be sent to me or the beremiz
developers mailing list.
Cheers,
Mario.
--
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https
I think it would be wiser to modify it for full 8 bits, which can be masked
down to less bits of output easily.
But there would need to be change in the generator too, so that it would go
by more than 1 step at a time when needed, and when going even faster the
generator would output only 4 states
, but since the EMC2 can give output of only about 50k changes per
second, that results in very slow maximum RPM.
(common stepper motors have 200 steps per revolution, that is 50 electrical
periods per revolution, 160*50 is 8000 per revolution.)
You get the idea...
Mario.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:27 AM
like anybody else
on the optics industry. Steps as small as 8 nanometers are used :)
Mario.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Slavko Kocjancic esla...@gmail.com wrote:
I hate step/dir as it make a lot of overhead if software stepgen is
used. (set new direction, wait proper time, make step signal
If you want to make it completely 3D compatible then defining angle in
planar and angle perpendicular direction would have to be defined.
This all could be taken relative to the working plane selected, if I am not
mistaken, right?
I propose making @P the perpendicular angle symbol.
something
PCI bus clock is not only variable, in many machines it may be as
well actively settable.
In the 486 days we used to set the PCI frequency by a divider. Today
PCIe prequencies are adjustible in BIOS, the PCI could be as well, or
via the PCI interface register. (chipset specific address?)
On Tue,
I guess it is a problem with cabling, wire routing, impedance mismatch
on inductive signal/power transfer lines and overall bad design which
is many times marked by a word, breakout.
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Jeff Eplerjep...@unpythonic.net wrote:
---
Based on about a billion irc
Great news having it so quickly.
Is there any plan for Ubuntu 9.04? I ask because many things regarding
to device/hardware support started working under 9.04 (finally), so
some users might benefit from that.
I don't need it immediately, but at the same time I have no clue what
are the practical
EBo, can you link or post that document to the WIKI?
That way you wouldn't need to post it everytime anyone asks how that works :)
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Chris Radek ch...@timeguy.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 08:12:48PM -0600, EBo wrote:
Do you have the paper (PDF) which
how do SSE2 SSE3 SSE4 and such instructions affect latency in terms of
context switching?
is there any noticeable difference?
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Jeff Epler jep...@unpythonic.net wrote:
I'll dig out out my hardy/amd64 system and commit this if that system
also keeps working.
maximum step rate: count with analog-output microstepped drives that I
make, that is 4000 steps per revolution for example, but from those on
sale, there are 25600 steps per revolution at low cost.
How about 2000 steps per revolution and 2 meters per second maximum
positioning rate? (2 milion
I'm not sure if anybody mentioned code misalignment. Maybe the
compiler provided wrong optimisation, or code that is only
incompatible with a certain CPU errata. Maybe I'm wrong, but
enabling/disabling some compiler optimisation feature might correct
that problem, it would be useful to look if the
with its own interrupt source it would be
much easier.
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 8:45 PM, John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Jon Elson wrote:
Mario. wrote:
I have the ultimate goal of reaching 2 milion quadrature output
changes per second from any of the outputs, even 200 thousand per
second
return and
wait for next Interrupt.
I am not shure, if something like this is implemented already, but i fear it
is not.
Maybe, someone gives me a hint on the operating System and the way, the
HW-Timers are used.
Thanks from
Andreas
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:33:57 +0100
From: Mario. emef
Many cheap mainboards with integrated CPUs do 100k interrupts per
second (100k steps per second in quadrature outputs) pretty well.
We need to see the difference betwee the step/dir output and clean,
fast quadrature output as step/dir output can reach at most 50% of the
output step speed of the
I have the ultimate goal of reaching 2 milion quadrature output
changes per second from any of the outputs, even 200 thousand per
second is almost good for me.
How does your method help me get to the intended goal? I'm talking
about parallel port of course.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:09 PM,
Paul, you are mostly right, but you forget about hardware-specific
properties of current CPU and chipset design, namely clock skipping
that is fully automated to save power, even as little as running an
empty loop might disable it effectively forcing CPU and chipset
abandon that particular power
Yes, that was my educated guess too. - that the empty loop causes
better distribution of tasks, namely that they remain in the same core
and computing is not distributed for one task between two cores.
