On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 01:23, andy pugh wrote:
> > I just built the 2.8 branch on my computer here (Buster, rtpreempt,
> > amd64, 8 CPUs, 32 GB RAM), and am running the test suite in a loop.
> > I'll report back if anything fails...
Just checking through, that combination has been green then
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 01:17, Sebastian Kuzminsky
wrote:
> I just built the 2.8 branch on my computer here (Buster, rtpreempt,
> amd64, 8 CPUs, 32 GB RAM), and am running the test suite in a loop.
> I'll report back if anything fails...
I fired off another build, and got a different set of
On 8/30/20 4:07 PM, andy pugh wrote:
I had what I thought was a stable and "good enough" status to push 2.8.
But somehow pushing only a changelog change has led to a set of
runtests failures.
How is that possible?
This situation does happen from time to time. It's most likely due to
flaky
I had what I thought was a stable and "good enough" status to push 2.8.
But somehow pushing only a changelog change has led to a set of
runtests failures.
How is that possible?
This means that the buildbot won't build the release debs. So I don't
know what to do now.
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 10:31, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote:
> When I tried
> to install it (graphical install) the installer couldn't detect and mount
> the image.
Testing on a VM I briefly see a comment about not being able to mount
sda, but then that disappears and installation proceeds.
mount:
