Please correct me if I am wrong.
The current buildbot hosted and mentioned by Seb:
The buildbot currently consists of ~20 VMs, each with 2 CPUs, 4 GB RAM,
and ~20 GB disk. The buildmaster has 200 GB disk, mostly to host the
package archive some of those VMs can be retired when we EOL 2.8
linuxcnc 2.9.0~pre0+git20221105.ffb6bda926-1.2 is marked for autoremoval from
testing on 2022-12-20
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
1023548: pyopengl: migrate to libglut3.12
https://bugs.debian.org/1023548
This mail is generated by:
Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 19:14, Sebastian Kuzminsky a écrit :
>
> Hosting the hardware is relatively little effort.
But it has cost, real estate, and environmental impact potentially
freely offloadable to dedicated, optimized, on-demand alternative.
> Most of the effort is in the initial creation
Seb,
I've been working with buildbot 3.6.1 and have it building a deb for me.
Next task for me is to figure out how to setup a remote builder.
On 11/15/2022 12:02 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 11/14/22 18:43, m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
On 2022-11-14 15:54, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 11/14/22 18:43, m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
On 2022-11-14 15:54, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
In order to support testing LinuxCNC on RTAI the buildbot uses custom
VMs which i created a long time ago and maintain poorly. It all runs
on hardware in my house, on my local network, so I am
On 11/14/22 16:58, Rod Webster wrote:
Perhaps the Github actions could be extended to build the 2.9 branch?
Our current Github Actions already builds & tests all branches (but does
not publish any packages).
--
Sebastian Kuzminsky
___
Andy has tried to help but I still don't have sftp to
http://linuxcnc.org/dists/ , can anyone help?
JT
On 11/14/2022 8:49 AM, John Thornton wrote:
If someone can supply me with the credentials for
http://linuxcnc.org/dists/ I can build debs and upload them via sftp
for the ones that the
>It may well be able to build the live ISO too, but I'm still not sure
about that...
I can't see why not, the code is there to make debs (and your docs!) so we
can surely just script that into the workflow.
Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
Jérémie
Thats great! I also found this shortcut!
https://linuxkamarada.com/en/2019/03/19/integrating-the-open-build-service-with-github/#.Y3N6yj1By3A
The repo for osc is in Debian too, Unfortunately it uses some python that
was deprecated in V 3.9 so you'd have to run it on Buster I think. I tried
Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 01:03, Rod Webster a écrit :
>
> I'll just wait until you guys decide on a way forward and iff the offer we
> have is required.
> Perhaps the Github actions could be extended to build the 2.9 branch?
I don't see what would prevent us to build whatever branches we'd want to
Le lun. 14 nov. 2022 à 22:10, John Thornton a écrit :
>
> This sounds like a good long term solution if it's free.
>
I'm only looking at free (beer) options, at least as long as LinuxCNC
doesn't have a registered organization to receive money and subscribe
to services in its own name.
Le lun. 14 nov. 2022 à 21:49, andy pugh a écrit :
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 20:42, Jérémie Tarot wrote:
>
> > Could someone explain me how relocating the buildbot on someone's
> > machine can be better for the project than migrating it to GitHub
> > Actions, build farm and package hoster ?
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
