How about a summary write up?
We are making a two tier project if we continue like this.
From: Jérémie Tarot
Sent: November 18, 2022 8:13 AM
To: EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Next LinuxCNC video chat
Le ven. 18 nov. 2022 à 03:51, Chris Morley a
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 21:10, Alec Ari via Emc-developers
wrote:
>
> Ok, with that being said, we should stop saying RTAI cannot/will not be
> tested. I keep reading that among/amongst the mailing list.
No, I for one remain keen on retaining RTAI support (and Xenomai too)
--
atp
"A motorcycle
Ya it's always been hard to consistently get answers in our project.
It just seems the nature of our group.
Thanks for continuing to try.
Currently strategy is to merge up, though you can cherry-pick up too, as a
merge later should understand this.
But we rarely do anything with an
Ok, with that being said, we should stop saying RTAI cannot/will not be tested.
I keep reading that among/amongst the mailing list.
Alec
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 02:44:43 PM CST, Sebastian Kuzminsky
wrote:
On 11/23/22 12:19, Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote:
> OK, so that
On 11/23/22 12:19, Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote:
OK, so that should work with the Github CI/CD too then, right?
Yes. Here's a recent run of our CI in Github Actions:
https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/actions/runs/3500716822
This is the script that controls it:
OK, so that should work with the Github CI/CD too then, right?
Alec
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 10:45:58 AM CST, Sebastian Kuzminsky
wrote:
On 11/23/22 09:02, Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote:
> With CI/CD, can't you have it do a `runtests` in a run-in-place
> environment? I
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 21:38, Chris Morley wrote:
>
> I wonder if we might discuss a different merging strategy for 2 9/master.
> This would be relative to work being done in 2.9 for release.
>
> I suggest we don't merge up any more.
> Cherry pick or a separate commit makes more sense to me.
>
On 11/23/22 09:02, Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote:
With CI/CD, can't you have it do a `runtests` in a run-in-place
environment? I could also write a simple RTAI test program (even more
simple than the testsuite/built-in latency test) that'll just load
and exit.
Yes, the full test suite can
With CI/CD, can't you have it do a `runtests` in a run-in-place environment? I
could also write a simple RTAI test program (even more simple than the
testsuite/built-in latency test) that'll just load and exit.
Alec
On Wednesday, November 23, 2022 at 04:38:42 AM CST, Jérémie Tarot
Hello friends :)
Found it back !
https://github.com/rpatterson/github-apt-repos
So, if I understood correctly, except for *testing* RTAI builds which
need loading/unloading kernel modules, we could have a full GH
workflow up to repository hosting :)
This may not have all the bells and whistles of
10 matches
Mail list logo
