On 1/26/2012 5:36 PM, Michael Haberler wrote:
. Lots of good stuff snipped.
re jog forwards/backwards:
I'd be interested to hear your ideas in more detail. It comes up regularly in
different shapes or forms, and it occurs to me that would need motion
support. How can the
Hi gentle people,
I've realized that there are some issues on soft limits, when using
not-trivial kinematics.
I'm using now the JA3 branch, but i remember i had the same results with
2.4.x ...if somebody wants to confirm is welcome.
i.e. into axis, those limits, which are drawn like red dotted
On 27 January 2012 17:18, Spiderdab 77...@tiscali.it wrote:
I personally think this kind of bug are of a main importance, and that
also should be simple to solve
I am not sure it is, in the general case..
Working out the boundary of the space that a non-trivial mechanism can
reach while
6dof robot sales brochures often have egg shaped 3d envelopes shown
the egg is supposedly the space the end effector can achive
ive never seen holes inside the eggs but suspect they exist )
anyway, i betcha there algs for this shape
regards
tomp
of course pretty heavy math
the keyword isrobot workspace
http://www.intechopen.com/source/pdfs/24606/InTech-Accurate_numerical_methods_for_computing_2d_and_3d_robot_workspace.pdf
http://husky.if.uidaho.edu/pubs/2011/HSI11_StanManSzepBal_PerfAnalDeltaRbt.pdf
java app to visualize 3d workspace
http://omega.uta.edu/~mvn6491/Robokine.html
tom3p
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just
On ven, 2012-01-27 at 17:27 +, andy pugh wrote:
On 27 January 2012 17:18, Spiderdab 77...@tiscali.it wrote:
I personally think this kind of bug are of a main importance, and that
also should be simple to solve
I am not sure it is, in the general case..
Working out the boundary of
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:17:18 +0100, Spiderdab wrote:
On ven, 2012-01-27 at 17:27 +, andy pugh wrote:
On 27 January 2012 17:18, Spiderdab 77...@tiscali.it wrote:
I personally think this kind of bug are of a main importance, and
that
also should be simple to solve
I am not sure it is,
On 1/27/2012 1:23 PM, andy pugh wrote:
On 27 January 2012 18:17, Spiderdab77...@tiscali.it wrote:
Well if it's so difficult to retro calculate the possible
volume-position from the kin module (and it seems like that..), we could
add a lot-simplified limits-volume. Let's say i want my machine
On sab, 2012-01-28 at 02:02 +0100, Spiderdab wrote:
On sab, 2012-01-28 at 00:38 +, andy pugh wrote:
On 28 January 2012 00:28, Spiderdab 77...@tiscali.it wrote:
Hi, for sure this is a rare case, but i need to loadrt two logic
components.
loadrt logic count=2 personality=2,7 (or
Kent A. Reed wrote:
I was just hopeful because of your last line No RTAI so far, but that
might come soon.
Well, Torsten Koschorrek tells me he is STILL working on the port. Must
have been WAY
harder than he originally thought. I would have expected that the
BeagleBoard has such
wide
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, andy pugh wrote:
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:23:25 +
From: andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com
Reply-To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
To: EMC developers
12 matches
Mail list logo