But for the hardware part: cache prediction, jump prediction (and
cache miss) may also be
Did you already reconfugure it as a 2-core system and perharps also
disable the Hyperthreading?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Eric H. Johnson
ejohn...@camalytics.com wrote:
Hi all,
I now have a working system running with an SMP enabled kernel, including
the necessary drivers. I am getting
PM, Eric H. Johnson ejohn...@camalytics.com wrote:
Mario,
As Alex stated, there were a couple power management functions I had to
leave on in order to get the kernel to support multiple processors.
Regards,
Eric
The HT is better in off state, and next thing you MIGT to alter is the power
That's path difference of 0.0005 parts per major dimension, or 0.0005
of some another arbitrary units?
Becaus specifying dimensional parameters without any reference to
units used yields mixed results.
If possible, even if hard-coded, always use some kind of units, please :)
we have miles,
there are also realtime tap-points that can be displayed by an virtual
oscilloscope, but I never used it myself so can't tell you the name
and usage, it is also very important to see because it reveals the
real behaviour of control loops (signal overshoot and such)
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:25 PM,
:
Mario,
Ok, I added a hard drive, installed Debian Lenny and was able to follow the
instructions here:
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emcinfo.pl?Debian_Lenny_Compile_RTAI
I built three kernels, using processor family selections of
586/K5/5x86/6x86/6x86mx, even though the instructions said
make.conf perharps in /etc/?
I don'r temembere and I can't look
and prescott is P4, the same P4 where the hyperthreading was
invented, the same ISA is in the Atom.
And the other Atomium is in Belgium.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Eric H. Johnson
ejohn...@camalytics.com wrote:
Mario,
You
Does it work as as an export pluging for gcode, right?
Z-axis? so, it can use a real paintbrush or engrave illustrations with
varying tool depth depending on line width?
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Johnny Stenback e...@jstenback.com wrote:
Hello all,
I just wanted to share one of my
was the current kernel 2.6.24-16-rtai generated when the latest rtai
patch is 2.6.23... What is the -magma kernel Mario was referring to?
Basically my question is, what is the latest usable kernel and rtai patch,
and where do I get them? What is the specific kernel version used to create
the current Hardy
You're slowly seeing where the issues are. It's not that it's hard to
compile a kernel.. It's just a frustrating process to figure it out in the
beginning, then do it 4-5 times till it eventually is right. (not to mention
trying to build one that runs on all machines..).
Regards,
Alex
Atom is NOT Core2 architecture!!! Atom is 45nm Silverthorne,
minimalistic, low-powered, low-performance CPU that has the lowest
common denominator of any parts needed in a CPU.
1.6GHz Atom has about the power of a Celeron 220 or less. You need to
pick a different, proper architecture first,
for a specific architecture (tailor-made)
and Atom is very limited in all aspects, not sure if there is a
setting for that yet. but P6 setting was used on other architectures
taht had not their specific tag at that time.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Eric H. Johnson
ejohn...@camalytics.com wrote:
Mario
found it.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/110674/gcc-optimization-flags-for-intel-atom
And list of m_arch flags is here:
http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Safe_Cflags/Intel#Atom_N270
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Eric H. Johnson
ejohn...@camalytics.com wrote:
Alex,
They are pretty ok, but
Atom 330
32 bit profile (x86):
CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
MAKEOPTS=-j5
64 bit profile (amd64):
CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-march=nocona -O2 -pipe
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
MAKEOPTS=-j5
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Mario
So I understand it correctly that a wheel-cutter mode is now in
ideological development, right?
That's some great news!
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Chris Radek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:08:46PM -0600, Jon Elson wrote:
I think this is
if it is hard or easy to tap it into the
motion planner, plus the exact stop mode requires stopping with the
selected compensation (cut upper, middle, bottom layer, or
compensation off.)
That's my thought of that...
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Mario. wrote
I'm still reading and thinking about your control concept, also
because we made some reasoning previosly that this control concept
would be useful for a cutter table with a cutting wheel as a cheaper
replacement for laser shape-cutting. It never left the stage of being
a nice idea, but I see you
I'll sum the requirement:
Basically, all we want is to hook planner internal variable into axis output.
planner_heading_in_XY_plane axis_A | filter possible angle limits
The main obstacle here:
Is the heading angle at current point tappable at current EMC2 version?
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:33
while use=1 commit (suicide);
print read.user.input(n); n=n+1
like this? (tongue in cheek)
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Alex Joni alex.j...@robcon.ro wrote:
Well... you could have fixed it by yourself long ago too (tongue in cheek
;).
