[Elecraft] N2CQ QRP Contest Calendar - August 2004

2004-07-28 Thread Ken Newman
~~~
N2CQ QRP CONTEST CALENDAR 
August 2004
~~~
Summer FOX Hunt - CW:
Every Friday (UTC) through August 20 (UTC) 0100z to 0300z 
(9 PM - 11 PM EDT Thurs evening US/Canada)
Info: http://www.cqc.org/fox/

Truffle Hunt - CW:
30 min before CW Fox hunt. 
Info: http://fpqrp.com/struffle.html

Summer SSB Fox Hunts: 
Every Friday (UTC) through August 20 (UTC) z to 0100z
(8 PM - 9 PM EDT Thurs evening US/Canada) 
Info: http://www.zianet.com/k5di/ssbfox.htm
~~~
Adventure Radio Spartan Sprint (CW) *** QRP CONTEST! ***
Aug 3, 0100z to 0300z (Monday Evenings US/Can local time)
Rules:  http://www.arsqrp.com/
~~~
TARA Grid Dip Contest  (PSK/RTTY) ... QRP Category
Aug 7, z to 2400z
Rules: http://www.n2ty.org/seasons/tara_grid_rules.html
~~~
Ten-Ten Summer SSB Contest ... QRP Category
Aug 7, 0001z to Aug 8, 2359z 
Rules: http://www.ten-ten.org/calendar.html
~~~
EUROPEAN HF CHAMPIONSHIP (PH/CW) (EU work EU) Low Power Category
Aug 7, 1200z to 2359z
Rules: http://lea.hamradio.si/~scc/euhfcrules-04.htm
~~~
ARRL UHF Contest ... Low Power Category
Aug 7, 1800z to Aug 8, 1800z
Rules: http://www.arrl.org/contests/rules/2004/uhf.html
~~~
North American QSO Party (CW) ... 100W Max.  (/QRP noted on entry)
Aug 7, 1800z to Aug 8, 0600z
Rules: http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php
~~~
Worked All Europe DX Contest (CW) ... 100W category
Aug 14, z to Aug 15, 2359z
Rules: http://www.darc.de/referate/dx/xedcwr.htm
~~~
Maryland/DC QSO Party (SSB/CW) ... QRP Category
Aug 14, 1600z to Aug 15, 0400z
Aug 15, 1600z to Aug 15, 2359z
Rules: http://www.w3cwc.org
~~~
RUN FOR THE BACON (CW) *** QRP CONTEST! ***
Aug 16, 0100z to 0300z
Rules: http://fpqrp.com/fpqrprun.html
~~~
SARTG WW RTTY Contest ... Low Power Category
Aug 21, z to 0800z
Aug 21, 1600z to 2400z
Aug 22, 0800z to 1600z
Rules: http://www.sartg.com/contest/wwrules.htm
~~~
North American QSO Party (SSB) ... 100W Max.  (/QRP noted on entry)
Aug 21, 1800z to Aug 22, 0600z
Rules: http://www.ncjweb.com/naqprules.php
~~~
NJ QSO Party (CW/SSB)  
Aug 21, 2000z to Aug 22, 0700z
Aug 22, 1300z to Aug 23, 0200z
Rules: http://www.qsl.net/w2rj/
~~~
The Colorado QRP Club Summer VHF/UHF QSO Party *** QRP Contest ***
Aug 22, 1600z to 2200z (Sunday North America local time) 
Rules: http://www.cqc.org/contests/summer04.htm
~~~
Hawaii QSO Party (CW/SSB/Digital) ... QRP Category   
Aug 28, 0700z to Aug 29, 2200z
Rules: http://www.karc.us/hi_qso_party.html
~~~
TOEC WW Grid Contest (CW) ... Low Power category
Aug 28, 1200z to Aug 29, 1200z
Rules: http://www.qsl.net/toec/contest.htm
~~~
Ohio QSO Party (CW/SSB) ... QRP Category
Aug 28, 1600z to Aug 29, 0400z
Rules: http://www.oqp.us/
~~~
SLOVENIA CONTEST CLUB RTTY Championship .. 100W Category
Aug 28, 1200z to Aug 29, 1159z
Rules: http://lea.hamradio.si/~scc/rtty/htmlrules.htm
~~~
Thanks to SM3CER, WA7BNM, N0AX(ARRL), WB3AAL and others 
for assistance in compiling this calendar. 

