On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 18:43, Johannes P Fassotte <
johan...@automationassist.com> wrote:
> I also feel
> that there is way to much resistance by the LinuxCnc developers to
> implement what many of us may see as a absolute requirement.
1) This is the first time that I have heard this
Sory should have gone to list...
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] A vision for working now to LinuxCnc
version 10
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 12:53:31 -0800
From: chris morley
To: Johannes P Fassotte
On 2022-12-02 10:38, Johannes P Fassotte wrote:
Johannes,
Thank you for your thoughts and time to put this in writing.
I mostly agree with a few exceptions.
NML should be changed to DDS for easier compatibility with ROS2
https://www.ros.org/
LCNC development is all voluntary and the current devs are already
capacity with their time,
As you may know I have been desiring a better way to interface user
interfaces to LinuxCnc and strongly feel that there needs to be a big
change in the way this is being done at the present time. I also feel
that there is way to much resistance by the LinuxCnc developers to
implement what
Am 30.11.22 um 11:24 schrieb andy pugh:
pins.c, hostmot2.h, hostmot2.c, release_notes.txt, hostmot2.9, hm2_eth.9
changelog and VERSION should all be resolved by --ours.
For release_notes.txt please accept both changes but in reverse order,
so that it look like this
Le ven. 2 déc. 2022 à 03:01, Kurt Jacobson a
écrit :
>
> I have been busy starting a family so have been completely out of the
> LinuxCNC loop lately,glad to see most of the old familiar names still
>
active, as well as the new ones!
>
"Starting a family" ? Good one ! This never, ever ends LOL
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 at 04:38, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> I'm merging 2.8 into 2.9, and I came across a spot where it looks like a
> feature was added independently to both 2.8 and 2.9 (7i96s support in
> pncconf), and a bunch of bugfixes were applied in 2.9 but not 2.8.
I was going to do that
