How about the KX3? I tried to dial it up there and it bounced to 44.000.
Tim
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:14 PM Wayne Burdick wrote:
> The K3, being a superhet that involves mixers, uses very narrow-band
> transmit band-pass filtering that doesn't allow operation midway between 10
> and 6
The K3, being a superhet that involves mixers, uses very narrow-band transmit
band-pass filtering that doesn't allow operation midway between 10 and 6
meters. So it is excluded in firmware.
That said, the K3 provides very versatile support for external transverters.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
> On Jan
What about the K3 for RX on 8m? Mine bounces me to 44.000 MHz if I try to
enter 40.662 MHz via CAT or front panel.
73 de AI6KG
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 3:39 PM Wayne Burdick wrote:
> The K4 should work at 40-41 MHz without modification, though I wouldn't
> guarantee specs without
The K4 should work at 40-41 MHz without modification, though I wouldn't
guarantee specs without performance testing.
73,
Wayne
N6KR
> On Jun 27, 2019, at 2:52 PM, Ed K1EP wrote:
>
> Maybe for RX. For TX, you have to consider spurs, harmonics, filters and
> other technicalities. So, it is
Maybe for RX. For TX, you have to consider spurs, harmonics, filters and
other technicalities. So, it is not trivial.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019, 17:36 Dennis Moore wrote:
> SDR, should just be a modification to the firmware.
>
> Dennis NJ6G
>
> On 6/27/2019 13:44, David Gilbert wrote:
> > A friend
SDR, should just be a modification to the firmware.
Dennis NJ6G
On 6/27/2019 13:44, David Gilbert wrote:
A friend just advised me of a new FCC Petition for Rule Making that
requests the creation of a new amateur band for 8m somewhere between
40 and 41 MHz.
A friend just advised me of a new FCC Petition for Rule Making that
requests the creation of a new amateur band for 8m somewhere between 40
and 41 MHz.
https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/105260090923685/8%20meter%20PRM.pdf
I doubt it gets any traction, but it makes me curious if any mods
(software
7 matches
Mail list logo