Please foreward the contest info you sponsor to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
we will post it and give it more publicity.
Anyone may use this N2CQ QRP Contest Calendar for your website,
newsletter, e-mail list or other media as you choose.  
(Include a credit to the source of this material of course.)
72 de
Ken Newman - N2CQ 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.amqrp.org/contesting/contesting.html
http://www.n3epa.org/Pages/Contest/contest.htm

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Power out in Alignment, Part III

2004-07-28 Thread Joe Ford
Elecrafters

I'm at the alignment part III for my K2 #4155. The first step, on 40
mtrs setting Power control for 2 watts and adjusting L1 and L2 for
maximum power out in Tune mode gives me 3 watts. When I change Power
setting first to 5 watts then to 10 watts in Tune mode I get about 6+
and 12+ watts respectively. At 10 watt setting current in Tune is about
2.25.

Should I back off on L1 and L2 to give only 2 watts with Power set to 2
or should I leave it at max?

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Joe
K4NVJ
K1#764
K2#4155

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems

2004-07-28 Thread Parker Buckley
I've read several responses indicating that verticals are more noise-prone than 
dipoles, cf zepps, etc.I live on an average city lot with power lines at 
the back, and my experience has been a little different.  I've used a Butternut 
HF-2V with 16 radials for many years.  I've also experimented with a variety of 
wire antennas, including center fed zepps, dipoles, vertical dipoles fed with 
ladder line, verticals with elevated radials, verticals with loaded elevated 
radials (as in Moxon), and consistently the ground mounted vertical monopole is 
quieter (and provides at least the same signal strength).I've also tried a 
simple monopole for 30 meters (made from HF-2V parts) mounted on the same 
ground system, and found it to be quieter than any of the wire antennas on 30, 
either vertical or horizontal.  I believe the ground system is key to the whole 
thing.the ground mounted vertical is simply quieter than elevated ones.  If 
you can install a decent set of radials (quite easy to do: mow the grass, stake 
the wires out, and let Mother Nature hide them for you; at least it works in 
Ohio), I think a vertical is worth considering.  I've done extensive EZNEC 
modelling of all these antennas, and while interesting and fun, the noise issue 
is hard to predict and can be one of the more important considerations.

Parker WD8JOL K2 #2636
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2 #609 in Malta

2004-07-28 Thread JACrux
I just took #609 along with an old Bencher paddle and the Elecraft balun for a 
week of antenna rigging at 9H3BW's Bugibba apartment. I also took enough 
wire, ladderline and tools to make a G5RV style dipole on the apartment roof.
Nobody asked to look inside my hand baggage or inside the holdall full of 
wire. Getting a visitor license to operate as 9H3CW was even easier

I made  274 contacts in 59 countries in under a week of intermittent mostly 
rag chew operating, including a least one with another K2 owner.  The balun 
was just 3 feet from the K2; the G5RV is 8-10 feet above the roof and over 
100 feet above the sea .. It loads OK on all bands 10-80. No problems at all. 
We then tried the same setup with 9H3BW's FT847, LDG tuner and 100w. Again no 
problems.  At the 100w level the Elecraft balun worked as well as my homebrew 
2 kW balun and it is a lot lighter. 

Incidentally I have repackaged the Elecraft balun into a rigid plastic box 
featuring both SO239 and BNC input connectors. The balanced output goes from 
the PC board terminals to a hefty screw terminal block on the outside of the 
box. I think it makes a neater and less vulnerable installation for field 
use, especially if it rains ...  It did not rain in Malta, but it did hit 
40C. Rigging the antenna in that heat was a chore.

Next operation by 9H3CW is scheduled for late September. 

John G3JAG


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems

2004-07-28 Thread George, W5YR
Parker, what did you think of the EZNEC gain predictions for verticals?
Compared to wire dipoles at a modest height?

73, George W5YR
Fairview, TX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.w5yr.com


- Original Message - 
From: Parker Buckley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 6:10 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems


I've read several responses indicating that verticals are more noise-prone
than dipoles, cf zepps, etc.I live on an average city lot with power
lines at the back, and my experience has been a little different.  I've used
a Butternut HF-2V with 16 radials for many years.  I've also experimented
with a variety of wire antennas, including center fed zepps, dipoles,
vertical dipoles fed with ladder line, verticals with elevated radials,
verticals with loaded elevated radials (as in Moxon), and consistently the
ground mounted vertical monopole is quieter (and provides at least the same
signal strength).I've also tried a simple monopole for 30 meters (made
from HF-2V parts) mounted on the same ground system, and found it to be
quieter than any of the wire antennas on 30, either vertical or horizontal.
I believe the ground system is key to the whole thing.the ground mounted
vertical is simply quieter than elevated ones.  If you can install a decent
set of radials (quite easy to do: mow the grass, stake the wires out, and
let Mother Nature hide them for you; at least it works in Ohio), I think a
vertical is worth considering.  I've done extensive EZNEC modelling of all
these antennas, and while interesting and fun, the noise issue is hard to
predict and can be one of the more important considerations.

