was involved in an International

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Sandy
W4ZV [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 6:35 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT] Is this actually true? I'm not clear on what happened in the US with no longer requiring a Morse cert. and would like someone to set me straight (I

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Michael Brown
Although there isn't as much cw on during non-contest times as there was when I was licensed in '79, there are a number of ragchews going on during the day on 40m during the day and some dx at night/early morning here in the Midwest. I'd like for the people who think CW is dead to listen to

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Dave Lowenstein
There is way less casual CW operation than there was in '79, '89, and even '99. Except for contesting and DXing, CW is close to being dead. Foreign phones, RTTY data stations in the lower portions of the CW bands and the ARRL/FCC elimination of CW-testing will finish it off. If I thought there

[Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Bill Tippett
N7AF: There is way less casual CW operation than there was in '79, '89, and even '99. Except for contesting and DXing, CW is close to being dead. Foreign phones, RTTY data stations in the lower portions of the CW bands and the ARRL/FCC elimination of CW-testing will finish it off. If I

Re: [Elecraft] New Contest Transceiver [OT]

2008-03-19 Thread Gary D Krause
I'm a casual CW operator and I like to rag chew. I agree that there is less activity than in past years. One indication for me is that I keep working the same stations which rarely happened when I was first licensed. I am also another one this is hesitant to order a K3 at this time. The K2