It's sometimes ok to commit something, and see what
Just a sidenote that Ubuntu 6.06LTS (the standard for EMC2 enabled
distribution in the past) was forcibly upgraded to current LTS
(long-term-support) version.
In other words, if it works in the linux distro usually provided on
linuxcnc site - it satisfies most novices anyway.
Someone who tries to
I guess it would be similar or same as lathe scripts that generate
specific feed for gradual material removal.
Perharps looking into applicable G-codes will show you the way, as
some of those movements can be made synchronous (like do 9.5 turns
with movement of 1mm per turn)
Codes for coil cutting
EMC has problem with arcing? Some high voltage transmissions have
problem with arcing too. :)
I don't use arc of any kind, by the way :)
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Dave Engvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Chris Radek wrote:
fix
He upset me when he began bragging that
he had fixed a number of bugs without noting that the code he had used
was experimental rather than released. His followers latched onto that
implying that EMC was not well thought out or executed. When we asked
where these bugs were located, he was
actually, as far as some architectures go, their 32-bit floating point
software is not slower than the early hardware floating point units.
At there MCU units the generic bulkiness of an operating system poses
the main problem. In assembly I can assure hard-realtime interrupts of
3 instruction
Professional and Free version. At that time Yodaiken claimed that RTAI
violated his patent, and the RTAI folks claimed they did not. At the time,
He would be FOOL not to claim that. It would be more like sending this message:
Dear military/aerospace agency/manufacturer. We heard there is a
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Chris Morley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been reading a little about RTAI and Xenomai.
I wonder Why EMC choose RTAI, Other then at the time Xenomai may not have
been available (around 2005?).
Xenomai is only, very, very recent 'invention'
It seems that
x86_64 has been the holy grail of all developers that was eagerly
accepted ever since AMD released the Hammer architecture (K8), but
still, for full application support we have to wait 5-10 more years.
Remember how long it took to release a 32-bit operating system since
the 32-bit computers were
You can only *properly* diagnose PWM signal with an oscilloscope or a
digital analyser. The PWM ramp-up or ramp-down may be really short (0.5s)
for the DMM to notice.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:47 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Eric H. Johnson wrote:
The run-away problem seems
Don't forget to check the PDF documentation first since that is the
one that comes with the EMC2 system and check what else is missing or
not according to the reality there.
On 7/9/08, Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Radek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:37:07PM -0400, Stephen
This is all great gyus, but I still have the feeling it would be nice
to mention this in the documentation. Remember the guides and manuals
fall into obsolescence with every one - no matter how good
improvement. :)
On 5/21/08, John Kasunich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dewey Garrett wrote:
I've
I started downloading now, but I already have a question.
On the Live CD, and then after installing, is there a realtine
performance test script ready?
In the old (2.1 EMD2 distro) I used a file with a script like this one:
/QUOTE BELOW
#!/bin/sh
sudo mkdir /dev/rtf; sudo mknod /dev/rtf/3 c
:
That will work - also jepler wrote a nice gui latency test program. You
can run it from terminal by issuing 'latency-test'.
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.2/html/config_stepconf.html#sec:Latency-Test
sam
Mario. wrote:
I started downloading now, but I already have a question
with the graphical inetrface test
script)
On 4/30/08, Alex Joni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mario,
here's how I usually run it:
1. emc's latency test:
open a terminal, type latency-test and it displays the values
2. RTAI's latency test:
open a terminal, type:
cd /usr/realtime-*/testsuite/kern
Is this the Ubuntu 8.04 version with AMD64 support?
On 4/28/08, Jeff Epler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the next bugfix release of the EMC 2.2 series,
version 2.2.5. This version fixes user-reported problems and adds a new
hardware driver.
The new packages are now
to the eternal
milling time of a complex shape? ;-)
On 4/28/08, John Kasunich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario. wrote:
Is this the Ubuntu 8.04 version with AMD64 support?
Not yet.
EMC 2.2.5 is a version of the program EMC. There are binary packages
available to run on Ubuntu 6.06 with real
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 28 April 2008, John Kasunich wrote:
Mario. wrote:
Is this the Ubuntu 8.04 version with AMD64 support?
Not yet.
EMC 2.2.5 is a version of the program EMC. There are binary packages
available to run on Ubuntu 6.06 with real-time extensions
have shown me the light, I will
have a look into it. Only a one miniature MCU and one capacitor are
really needed in this device. Perharps a resistor or two if I am
really pedant.