Parker WD8JOL K2 #2636
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] WA3WSJ: Sample QSL Cards of two lights - Take a Look!

2004-07-28 Thread Edward R. Breneiser
Hello all,

Take a look at the two qsl cards I've made to date. If you worked me on
my Delaware Lighthouse Tour, please send a SASE with #10 envelope for
these and the other qsl cards. 

Go to my website at www. WA3WSJ. com/files/WA3WSJevents.html to view the
lighthouse qsl cards I've made so far.

72/73,


Edward R. Breneiser, WA3WSJ
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] K2's ATU

2004-07-28 Thread Steve L.
I got my K2 for this year's FD, ended up using my
homebrew 3KW transmatch for the balanced-line
antennas.

Felt kinda dumb, this tiny radio on a battery and a
HUGE transmatch, external VSWR bridge, cables..

So, I rushed to build the ATU for the K2 just in time
for the Flight of the Bumblebees contest. Tacked a
small 1:1 current balun on the output, started hooking
it up to my home antennas for test.

Dang, this thing can really tune! I'm amazed, I gave
it antenna/band combinations I know are hard to tune
from doing it manually with my QRO gear, only had to
switch to 'alt' mode ONCE. It has tuned below 1.3:1
every single antenna/feedline/band combo I've thrown
at it, I'm impressed.

I also really like the SW options of just using it to
measure VSWR on an existing antenna and having two
antenna jacks is very nice to reduce external
switching.

Good job, it's a great compliment to the radio,
especially for field use.

73, Steve N4SL
(this seems to be where everyone lists their radio's
SN, so... K2 #4272



__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Several Elecraft radios for sale

2004-07-28 Thread Don Brown

 I have a K1 with all options including the 40, 30, 20, and 15 meter four band 
board (with blue trimmer caps) and also has a extra two band board set up for 
80 and 17 meters. It includes the noise blanker, internal automatic antenna 
tuner and internal battery option. It also includes the tilt stand Finger 
Dimple, precision metal shaft VFO pot and custom made TecPac case. I will also 
include 3 sets of NiMH batteries and a Maha 401 smart charger. This radio is 
only slightly used and in perfect condition S/N 542   Selling price $850 
shipped con US

 I have a new KX1 for sale with all options including the 30 meter option, 
internal antenna tuner and paddle. I will also include 2 sets of NiMH batteries 
and a Radio Shack 8 cell smart charger. The current price for all of the above 
including shipping is about $470 less the batteries and charger. My normal 
charge to build is $200 for a total of $670 shipped con US. This radio was 
built for sale and is new and unused.

I have a K2 with the KAF2 audio filter, K160RX 160 meter/receive antenna and 
KAT2 internal antenna tuner. I have purchased the KPA100 100 watt amp, the 
K60XV 60 meter/transverter interface, the KNB2 noise blanker and the KSB2 SSB 
option. I will build all of this and add to the basic K2 above over the next 2 
or 3 of weeks. The price of all of this from Elecraft is about $1490 my normal 
charge to build all of the above is $825 for a total of $2315. I will sell all 
of the above with all current mods, latest firmware and 2.5 Khz SSB bandwidth 
mod for $1999 shipped con US. I did not build this K2 although I will build all 
of the listed options. I have thoroughly checked out this radio and it is build 
to my standards. The radio is in perfect condition cosmetically and the same 90 
day warranty will apply as if I had built it. The serial number is 3132


  Warranty: I will repair any K2,  K1 or KX1 that's fails due to my workmanship 
within 90 days. Shipping is not included on warranty work. New radios have a 
one year parts warranty from Elecraft.

  I have built 14 K2's to date and 4 K1's. 5 KPA100's, 3 KAT100's and all of 
the options many times. I built Wayne and Eric's personal radios and have been 
a field tester for Elecraft several times. I was a field tester for the XV50, 
XV144 transverters and have built 7 of them including the XV222. I was also a 
field tester for the KRC2 band switching box and the KPA100. I have built two 
KX1's with all options so far. I have built one or more of everything Elecraft 
makes including all the micro kits.

