Re: [Emc-developers] wiped out lcnc on my pi

2023-09-27 Thread Rod Webster
Gene, Great you are making progress. Your scripts won't work as you refer to 32 bit armhf and this is 64bit arm64 Also Buster uses Python 2.7 which was deprecated in Bullseye. Linuxcnc now uses Python 3.11 and 2.7 is not available. There should not be any missing dependencies to build linuxcnc as

Re: [Emc-developers] wiped out lcnc on my pi

2023-09-27 Thread Rod Webster
Sorry gremlins got in when you run the debian/configure script do it this way cd ~/linuxcnc-dev/debian ./configure uspace no-docs Rod Webster *1300 896 832* +61 435 765 611 Vehicle Modifications Network www.vehiclemods.net.au On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 06:23, Rod Webster wrote: > Gene, > Great

Re: [Emc-developers] wiped out lcnc on my pi

2023-09-27 Thread gene heskett
On 9/27/23 16:23, Rod Webster wrote: Gene, Great you are making progress. Your scripts won't work as you refer to 32 bit armhf and this is 64bit arm64 Also Buster uses Python 2.7 which was deprecated in Bullseye. Linuxcnc now uses Python 3.11 and 2.7 is not available. There should not be any

Re: [Emc-developers] RTAI broken again with LinuxCNC

2023-09-27 Thread andy pugh
On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 00:41, Alec Ari via Emc-developers wrote: > Would anyone be able to test LinuxCNC against the changes I'll be making to > RTAI? I can only test the sims, I don't have any actual CNC hardware > available. I can. Do I need to re-build RTAI? My current git pull is master

Re: [Emc-developers] RTAI broken again with LinuxCNC

2023-09-27 Thread Alec Ari via Emc-developers
Hi all, Rene said I should switch RTAI to GNU11: https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/3d926d87f14ada9dea313c2989ee8f24f0e54e0c#commitcomment-128557906 I suppose the above commit could be reverted. Would anyone be able to test LinuxCNC against the changes I'll be making to RTAI? I can

Re: [Emc-developers] RTAI broken again with LinuxCNC

2023-09-27 Thread Alec Ari via Emc-developers
Yes, use the gnu11 branch in my RTAI tree and pick either 4.19.294 or or 5.4.256 As an additional layer of testing, revert the C89 commit in LinuxCNC to make sure GNU11 `for` loops actually work as intended: https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commit/3d926d87f14ada9dea313c2989ee8f24f0e54e0c