Ya it's always been hard to consistently get answers in our project.
It just seems the nature of our group.
Thanks for continuing to try.

Currently strategy is to merge up, though you can cherry-pick up too, as a 
merge later should understand this.
But we rarely do anything with an older-then-current-release (I realize that 
2.8 is still sorta current)

On the absence of an agreement, I am merging up 2.9 to master to keep in sync.

Chris
________________________________
From: andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com>
Sent: November 23, 2022 4:59 PM
To: EMC developers <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: [Emc-developers] Merge Strategy

On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 21:38, Chris Morley <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder if we might discuss a different merging strategy for 2 9/master.
> This would be relative to work being done in 2.9 for release.
>
> I suggest we don't merge up any more.
> Cherry pick or a separate commit makes more sense to me.
>

Well, the discussion seems to have resulted in nothing happening, and
some things in 2,8 that probably do belong in 2.9 and master.

So what _is_ the current policy?


--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
lunatics."
— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1912


_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to