  Please email me if you are interested 

  Thanks

  Don Brown
  KD5NDB
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems

2004-07-28 Thread G3VVT
One of the amateur radio elders in the UK, Dick G2DYM puts forward the  
theory that buildings and presumably power lines are surrounded by an envelope  
of 
electronic smog. To clear this noise you have to have your antenna  mounted 
above this noise source or presumably if on the ground well clear of  these 
items. Additionally he is a firm advocate of using balanced feeders  to 
minimise 
noise pick on the feeder to the antenna.
 
Have always lived in locations with substantial amounts of rock under the  
top soil, so never could get verticals to work on the ground no matter what I  
did. They were just about as good as a vertical piece of wet string! The only  
way was to get them mounted as high as possible with four full sized radials  
underneath the base of the antenna for each band they were resonant on. With  
that you could work the world at the right time.
 
Bob, G3VVT
K2 #4168
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


RE: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems

2004-07-28 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
The rule of thumb is that verticals are noisier because QRN (lightning
crashes, etc.) are generally vertically-polarized. In my experience this is
true on the lower frequency bands (e.g. 160 and 80 meters). 

But there are a lot of other types of noise and noise sources. QRN that is
propagated and radiated from power lines - which tend to be horizontal - may
couple much better into a horizontal wire than a vertical, for example. 

Like all rules of thumb, whether or not it is true depends a great deal on
the thumb, as Jim points out.

Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:10:27 -0400, Parker Buckley wrote:

I believe the ground system is key to the whole thing.the ground 
mounted
vertical is simply quieter than elevated ones. 

You may be right, but I suspect that the location of the antenna with
respect to the 
noise is more likely the key. 

Jim K9YC


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems

2004-07-28 Thread Earl W Cunningham
George,  W5YR writes:

Parker, what did you think of the EZNEC gain predictions for verticals? 
Compared to wire dipoles at a modest height?
==
The free space gain of a vertical is about the same as that of a dipole
(2.14 dBi).  However, over real ground the horizontal antenna benefits by
far field ground reflection.  This is borne out in EZNEC.

Remember that a vertical's gain is concentrated at the low angles that
are good for DXing, while the horizontal antenna must be relatively high
(at least 0.5 wavelengths) to have a reasonably low angle of radiation..

As far as noise goes, the dipole has a better receive S/N ratio than a
vertical simply because it has directivity, while the vertical is
omnidirectional.  Also, because of its low angle radiation, the vertical
hears man made noises better (which are generated close to the ground
and therefore arrive at a low angle).

73, de Earl, K6SE
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems

2004-07-28 Thread Parker Buckley
Earl,

I agree that's what the model shows and what the theory says.  You're
probably assuming the dipole is at least a half wave above ground, which can
be a challenge at lower frequencies.  I'm just relating my real world
experiences, and suggesting that the vertical not be dismissed too soon in
the considerations.

Would love to continue, but I'm heading out on a trip.  Looking forward to
checking back in when I return!

73,
Parker WD8JOL

- Original Message -
From: Earl W Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems


 George,  W5YR writes:

 Parker, what did you think of the EZNEC gain predictions for verticals?
 Compared to wire dipoles at a modest height?
 ==
 The free space gain of a vertical is about the same as that of a dipole
 (2.14 dBi).  However, over real ground the horizontal antenna benefits by
 far field ground reflection.  This is borne out in EZNEC.

 Remember that a vertical's gain is concentrated at the low angles that
 are good for DXing, while the horizontal antenna must be relatively high
 (at least 0.5 wavelengths) to have a reasonably low angle of radiation..

 As far as noise goes, the dipole has a better receive S/N ratio than a
 vertical simply because it has directivity, while the vertical is
 omnidirectional.  Also, because of its low angle radiation, the vertical
 hears man made noises better (which are generated close to the ground
 and therefore arrive at a low angle).

 73, de Earl, K6SE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Ser no. 3181

2004-07-28 Thread Dale Boresz

Hello Ron,

Your AGC threshold has a huge effect on  the range of adjustment of the 
RF gain control. If the AGC threshold is set too high - meaning that you 
are generally operating with very little AGC action - your RF gain 
control will have very little effect. If you lower your threshold, 
you'll find that the RF gain control will have a much greater effect.


