Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-07-03 Thread Piotr Galka
l or telephone and delete it and any attachments from your computer system and records. *From:*Douglas Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 27, 2017 2:27 PM *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards Colleagues, I just heard about a new Communication

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-30 Thread Mark Bailey
ated with a harmonised standard that determines the conformity assessment procedure? Best regards Mark B *From:* Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com] *Sent:* 28 June 2017 23:02 *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards If you have a transmitter-only de

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-29 Thread Piotr Galka
cene? Regards, Scott *From: *"Paasche, Dieter" <dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com> *Reply-To: *"Paasche, Dieter" <dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com> *Date: *Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 11:21 PM *To: *<EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> *Subject: *Re: [PSES] RED Harmoni

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-29 Thread Charlie Blackham
number 05466247 From: ce-test, qualified testing bv, Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl] Sent: 29 June 2017 06:04 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards Yes, as now system "system" is a multi-function apparatus it should comply with all appl

[PSES] AW: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-29 Thread Dürrer Bernd
ailto:dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com> Reply-To: "Paasche, Dieter" <mailto:dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com> Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 11:21 PM To: <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards Interesting. One addi

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv, Gert Gremmen
2017 23:06 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards If I insert a radio module into a system that is compliant to the RED and to the latest 301 489 series, do I have to re-test the whole system towards the 301 489 series? The system already complies with other r

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Michael Derby
(effectively, the receiver parts aren’t on the OJ). At least, that’s my understanding of it. Michael. From: Mark Bailey [mailto:mbai...@telensa.com] Sent: 28 June 2017 20:45 To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards ETSI EN 300 440-2 V1.4.1

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Michael Derby
une 28, 2017 2:59 PM To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org <mailto:EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org> Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards As far as I understand: Use EMCD HS for EM aspectsart 3.1 (No NB needed) ; that includes the 301 489 series for EMC of auxiliary equipment (intentiona

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Paasche, Dieter
C-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards As far as I understand: Use EMCD HS for EM aspectsart 3.1 (No NB needed) ; that includes the 301 489 series for EMC of auxiliary equipment (intentionally left out of RED should never have been on the RTTE list

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Douglas Nix
no standard > available, what will the NB have to impose ? > > Gert Gremmen > > > > Van: Michael Derby [mailto:micha...@acbcert.com > <mailto:micha...@acbcert.com>] > Verzonden: woensdag 28 juni 2017 20:04 > Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EM

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Mark Bailey
*From:* Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl] *Sent:* 28 June 2017 19:59 *To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG *Subject:* Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards As far as I understand: Use EMCD HS for EM aspectsart 3.1 (No NB needed) ; that includes the 301 489 series for EMC of auxiliary

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Gert Gremmen
den: woensdag 28 juni 2017 20:04 Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards I think they've been putting all their effort into getting the Article 3.2 standards onto the OJ as soon as they can (because those are the ones which the manufacturer needs, to self decl

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Michael Derby
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards Interesting. One additional question is I don't see any of the 301 489 series. Is this going to be published in the RED harmonized standards list, as it is strictly speaking and EMC requirement, or is this part of the article 3.1 b requirement

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Mike Sherman
nal Message - From: "Scott Aldous" <0220f70c299a-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> To: "EMC-PSTC" <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 11:45:40 AM Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards Hi Scott, Article 3, 1(a) of the RED refers

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Dan Roman
that 55032 is a normative reference, but... -- Dan Roman Senior Member dan.ro...@ieee.org danp...@verizon.net -Original Message- From: Scott Xe <scott...@gmail.com> To: EMC-PSTC <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Sent: Wed, Jun 28, 2017 12:14 pm Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonis

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Scott Aldous
> > Scott > > > > *From: *Scott Aldous <scottald...@google.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 11:45 PM > *To: *Scott Xe <scott...@gmail.com> > *Cc: *"EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" <EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org> > > *Subject: *Re: [PSES]

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Scott Xe
until they publish the HS for RED. Regards, Scott From: Scott Aldous <scottald...@google.com> Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 11:45 PM To: Scott Xe <scott...@gmail.com> Cc: "EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" <EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org> Subject: Re: [PS

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Scott Aldous
che, Dieter" <dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com> > *Reply-To: *"Paasche, Dieter" <dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 11:21 PM > *To: *<EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> > *Subject: *Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards >

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Scott Xe
; Reply-To: "Paasche, Dieter" <dieter.paas...@christiedigital.com> Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 11:21 PM To: <EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG> Subject: Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards Interesting. One additional question is I don’t see any of the 301 489 series.

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-28 Thread Paasche, Dieter
hments from your computer system and records. From: Douglas Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 2:27 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards Colleagues, I just heard about a new Communication and list of Harmonised Standards under the

Re: [PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-27 Thread Mike Sherman
It's an odd list, in that many explicitly do not provide presumption of conformity. Mike ShermanGraco Inc. Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App-- Original Message --From: Douglas NixTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGSent: June 27, 2017 at 2:29 PMSubject: [PSES] RED Harmonised

[PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-06-27 Thread Douglas Nix
Colleagues, I just heard about a new Communication and list of Harmonised Standards under the RED: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2017.180.01.0005.01.ENG=OJ:C:2017:180:TOC

[PSES] RED Harmonised Standards

2017-03-26 Thread ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
I did not read it on this list yet (unless a post missed by box again), but last week a new version of the list of Harmonised standards has been published (C76 10-3-2017) for the RED (2014/53/EC) 15 pages now of our beloved literature Regards, Ing. Gert Gremmen Approvals manager