From: owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Brent DeWitt
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:11 PM
To: T.Sato; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: FCC Part 18 - measurement at closer distance
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
I read in !emc-pstc that Brent DeWitt bdew...@ix.netcom.com wrote (in
jfekiiblahflflapjdmdoelaepaa.bdew...@ix.netcom.com) about 'FCC Part 18
- measurement at closer distance' on Thu, 8 Jul 2004:
At close
distances the FCC
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
Brent,
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 19:10:49 -0600,
Brent DeWitt bdew...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
I have had experience submitting data taken at a closer distance than
specified, although in this case it was 120kHz RF-ID systems. At
-p...@listserv.ieee.org]On Behalf Of T.Sato
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 6:44 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: FCC Part 18 - measurement at closer distance
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
--
On Thu
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 08:14:44 -0600,
drcuthb...@micron.com wrote:
I ran the sim again using perfect GND. The field falls off as 1/d. Over
lossy ground it falls off much faster than 1/d. The antennas are 1/4
wavelength
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
Thank you.
From: drcuthb...@micron.com
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 08:14:44 -0600
To: ken.ja...@emccompliance.com, vef00...@nifty.ne.jp,
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: FCC Part 18 - measurement at closer distance
Ken,
I ran
the aggregate productivity of the entire
world (speaking as an economist would).
Dave Cuthbert
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 8:05 AM
To: drcuthbert; vef00...@nifty.ne.jp; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: FCC Part 18 - measurement at closer distance
be interesting to know what assumptions were made to derive the field
intensity profile. I hasten to add I know nothing about NEC or how you use
it.
From: drcuthb...@micron.com
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:52:27 -0600
To: vef00...@nifty.ne.jp, emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: FCC Part 18 - measurement
Micron Technology
From: owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of T.Sato
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 9:09 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: FCC Part 18 - measurement at closer distance
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http
, 08 Jul 2004 12:08:36 +0900 (JST)
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: FCC Part 18 - measurement at closer distance
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
--
Dear EMC experts,
FCC Part 18 (46 CFR 18.305) defines field strength
http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
http://www.emc2004.org/
Dear EMC experts,
FCC Part 18 (46 CFR 18.305) defines field strength limit at very
long distance such as 300m and 1600m.
Fortunately, it is permitted to make a measurement at closer
distance:
Sec. 18.305 Field strength
11 matches
Mail list logo