Just a reminder, R1 on the control board is what controls this 
threshold, and in the K2 manual, the information relating to this 
adjustment is located right next to the info about the S-meter 
alignment. (page 46 in my Rev D manual for S/N 3039, so it's probably 
the same version as yours).


Hope this helps.

73, Dale / WA8SRA

Ron Lorenz wrote:


Love this little rig. One slight (mini) probem. Based on over 50 years of
radio operating, amateur, commercial and military I always leave the RF gain
on max for best SNR.

With my K2, turning the control to any position, (max to min and back agin)
makes no difference in gain (Noise) except to shift the position of the S
meter reading, ie, iaw the HI and LO Cal procedure.

Any ideas?

73

Ron VA6RL

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


 



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Elecraft K1 mods

2004-07-28 Thread Ken N4SO
Elecraft K1 Mods that I am aware of:
(refers to the 2-band  K1 several years ago)

VFO linearization--  
Attenuator on/off pop 
QSK thunk from Andy Wallace and Elecraft Appl. Note.
Sidetone mod from AG5Q and Elecraft  
K1 illumination to LCD


These mods were saved text files from Wayne Burdick,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Morrow, Andy Wallace and others.
The text files are grouped into one text file on this computer.

There are other specific mods to the K1 on the Elecraft Web
site (depending on the bands you operate and your own desires).


Ken Brown  N4SO
Mobile,  AL  EM50tk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
K2  #3394



The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Mounting vertical antennas

2004-07-28 Thread Per von Zweigbergk
I live in an apartment building in a large city, and I have decided 
that basically the only realistic option (besides operating with 
stealthy wire antennas) is to mount some form of vertical HF antenna -- 
and I need to pitch the idea to my landlord, who will obviously have a 
few concerns. I'm probably happy enough to accept that if I do things 
as they are normally done, bad stuff won't happen -- but it'd be nice 
to have some nice pictures, stories and hard specifications rather than 
vague ideas to put forward.


It would be really helpful if I could get descriptions of how *you* 
have mounted your HF vertical antenna to your roof, and how reliable it 
has been with respect to winds et cetera. Even more helpful would be 
pictures of the installation in place!


I'm currently leaning towards having some kind of chimney mount, since 
I won't be allowed to make any holes in the roof itself, but I'm open 
to other suggestions of course! :-) But I still have some unresolved 
questions.


How can ensure reasonable reliability. Obviously, the last thing I want 
is for the antenna to come loose and come crashing down on some poor 
soul or his car. What calculations should I do in order to ensure that 
the antenna stays up? And how can I accomplish that if it fails, at 
least it should fail in a relativelty safe way. (I.e. not come crashing 
down tens of meters. :-)


Also, most guides I've read tell you to mount the antenna to a mast 
tube, using U-bolts to secure the antenna itself to the mast. (It seems 
that my vertical has holes supplied for just that purpose.) Won't that 
decrease reliability -- should I try to mount the antenna directly to 
the chimney, or is the mast tubing there for a good reason?


Finally, should I just forget about trying to do this myself, and have 
it professionally installed? After all, the stakes with respect to 
reliablilty and safety for working at relatively high altitudes are a 
bit higher than erecting a horizontal dipole in a couple of trees 
(which I have done at my summer QTH I might add. :-) What kind of 
people can I expect to have to contact about this, and if I decide to 
go professional, how much would it cost reasonably?


--
73 de SM0YUF
Rig: Elecraft K2 -- Serial number 4291 (base model -- almost, but not 
quite finished.)


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] FingerDimple Kit Assembly

2004-07-28 Thread Art-W6KY
Received my 'FingerDimple' kits today for both of my K1's and after
reviewing the 3 instruction steps, clearing a workplace, breaking out
the alcohol (as described in step 1) I began the installation. This has
got to be the most straightforward kit I have ever assembled. No toroids,
no solder suckers, no resistance measurments. Before I knew it I was 
done and toasting my work with alcohol (as described in step 1).
On the air: WOW! I can now spin my knob and make it from one end
of 40 meters to the other in about 2 seconds.
Which will be great while contesting in the NAQP (North American CW
QSO Party) on Aug 7th. I have worked all 50 states many times during the
10 allowed hours plus all VE Provences, QRO, but never QRP. 
Should be a ball as the Big Guys will be begging for QSO's
73 es CU There, Art  W6KYK1-2  K1-4

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] cheap 1A linear power supply

2004-07-28 Thread Eric Ward
Has anyone tried the 12V 1A linear regulated wall wart from Jameco (part #
170245CL) as a hotel room power supply for the KX1?  It is cheap and sounds
like it would work-i.e. not a switcher and regulated.

