'Scuse me for stepping in but I'm a bit confused by a couple of things
being said in this thread.
1. Exactly why does a low accel round corners more than a fast accel.?
Does this suggest that a machine with slightly underpowered drive motors
is inherently less precise than one with big
At 02:10 PM 5/19/2008, you wrote:
Is tapping obsolete?
http://www.emuge.com/carbide_thread/
Nope, tapping is still useful, these tools need space (try making a 2 mm
thread this way - the tool is larger).
But this is really useful, there are different tools. Threading mills
like the one
Trying to wrap my mind around this tool. One of the bullet points says that
only one tool needed for right or left hand threads. Howdeydodat?
Mark
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
The rotation direction of the threading pattern. Same tool goes either left
or right
2008/5/20 Mark Wendt (Contractor) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 06:37 AM 5/20/2008, you wrote:
Trying to wrap my mind around this tool. One of the bullet points says
that only one tool needed for right or left hand threads. Howdeydodat?
Mark
The rotation direction of the threading pattern.
At 07:04 AM 5/20/2008, you wrote:
2008/5/20 Mark Wendt
(Contractor)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
At 06:37 AM 5/20/2008, you
wrote:
Trying to wrap my mind around this tool. One of the bullet
points says that only one tool needed for right or left hand
threads. Howdeydodat?
Mark
The rotation
You can use stepconf again if you didn't change anything in the files except
the files
that says it is ok to change...
On 19 May 2008 at 18:05, aaron Moore wrote:
The stepconfig wizard only seems to work when setting up a completely
new configuration, There after I cannot test the axis when
Here is where I would get mine if I wanted to do it
http://www.lakeshorecarbide.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATSCategory=50
They even have some sample programs...
On 19 May 2008 at 9:36, Kirk Wallace wrote:
Is tapping obsolete?
http://www.emuge.com/carbide_thread/
--
Kirk Wallace
At 06:16 PM 5/19/2008, you wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 05:41:25PM -0400, xtra209 wrote:
Is there any work happening on G68?
Can you find a link to a manual or similar source that describes
definitively how G68 works? I found some examples, and people
asking questions about it, but none of
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:37:40 +0200
From: Svenne Larsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Thread Milling
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Ian W. Wright wrote:
'Scuse me for stepping in but I'm a bit confused by a couple of things
being said in this thread.
1. Exactly why does a low accel round corners more than a fast accel.?
Does this suggest that a machine with slightly underpowered drive motors
is inherently less
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 08:14:00AM +0100, Ian W. Wright wrote:
why does a low accel round corners more than a fast accel.?
By default, the emc trajectory planner tries to keep the greatest speed
possible while touching each commanded line (or arc) in at least one
spot. It does this by
The direction of rotation of the thread mill does not reverse, only
the helix that it travels reverses. Think of it as switching from
conventional milling cuts to climb milling cuts.
Steve Stallings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark
Hi Steve,
My feeble
mind has finally gotten around how the things work. Makes sense
now. I was thinking of it from a tap-centric
view... ;-)
Mark
At 08:37 AM 5/20/2008, you wrote:
The
direction of rotation of the thread mill does not reverse, only
the helix that it travels reverses. Think of it
There was quite a bit of work done at NIST with locating of and
discovery of the pose of a casting using probing. Much of it became a
part of the CMM system they wrote. The advantage of it was that they
could throw a part up there anywhere on the table and the CMM would find
the part, find the
Jeff,
I followed the instructions you asked me to. Things are stranger than I
realized the first time around. Sometimes I have to click forward with
the mouse and sometimes I have to use the enter button to proceed. I
actually got through the wizard once... I'm not sure if anything works
If by coordinate system offsets you mean X,Y,Z,A,B,C applied to G54-G59.3
and also to a G52 local, then a G68 should not be needed.
The rotation offsets on the G54-G59.3 would handle part/program rotations
and the G52 would handle rotations of pocketing subs and such stuff within
the Gcode
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:52:14AM -0400, xtra209 wrote:
Jeff,
I followed the instructions you asked me to. Things are stranger than I
realized the first time around. Sometimes I have to click forward with
the mouse and sometimes I have to use the enter button to proceed. I
actually got
Ian W. Wright wrote:
'Scuse me for stepping in but I'm a bit confused by a couple of things
being said in this thread.
1. Exactly why does a low accel round corners more than a fast accel.?
The program calculates all moves based on the specified machine
acceleration in the ini file, and
At 12:11 PM 5/20/2008, you wrote:
Mark Wendt (Contractor) wrote:
Trying to wrap my mind around this tool. One of the bullet points says
that only one tool needed for right or left hand threads. Howdeydodat?
It is not like a tap, it has no thread lead. All the teeth are
in rings. The
Hi,
I took a look at the Ge Fanuc user manual and lo and behold: G50 G51
scaling.
The reason I was curious about it, was two separate machining issues.
One, scaling. I have a breakout board PCB isolation milling file that
I thought would look cool made real large. Suitable for wall
To add to the history lesson...
On Saturday 17 May 2008, Ray Henry wrote:
The BDI evolved out of an early discussion that we came to call a
Brain Dead Install when the EMC was still a part of NIST. It's
difficult to imagine now how much trouble it was to get a running
version of the EMC
It would making viewing the EMC-users Message digest easier on small
laptop screens
(fewer clicks = less carpal tunnel) if the boilerplate lines starting
with:
Send Emc-users mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
were moved to the bottom of Today's Topics, or below all the
paul_c wrote:
To add to the history lesson...
(snip)
I no longer have access to the repository
(not even anonymous)
EVERYONE has anonymous read access:
http://cvs.linuxcnc.org/cvs/
Regards,
John Kasunich
-
This
Christopher Purcell wrote:
It would making viewing the EMC-users Message digest easier on small
laptop screens
(fewer clicks = less carpal tunnel) if the boilerplate lines starting
with:
Send Emc-users mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
were moved to the bottom of
On Tue, 13 May 2008 at 20:59:05 -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 09:11:05PM -0400, Kent A. Reed wrote:
I hope someone holding write-permission to the wiki.linuxcnc.org
To get write permission, follow the BasicSteps and log in
25 matches
Mail list logo
