Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
This is a problem with Org -- I have a patch for this on my local
branch, but I will push this branch only tomorrow.
Applied now, thanks.
--
Bastien
Am 25.03.2013 06:45, schrieb Bastien:
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
This is a problem with Org -- I have a patch for this on my local
branch, but I will push this branch only tomorrow.
Applied now, thanks.
I'd like to ask you to revisit that change. I don't think the question
of
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Am 25.03.2013 06:45, schrieb Bastien:
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
This is a problem with Org -- I have a patch for this on my local
branch, but I will push this branch only tomorrow.
Applied now, thanks.
I'd like to ask you to revisit that
Am 25.03.2013 15:57, schrieb Bastien:
I'm not entirely sure what Gnus does to trigger that foray into Org
(a quick glance in the documentation didn't show anything), but if
anything this indicates that we might need a safe mode for Org to
open untrusted files.
Feel free to propose a better
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
As I said, I don't even know why Gnus decides it should treat this mail as
an Org file. From the sources of Gnus, it appears that it should only do
this if the MIME type was text/x-org. Rainers mail didn't have this MIME
type nor was it a multipart MIME
Am 25.03.2013 16:54, schrieb Bastien:
What about this patch?
I don't think Gnus should be switching major modes just to get
fontification and definitely not with Org.
The change in Gnus is then trivial (see other patch).
Again, I'd rather have a derived mode (org-safe-mode, perhaps) that
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
Am 25.03.2013 16:54, schrieb Bastien:
What about this patch?
I don't think Gnus should be switching major modes just to get
fontification and definitely not with Org.
But it does.
The change in Gnus is then trivial (see other patch).
Again, I'd
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Evaluating it against your ideal fix will obvisouly make it look
rudimentary. But I think it's better than the current situation.
PS: that's not to say that the door is closed for your ideal fix,
of course. But I favor existing patches vs. ideal solutions.
--
Am 25.03.2013 17:57, schrieb Bastien:
Can you evaluate my patch against the current state of affair?
The current state of affairs is this:
1. Gnus is doing something it shouldn't do, even though it may once have
been OK or at least not dangerous.
2. Org doesn't have something that can
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
talking different implementations of the second point above. But given
that Gnus expects to use a major mode with no setup, why not give them
this:
(define-derived-mode org-safe-mode org-mode Org-Safe
;; docstring etc.
)
My feeling is that having a
Am 22.03.2013 01:20, schrieb John Hendy:
Can you try using just file and file.html (but without quotes) and
see I'd it pops out in your working directory ?
Your current path looks like a Windows server share which might be an
issue. Even if not, simplifying the path might be one place to
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Rainer Stengele
rainer.steng...@online.de wrote:
Am 22.03.2013 01:20, schrieb John Hendy:
Can you try using just file and file.html (but without quotes) and
see I'd it pops out in your working directory ?
Your current path looks like a Windows server share
Hello,
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
Another funny issue here is that for the test my exported subtree has
the tag :noexport:
My setting is:
org-export-exclude-tags is a variable defined in `ox.el'.
Its value is (noexport)
So the export shouldn't export that subtree
Am 22.03.2013 15:58, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Hello,
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
Another funny issue here is that for the test my exported subtree has
the tag :noexport:
My setting is:
org-export-exclude-tags is a variable defined in `ox.el'.
Its value is
Am 22.03.2013 15:51, schrieb John Hendy:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Rainer Stengele
rainer.steng...@online.de wrote:
Am 22.03.2013 01:20, schrieb John Hendy:
Can you try using just file and file.html (but without quotes) and
see I'd it pops out in your working directory ?
Your current
Hello,
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
Secondly, the :EXPORT_FILE_NAME: property is only followed when doing
subtree export. It is ignored for buffer export no matter where I put
the property definition.
Please help.
There is no buffer keyword equivalent to
Hi,
Exporting to HTML I cannot get EXPORT_FILE_NAME to work:
:PROPERTIES:
:VISIBILITY: folded
#+SETUPFILE: ~/org/GLOBAL_SETUP_DIPLAN.org
#+CATEGORY: ROB
:EXPORT_FILE_NAME:
//max2008/diplan/0PROJEKT/Kunden/ROB/Status-ROB-Electronic-20130321b.html
:END:
:EXPORT_FILE_NAME: entry is in one line.
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
Hi,
Exporting to HTML I cannot get EXPORT_FILE_NAME to work:
:PROPERTIES:
:VISIBILITY: folded
#+SETUPFILE: ~/org/GLOBAL_SETUP_DIPLAN.org
#+CATEGORY: ROB
:EXPORT_FILE_NAME:
Eric Abrahamsen e...@ericabrahamsen.net writes:
Rainer Stengele rainer.steng...@online.de writes:
Hi,
Exporting to HTML I cannot get EXPORT_FILE_NAME to work:
:PROPERTIES:
:VISIBILITY: folded
#+SETUPFILE: ~/org/GLOBAL_SETUP_DIPLAN.org
#+CATEGORY: ROB
:EXPORT_FILE_NAME:
Hi Andreas and Eric,
Andreas Leha andreas.l...@med.uni-goettingen.de writes:
It was the same for me and this should definitely not happen. So, I am
also 'a little worried'. Is this a problem with my gnus setup or an
orgmode problem?
This is a problem with Org -- I have a patch for this on
Can you try using just file and file.html (but without quotes) and see
I'd it pops out in your working directory ?
Your current path looks like a Windows server share which might be an
issue. Even if not, simplifying the path might be one place to start .
I just successfully exported using the
21 matches
Mail list logo