TNX and

73,

Eric

N0HHS 

 

 

 

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] KX1 in the Bahamas

2004-07-28 Thread Gil Stacy

Folks,
I'll be in Hope Town, Abaco, Bahamas from July 30 through Aug 6.  BOLO for 
NN4CW/C6A.
It's a fishing, lobstering, etc. family trip and I'll try to get on the air 
when I can in the evenings and early morning around the qrp watering holes 
on 20, 30, and 40.


73/Gil
NN4CW
K2 #3104
KX1 #53

_
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® 
Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963


___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Receive Problems

2004-07-28 Thread Gregg Lengling
I've got a Rev A K2 (#529) that a friend brought to me to upgrade to all the
Rev B mods ect.  Before I did the mods I fixed some problemslow audio
out (bad solder joint) and other minor probs.  So before I started the
upgrades it was working.

Here's the problem now.  The radio works great except for the following on
receive:
Very low recovered audio and low S meter reading
I'm looking in the preamp/mixer and receive VFO areaI found on
the VFO (Q18) the original owner put another 1N4148 on the bottom of the
board across D13 in the opposite polaritywas this something I didn't
hear about (with or without I still have the problem).  I've checked the
voltages on the VFO and Buffer and the preamp and everything looks good.  So
does anyone have some ideas.

Thanks in advance.


Gregg R. Lengling, W9DHI, Retired
Administrator http://www.milwaukeehdtv.org
K2/100 S#3075 KX1 S# 57
Member:  ARRL, RSGB, RCA, WERA and ORC
 




___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems

2004-07-28 Thread George, W5YR
I regret that in my Socratic approach. I failed to make the point I was
trying to make. Specifically that while vertical antennas may have a low
takeoff angle their gain is usually less than that of an isotropic antenna.

For example, look at vert1.ez in EZNEC and you find that its gain is -0.04
dB max at an elevation angle of about 25 degrees. Similarly, if you look at
bydipole.ez on 40 meters you find that although the elevation angle for a
dipole height of 30 ft is near 90 degrees, the gain is over 7 dBi. Raise the
dipole to 67 ft as Earl points out and the gain increases slightly but the
takeoff angle declines to about 30 degrees and the azimuth pattern begins to
form.

So, Earl's points are well made: high dipoles if low-angle radiation is
desired with gain over isotropic or vertical antennas performing essentially
as isotropics but with a low takeoff angle. To me, the trade-off is that if
you take the wire invested in the vertical and the radial field and can
manage to get it up in the air high enough, you obtain significant gain over
isotropic, a low takeoff angle and some degree of azimuthal pattern - which
may or may not be advantageous depending upon the orientation of the antenna
supports.

73, George W5YR
Fairview, TX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.w5yr.com




- Original Message - 
From: Earl W Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Re: More antenna problems


 George,  W5YR writes:

 Parker, what did you think of the EZNEC gain predictions for verticals?
 Compared to wire dipoles at a modest height?
 ==
 The free space gain of a vertical is about the same as that of a dipole
 (2.14 dBi).  However, over real ground the horizontal antenna benefits by
 far field ground reflection.  This is borne out in EZNEC.

 Remember that a vertical's gain is concentrated at the low angles that
 are good for DXing, while the horizontal antenna must be relatively high
 (at least 0.5 wavelengths) to have a reasonably low angle of radiation..

 As far as noise goes, the dipole has a better receive S/N ratio than a
 vertical simply because it has directivity, while the vertical is
 omnidirectional.  Also, because of its low angle radiation, the vertical
 hears man made noises better (which are generated close to the ground
 and therefore arrive at a low angle).

 73, de Earl, K6SE

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Receive Problems

2004-07-28 Thread Ken Wagner

Gregg Lengling wrote:


I've got a Rev A K2 (#529) that a friend brought to me to upgrade to all the
Rev B mods ect.  Before I did the mods I fixed some problemslow audio
out (bad solder joint) and other minor probs.  So before I started the
upgrades it was working.

Here's the problem now.  The radio works great except for the following on 
receive:
Very low recovered audio and low S meter reading
I'm looking in the preamp/mixer and receive VFO areaI found on
the VFO (Q18) the original owner put another 1N4148 on the bottom of the
board across D13 in the opposite polaritywas this something I didn't
hear about (with or without I still have the problem).  I've checked the
voltages on the VFO and Buffer and the preamp and everything looks good.  So
does anyone have some ideas.
 