On 4/26/08, Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario. wrote:
Jon, I believe you have a very clear idea how to make
I immediately have to respond, because this is wonderful post and
topic to discuss.
low-cost connector like that, but with 4 power contacts
and at least 15 signal contacts. The power contacts should be
rated to 20 A
...isn't that an oxymoron?
You know, I honestly believe that such an connector
Concern: if it would damage latency or break functionality of
something else, then I don't know.
Comment: if it works well, go for it, EMC will get only stronger ;-)
On 4/3/08, Sebastian Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi JMKasunich and SWPadnos, would you mind if I added support for the
I will repeat what Steve said.
Thanks for all the work on this.
I will never use that particular interface probably, but I like that
there will be a wide and full support for many computer-to-machine
interfaces.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen
Okay, if you can do turnaround of at least 100 thousand output hardware
changes per second, I'm in. Quadrature outputs.
On 3/30/08, Neil Whelchel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I guess I should have been more specific when I was discussing the
topology about connecting to a WAN, or even a
Intel chipset and core2duo processor?
Any other problems like independent hardware power management?
Integrated graphics by intel?
How much is this overrun? Did you try to run the latency test script?
On 3/11/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,emc fans:
do you have such
1) What is the cost for me to use the code, change it, and make it
closed to my customer ? Or if this can be legally done ?
2) If I can continue to use, as I am now, controlling the servo drives
directly from the parallel port ?
3) If the tool tip radius compensation is implemented and
what you described inspired me... actually there should be - either external
or internal - possibility to display the logical diagram graphically. (yes a
large vector -based, or oldschool bitmap screen with all the gates and
ogical functions with descriptions like logical block names and
it with ever changing load and inertia
conditions, or how to get to that position just in the right time)
I thought that you already knew about these properties of stepper
motors, or feedback position motor control.
Mario.
On Dec 19, 2007 9:06 PM, Anton Buzinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi Paul
The Hurco system is here:
http://www.hurco.com/Hurco/English/Technology/Controls/WinMax+Conversational+Programming.htm
But there are many other than just HURCO, Fagor:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3101/is_6_77/ai_n6354218
Centroid:
http://www.centroidcnc.com/conversational.htm
Wow, you guys are amazing, could this mean I could connect EMC
directly to postscript output? I am developing scroll compressor in
postscript and it is almost done. Next I will export the curve into
X,Y coordinates for machining. But being able to do some autonomous
decisions of EMC in NGC
Bloat or not, those are the whole libraries you should be grateful
for. Completely pre-fabricated ;-) ... you wouldn't want to make them
manually from gates on your own.
On 11/13/07, John Kasunich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Epler wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:48:21PM -0700, Sebastian
architecture, which is orders more predictable
and more documented than this standard PC.
On 11/10/07, Mario. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The s/360 was not virtual in matter of frograms that much, but the
cake was a lie. I mean the CPU!!! What I mean by that there was no
native s/360 processor, only
be interested.
AW
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Mario. wrote:
not want do only do 'some' filtering, ideally we want exact
counterfilter for our aches. And we need someone with good math skills
to show us precisely how.
Or at least some basic DSP book :P I'm buying something for work (I have
I think the point was more like: running a 10kHz control loop with
10-cycle delay instead of running direct 1kHz control loop. I'm not
being specific here, just the picture.
On 11/5/07, Kenneth Lerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve,
The problem with a filter is that it introduces a delay. So
Now you speak my language!
In PAL and SECAM it was 64us exactly and it is a quartz delay line,
not glass, and it was in every color TV since there was no other way
how to do it in the early days. (the little box had a whole TV line in
sonic transit! :D) - so it was not only delay, it was a FIFO
If possible try to add your found and reported error (and solution)
into EMC FAQ database. I think it will help another people in the
future when trying to install EMC on their own :)
the link is here:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/component/option,com_xfaq/Itemid,5/lang,en/
Thank you.
On 11/2/07,
Well, that explains a lot. One option is to convert the D into
floating point (or fixed point with a decimal), but with an integrator
- FIR filter. You need a FIFO buffer where you put the D value, you
sum all the values in the FIFO, and if necessary divide it by the size
of the FIFO.
