RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something

2002-04-30 Thread Gregg Kervill
-Subject: RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something - - - -With regards to the need to subject something running from a 9V -battery to a battery (pun not intended) of safety approvals, to me -this shows how some aspects of regulatory control are just a solution -searching desperately

RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something

2002-04-30 Thread Gregg Kervill
: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:11 PM -To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org -Subject: Re: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something - - - -I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson robert_wil...@tirsys.com wrote -(in 3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F698B@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM) -about 'General Product

Re: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something

2002-04-29 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Robert Wilson robert_wil...@tirsys.com wrote (in 3FF57405336C9B4C976A1819F860A2560F698B@xng_tirsys.TIRSYS.COM) about 'General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something', on Mon, 29 Apr 2002: With regards to the need to subject something running from a 9V battery

RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something

2002-04-29 Thread Robert Wilson
To: richwo...@tycoint.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something -Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated -ITE product(sic) Consider the liability and your defense - it you review to the ITE standard then you have

RE: General Product Safety Directive - sorry missed something

2002-04-29 Thread Gregg Kervill
-Let's take an example of a non-rechargable 9V battery operated -ITE product(sic) Consider the liability and your defense - it you review to the ITE standard then you have performed due diligence - if you do not review to the ITE standard then you have not! If you assume that the product