~~
Hi Gregg:
I'd take a close look around the post-mixer amp (Q22) looking at 
R82, RFC11, in particular.

73  GL
Ken Wagner K3IU

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Ser no. 3181

2004-07-28 Thread Don Wilhelm
Ron,

The 'RF Gain' in the K2 is actually an IF gain control and it only controls
the gain after the selective elements.  All the stages ahead of the IF
amplifier operate at fixed gain levels.

In many receivers where the RF stage is gain controlled, my experience is
that the gain can be made excessive and actually results in added noise when
it is advanced to maximum - this is contrary to your experience, but it goes
to show that the noise floor of any receiver is the result of careful design
for minimum noise.  The K2 is in the category of such careful design.

The K2 AGC works similarly - only the IF amplifier gain is changed with the
AGC.  The 'RF' Gain control changes the resistive network that sets the AGC
level - so the net result is that the RF Gain and the AGC interact to set
the IF amplifier gain.  You may wish to check the AGC threshold just to be
certain (although it does sound like it is set just fine).  Switching from
AGC on to AGC off should cause no increase in the noise level when listening
to a quiet band (local noise sources CAN produce broadband noise, so use a
band where such noise is at a minimum for your location).  If the AGC
Threshold is set in this manner, one can expect little or no change in the
K2 noise floor when the RF Gain control is rotated.

73,
Don W3FPR

- Original Message - 

 Love this little rig. One slight (mini) probem. Based on over 50 years of
 radio operating, amateur, commercial and military I always leave the RF
gain
 on max for best SNR.

 With my K2, turning the control to any position, (max to min and back
agin)
 makes no difference in gain (Noise) except to shift the position of the S
 meter reading, ie, iaw the HI and LO Cal procedure.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] Re: Mounting vertical antennas

2004-07-28 Thread Ingo Meyer DK3RED

Hello Per,

I live in an apartment building in a large city, and I have decided that 
basically the only realistic option (besides operating with stealthy 
wire antennas) is to mount some form of vertical HF antenna ...


I had the same situation in my apartment. So I solved the problem with a 
telescopic mast, which I can errect in a few minutes. The mast is attach with 
small part from the building store on the railing of my balcony. No need to 
drill a hole in any parts of the balcony and secure to attach. For more 
informations please go to www.dk3red.homepage.t-online.de/en/s6.htm#ant1 on my 
homepage.

--
72/73 de Ingo, DK3RED   Don't forget: the fun is the power!

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.dk3red.homepage.t-online.de
 DL-QRP-AG   #824   http://www.dl-qrp-ag.de
  QRP ARCI #11295   http://www.qrparci.org

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] cheap 1A linear power supply

2004-07-28 Thread Steve Lawrence

Here's one that's perfect.

http://www.mtechnologies.com/cup/index.htm

73, Steve WB6RSE

On Jul 28, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Eric Ward wrote:

Has anyone tried the 12V 1A linear regulated wall wart from Jameco 
(part #
170245CL) as a hotel room power supply for the KX1?  It is cheap and 
sounds

like it would work-i.e. not a switcher and regulated.

TNX and

73,

Eric

N0HHS







___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft

Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Receive Problems

2004-07-28 Thread Don Wilhelm
Gregg,

I would suggest looking carefully in the IF filter area.  You found one bad
solder joint, so another one is quite likely.  The last one I worked on with
similar problems had a bad solder joint on the SSB board at one of the 3 pin
headers - which reduced the signal getting to the IF amplifier a LOT.
Remove the SSB board and put jumpers into the 3 pin headers (jumper from
pins 1 to 3) and see if it comes to life again - if so, the problem is on
the SSB board.

73,
Don W3FPR

- Original Message - 

I've got a Rev A K2 (#529) that a friend brought to me to upgrade to all the
Rev B mods ect.  Before I did the mods I fixed some problemslow audio
out (bad solder joint) and other minor probs.  So before I started the
upgrades it was working.

Here's the problem now.  The radio works great except for the following on
receive:
Very low recovered audio and low S meter reading
I'm looking in the preamp/mixer and receive VFO areaI found on
the VFO (Q18) the original owner put another 1N4148 on the bottom of the
board across D13 in the opposite polaritywas this something I didn't
hear about (with or without I still have the problem).  I've checked the
voltages on the VFO and Buffer and the preamp and everything looks good.  So
does anyone have some ideas.



