RE: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-11 Thread Mike Morrow
Ron wrote: The advantage of low dipoles on slopes for DX noted by Moxon is that the earth behind the radiator acts as a reflector. For an HF dipole installed along a stony cliff or bluff, I've always had my doubts that the earth and stone behind the dipole act much like an effective ground

Re: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-11 Thread Paul Gates
the program on NVIS antennas and he is writing an article for QST. Paul Gates K1 #0231 KX1 #1186 XG1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Mike Morrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'elecraft' elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 1:19 PM Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Low antennas

Re: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-11 Thread Stuart Rohre
No matter what the ground conductivity is at a given hill top located antenna, what is shown in one ARRL Antenna Compendium piece on gains from an antenna near the edge of, and atop a hill, is that you are no longer shadowing say, a dipole parallel to the cliff face from radiating at angles

Re: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-10 Thread Stuart Rohre
This past Field Day, we used some NVIS dipoles atop a hill in Austin TX. There was a sharp drop to the east and to the West. We not only worked obvious NVIS range signals; but worked a number of skip signals from antennas no more than 7 feet high at the highest. The 40m antenna was only 3 1/2

Re: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-10 Thread Stuart Rohre
Paul, NVIS (Near Vertical Incidence Skywave) dipoles or antennas are any antenna operated at low elevations above ground from lying on ground to being say 0.1 wave high, and certainly well below conventional heights for that antenna. They are horizontal dipoles usually a half wave type, or

RE: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-10 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Stuart wrote: NVIS (Near Vertical Incidence Skywave) dipoles or antennas are any antenna operated at low elevations above ground from lying on ground to being say 0.1 wave high, and certainly well below conventional heights for that antenna. --- The optimum height

RE: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-09 Thread James Kern
I just used a portable inverted vee fed with 300 ohm ladder line and the elecraft 4:1 balun during our camping trip up in the hills of northwest NJ. The K2 heard like a hawk. I had it up about 30 feet and the ends were maybe 8-10 feet off the ground. 1st QSO I snagged Switzerland on 40 meters

RE: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-09 Thread EricJ
Vic, I have noticed the effect in the San Jacinto Mtns east of here. I was at around 8000'. I layed out my end-fed wire as a sloper with the low end pointing east on relatively flat terrain at the campground. I later moved it so that it sloped from the edge of a drop off down to a scrubby tree on

Re: [Elecraft] Low antennas in high places

2005-08-09 Thread Mike Morrow
Vic wrote: I would like to correspond with anyone who has tried portable QRP operation from a high location, using a low horizontal antenna at the edge of a sharp dropoff. I always got great results operating from a bluff on Arkansas' Mount Magazine and similar locations, by running the ends