For
I don't see any. Maybe a virus? :D:D:D
Like this one?
http://www.homestarrunner.com/sbemail118.html
On 5/29/07, Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
lichao945 wrote:
I've already made some modification in ministetra.ini and there are
totally 5 joints in my new GUI.:)
What the hell is this
Heisenbug. Surely ;-)
Okay, I had similar problem in assembly, but that was probably
hardware... I included a single NOP instruction which solved a lot of
problems in a MCU by moving the rest of the program one instruction
away. But one thing the disabled debug messages surely do is that it
speeds
Okay, I was writing a rather lenghty reply for about 20 minutes, but
it got erased, so maybe later.
you say address sensitive? hmm, maybe it was compiled with the old
intel-8088 paging? :)
On 5/1/07, Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario. wrote:
Heisenbug. Surely ;-)
Okay, I had similar
] Behalf Of Till
Harbaum
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 4:17 AM
To: Mario.; EMC developers
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] DIY USB interface
Hi,
what do you mean by enumerate a few times? USB enumeration
takes place only once.
I don't think we need to discuss the basics of USB as i have built
Yes, you are right and it is nice that you point to the isochronous
transfers, but as a Microsoft standard, USB has had poor latency. It
is not known to me how are any recent latency tests...
On 4/23/07, Kenneth Lerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario,
It is my understanding that usb supports
The EMC2 manual says not to rely on ARC generator, probably also that
relates to CIRCLE. I just wonder whether defining circle as a
360-line 360-tangle would help the trajectory planner.
There are some principal issues with the trajectory planner. The
planner cannot setup itself :(
I spent hours
DMA turned of probably in BIOS. Large HDD fragmentation. Faulty disk
communication, etc, etc, etc. Busmastering turned off, ...
On 4/6/07, Alex Joni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a similar machine it usually takes up to 20 minutes.
Can you post the output from configure? (5 to 10 minutes is a
I am using
- Original Message -
From: Mario. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: EMC developers emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Help me to compile EMC2
Have you tried installing fresh linux CD (the one found on linuxcnc
Zero points :D
I don't have any clue why...
no problem.. I can view SVG in many other ways.
On 3/26/07, Matthew Glenn Shaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 23:05 +0200, Mario. wrote:
You are right, the xpi does not install for me either, it only wants
to save that file
CAD/CAM/CNC ...didyou hear those words?
CAD - computer aided design, that what makes the dxf files for example
CAM - this makes the manufacturing data for specific tools and NC machinery
CNC - computer(or complete) numeric control - manufacturing device
that is controlled by commands that contain
postscript for me please, I view by ghostview on Windows machine.
Allso useful for high-definition printing and zooming in and out of
the vector diagram.
Store it as a vector file.
On 3/11/07, Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Glenn Shaver wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 21:51 -0600,
Especially with 60% packet loss.
The extension.emc file is a proposed command file that would be
processed on program load and NC code would be translated from and
into according to definitions in that file. thinggs in [] are
parameters
On 1/1/07, Mario. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here
Now, you suggested me an idea!
The whole in/out thing in interfacing could be helped by shared
memory! The realtime system supports some definitions on this. We just
need to design all the names and their correct placement and agree on
that and it can be moved there! This is much how it is done
I understand, jut thought it sounds funny :D
The new miniature low consumption VIA boarts that run on +12V are
about at that speed.
On 12/31/06, Jon Elson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mario. wrote:
7 years advance equals to 2160MHz Pentium1, say 1500MHz Pentium3 would
suffice.
So, you
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] Change in feed override
duringmachineruncauses 1 milisecond stalls
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:17:20PM +0100, Mario. wrote:
So, if it is a warning, not an disaster-meaning message, why does
it
put the machine to a halt
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:17:20PM +0100, Mario. wrote:
So, if it is a warning, not an disaster-meaning message, why
does
it
put the machine to a halt without decelerating down?
It doesn't! Now I'm really puzzled. If the machine is stopping,
something else is going on and we need
keeps
the time :-)
That was true for the canon-presny.ini setup. With the setup file
canon-volny.ini I had to move the Jog Speed slider up to cause the error. It
occured at less that 50% of allowed joint movement speed.
Possible explanation: asynchronous updating of variables?
On 12/25/06, Mario
I am sending a link to my configuration files, since this mail-in system is
confusing.
Third attempt: INI files for the setup I use, plus some changed demo NC code
that tries to run very fast, as fast as the machine possibly can, good for
testing accel/ max speed setup.
It can be downloaded
It is not dependent on CPU frequency, at 1600MHz, dmesg reports that
at least the last 6 interrupts took ~160 cycles, and at 1920MHz
CPU frequency it reports 1759264 to 2099646 cycles between calls to
the motion controller. I did this mostly in AXIS, but it happened in
the other interface too.
90 matches
Mail list logo