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] KX1 in the Bahamas

2004-07-28 Thread MC Carpenter
'll be listening on 20 I'm in St. Thomas, Virgins from  aug 4 to aug  7th,
on 32  foot yacht , The Morning After, KB7DPC
- Original Message - 
From: Gil Stacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:48 PM
Subject: [Elecraft] KX1 in the Bahamas


 Folks,
 I'll be in Hope Town, Abaco, Bahamas from July 30 through Aug 6.  BOLO for
 NN4CW/C6A.
 It's a fishing, lobstering, etc. family trip and I'll try to get on the
air
 when I can in the evenings and early morning around the qrp watering holes
 on 20, 30, and 40.

 73/Gil
 NN4CW
 K2 #3104
 KX1 #53

 _
 Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®
 Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963

 ___
 Elecraft mailing list
 Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
 Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.):
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
 Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com



___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


[Elecraft] need help listening for KI6WX (now)

2004-07-28 Thread wayne burdick
Tom, N0SS, and I are trying to copy KI6WX on 10108 kHz now (0200Z), 
then 14062 at 0215Z, then 7040 at 0230Z.


Any help?

tnx
Wayne
N6KR

---

http://www.elecraft.com

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] need help listening for KI6WX (now)

2004-07-28 Thread Vic Rosenthal

wayne burdick wrote:
Tom, N0SS, and I are trying to copy KI6WX on 10108 kHz now (0200Z), then 
14062 at 0215Z, then 7040 at 0230Z.


I arrived in time for the 0230 sked and heard Tom, but I did not hear John.

--
73,
Vic, K2VCO
Fresno CA
http://www.qsl.net/k2vco

___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com


Re: [Elecraft] Mounting vertical antennas

2004-07-28 Thread G3VVT
I would approach it in the same way as mounting a large TV antenna on a  
chimney stack, though the method used may vary from country to country how to  
achieve this.
 
In the UK, traditionally we use a galvanised stranded steel band (lashing  
wire) that passes around the chimney stack which is attached to an antenna  
mounting bracket with J bolts to terminate the band and adjust for  tension. 
Galvanised steel or aluminium corner plates are placed under the wire  band at 
the other three corners of the chimney stack to spread the load on the  corner. 
A mast of the necessary length and diameter to mount the antenna is  attached 
to the mounted chimney bracket with two U bolts. With a vertical HF  antenna 
a heavy duty chimney bracket is called for, or two separate brackets  with 
separate chimney bands as we used in the early days of TV with large TV  
antenna 
installations. The galvanised fitting are fairly robust though they  can be 
replaced with stainless steel stranded wire and J bolts if local  corrosion 
was to be a problem. I use galvanised fittings and paint all potential  areas 
of corrosion with an automobile body underseal/internal panel rust  inhibitor. 
In the UK this is product marketed by Finnegan (Hunting Lubricants)  called 
WAXOYL. This product excludes moisture and dries with a surface skin  which 
also 
discourages the gathering of moisture. Our Volvo station wagon  manufactured 
in Sweden uses a similar brown coloured product inside it's  automobile door 
panels. Antenna fittings painted in this way are still  removable 20 years 
later whilst a normal fitting would be rusted solid after  only a few years in 
some locations. The moral is if it could rust paint it  which I also do with 
any 
fittings on the antenna itself that could  rust living in a rather wet part of 
the UK.
 
In the late 1960's I had an antenna similar to the HyGain 12AVQ  mounted with 
two U bolts on a 1 1/2 (38mm) stub mast in this way with radials  attached 
to the ground connection on the base of the antenna. If a longer mast  is 
used the radials could be arranged as guy wires for added strength of the  
installation. The methods used depend on the exposure to wind and the elements  
at 
the chosen location. The same method I now use with a moderate  sized VHF/UHF 
collinear antenna that occupies the prime position on one of  my chimney 
stacks. If an external TV antenna were to used and space was  restricted it 
would be 
possible to mount a TV antenna under the HF antenna on  the mounting mast. In 
my case I do not have this problem living in an old  house with three 
chimneys stacks to cope with the old situation pre central  heating of a fire 
place 
in every room.
 
Served my early work experience in the late 1950's in the Radio  and TV trade 
standing on roofs/chimney stacks to install TV antennas.
 
Bob, G3VVT
K2 #4168
___
Elecraft mailing list
Post to: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
You must be a subscriber to post to the list.
Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): 
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com