Dear Mike,
actually, you wrote in your 13 May 2000 mail
(http://www.egroups.com/message/election-methods-list/5388):
Steve didn't say that Beatpath Winner chose a Pareto inferior
candidate or violated Pareto. He merely said that it chose
a candidate whom no voter preferred to the Tideman
Dear Mike,
you wrote (19 June 2000):
Markus said here that on May 13, on this list, I said that my
"Tideman bad-example" was possible, as written. That seemed
quite unlikely at the time, because it was long before May 13
that someone pointed out to me that Bruce Anderson hadn't
said that
actually, you wrote in your 13 May 2000 mail
(http://www.egroups.com/message/election-methods-list/5388):
Steve didn't say that Beatpath Winner chose a Pareto inferior
candidate or violated Pareto. He merely said that it chose
a candidate whom no voter preferred to the Tideman winner,
